Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Yes the govt. does make them provide information, one such item is gas mileage on the sales display window sticker...You wouldn't buy a car without knowing the details of the vehicle and that information is printed in magazines, newspapers and flyers for consumers...Who?
I haven't really noticed that. In fact, I've seen mostly the opposite.Yes. That's what these laws are about - "affecting" other people's choices.
Yes. Giving them information so they can make INFORMED choices. Why is that such a problem?
And I wouldn't think that would require the government to pass laws mandating that that information be posted all over the walls of the dealership. Notice that all of the information you listed is provided voluntarily, and people are expected to be able to access it without any government help.
I didn't know that was a government requirement. I thought dealerships did so for sales purposes.
But you know......we can take this a step further. I think we need a law that every item sold in this country has to have an environmental cost on the price tag. If you buy a car for 20K, it should inform the purchaser that 8K of that money went to make that vehicle greener. If you buy a lawnmower for 400 bucks, it should include information that 100 bucks of that went to environmental causes. Same with furnaces, canned goods in stores, home furnishings, just let everybody know. Gasoline for $2.50 a gallon? $1.00 per gallon went to green initiatives.
The problem we have with environment in this country is that it's intrinsic in the price of what we pay per item. Maybe we should take a tip from the Democrats and use the same tactics to attack their causes.
Boy would you hear the screaming and howling then.
Dealerships DO do so for sales purposes. Nevertheless, because of retards like Moonpie, who can't bear to do ANYTHING without being able to comfort themselves that Daddy Government is watching, the government legally mandates that they do what they were going to do anyway.
Because we have nothing better to do with our tax money than to create redundant laws.