The constitution condemns Obama as a traitor, is there anyone that argue HE is not?

Moorelloyd

Gold Member
Aug 5, 2016
575
212
Obozo gave the stand down order and murdered four Americans! You are for this piece of crap and even after he did that to our own people?!!! Put yourself in their shoes - the firefight lasted for better part of 13 F ing hours and even after they called out on a satellite phone, NOT ONE SINGLE US MILITARY ASSET WAS MOBILIZED IN A FAKE ATTEMPT FOR RESCUE. I've been saying this for years and just last week Trey Goudy of the Select Committee on the Benghazi investigation stated exactly the same thing!!
 
Obozo gave the stand down order and murdered four Americans! You are for this piece of crap and even after he did that to our own people?!!! Put yourself in their shoes - the firefight lasted for better part of 13 F ing hours and even after they called out on a satellite phone, NOT ONE SINGLE US MILITARY ASSET WAS MOBILIZED IN A FAKE ATTEMPT FOR RESCUE. I've been saying this for years and just last week Trey Goudy of the Select Committee on the Benghazi investigation stated exactly the same thing!!
Can we just give this lunatic his own forum? Or at least merge this thread where he lies about this same exact bullshit into one thread?

Why don't you answer these questions? because it requires a functioning brain, which you don't have
 
Obozo gave the stand down order and murdered four Americans!

How is that unconstitutional?

If anything, Obama is a byproduct of the shit constitution.

you are really stretching what you say about Obozo. He is a clown, a traitor, sat on his hands for 13 hours and gave to stand down order. This has been verified by independent private military contractors. So Congress is too gutless to do anything and you think it is right?!!! You have guts to say that in front of your troops if you were in combat?!!! Don't think so Negro. Obozo and Killery are definitely both traitors.
 
Obozo gave the stand down order and murdered four Americans! You are for this piece of crap and even after he did that to our own people?!!! Put yourself in their shoes - the firefight lasted for better part of 13 F ing hours and even after they called out on a satellite phone, NOT ONE SINGLE US MILITARY ASSET WAS MOBILIZED IN A FAKE ATTEMPT FOR RESCUE. I've been saying this for years and just last week Trey Goudy of the Select Committee on the Benghazi investigation stated exactly the same thing!!
Can we just give this lunatic his own forum? Or at least merge this thread where he lies about this same exact bullshit into one thread?

Why don't you answer these questions? because it requires a functioning brain, which you don't have
There was no stand down order and military forces were, in fact, mobilized. There. Will you go fuck yourself now?
 
The OP still has not explained how giving a stand down order is unconstitutional.

As commander in chief, it is fully within his legal powers to make that call.

Despite the OP being 100% false, the drones are going to jump on for a chance to whip at Obama.
 
Based on what? Seriously, anything we could of done would of ended up killing those people anyways.

This isn't unconstitutional....I can assure you that Reagans Beirut, which didn't do shit after 300 marines is far far worse.
 
Now let's get the facts straight if we are going to bitch at each other, YES there was an order not to engage the attackers, THAT IS A WELL KNOWN FACT. There was a pilot downed in the same area two weeks earlier, and he was out in a couple of hours because they mobilized enough people to get him in a very short time, and as far as I can find they did not reduce the deployments in those two weeks. THAT IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD. Could they have stopped the attack and saved the people who died possibly but we will never know we could project a fantasy like liberals do to say it was a definitive YES, but we would be ass "outa themselves" uming as they do. As far as that being cause for a charge of TREASON, It is abhorrent, but Treason has a really high standard. Like giving aid and comfort to the enemy. It would take something like facilitating selling an enemy state nuclear material from our reserves.
 
Now let's get the facts straight if we are going to bitch at each other, YES there was an order not to engage the attackers, THAT IS A WELL KNOWN FACT. There was a pilot downed in the same area two weeks earlier, and he was out in a couple of hours because they mobilized enough people to get him in a very short time, and as far as I can find they did not reduce the deployments in those two weeks. THAT IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD. Could they have stopped the attack and saved the people who died possibly but we will never know we could project a fantasy like liberals do to say it was a definitive YES, but we would be ass "outa themselves" uming as they do. As far as that being cause for a charge of TREASON, It is abhorrent, but Treason has a really high standard. Like giving aid and comfort to the enemy. It would take something like facilitating selling an enemy state nuclear material from our reserves.
Or giving several billion dollars in unmarked bills to terrorists?
 

Forum List

Back
Top