Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 6,536
- 2,241
- 210
The Colorado supreme based it judgment on that he engaged in insurrection. it is not a conviction of insurrection. This is what the 14th amendment says engage which is not the same as a conviction. It does not mention anything about a conviction.LOL
You fucking moron, here's the screenshot I posted of YOU calling YOU a "moron asshole"...
![]()
That is correct
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.This is disqualification from the office
That is all they can do based on what was presented to them.
Criminal conduct may be addressed at lower courts under different criminal laws that may apply if they were interested in putting Trump in jail but it is not the focus of the Section or of the ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court.
I