The definitive guide to the 2nd Amendment

[jillian]

The People are the Militia; only well regulated militia may not be Infringed, when due to the security needs of our free States.

That simply isn’t true. As usual, you are lying. Here is indisputable proof - from none other than people who wrote, signed, and contributed to the U.S. constitution and subsequent amendments.

"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright (June 5, 1824)

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788

Note that Samuel Adams did not say “the militia”. He clearly stated the people and followed that up with citizens (again - not militia).

Thanks for playing, Daniel. As always, you are dead wrong and you know it. These are the words of the people behind our laws and they are very clear.

Our Second Amendment is our supreme law of the land, not any diversion or wishful thinking.

it takes precedence over the rest of our laws?

stupidest thing I've heard this evening.

 

[danielpalos]

The People are the Militia; only well regulated militia may not be Infringed, when due to the security needs of our free States.

That simply isn’t true. As usual, you are lying. Here is indisputable proof - from none other than people who wrote, signed, and contributed to the U.S. constitution and subsequent amendments.

"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright (June 5, 1824)

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788

Note that Samuel Adams did not say “the militia”. He clearly stated the people and followed that up with citizens (again - not militia).

Thanks for playing, Daniel. As always, you are dead wrong and you know it. These are the words of the people behind our laws and they are very clear.

Our Second Amendment is our supreme law of the land, not any diversion or wishful thinking.

it takes precedence over the rest of our laws?

stupidest thing I've heard this evening.

silly chic. he wasn't quoting any laws.

 

[jillian]

The People are the Militia; only well regulated militia may not be Infringed, when due to the security needs of our free States.

That simply isn’t true. As usual, you are lying. Here is indisputable proof - from none other than people who wrote, signed, and contributed to the U.S. constitution and subsequent amendments.

"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright (June 5, 1824)

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788

Note that Samuel Adams did not say “the militia”. He clearly stated the people and followed that up with citizens (again - not militia).

Thanks for playing, Daniel. As always, you are dead wrong and you know it. These are the words of the people behind our laws and they are very clear.

Our Second Amendment is our supreme law of the land, not any diversion or wishful thinking.

it takes precedence over the rest of our laws?

stupidest thing I've heard this evening.

silly chic. he wasn't quoting any laws.

poor little moron, YOU said the 2nd is our supreme law of the land.

and I asked a question.

now do try to read with comprehension. dumbass trump troll.

 

[P@triot]

Our Second Amendment is our supreme law of the land, not any diversion or wishful thinking.

Well, actually, the U.S. Constitution itself is the “supreme law of the land”. The 2nd Amendment is only a part of that. But it does appear that you’re making strides in figuring out the U.S. system of government.

 

[P@triot]

Our Second Amendment is our supreme law of the land, not any diversion or wishful thinking.

it takes precedence over the rest of our laws? stupidest thing I've heard this evening.

silly chic. he wasn't quoting any laws.

poor little moron, YOU said the 2nd is our supreme law of the land. and I asked a question. now do try to read with comprehension. dumbass trump troll.

 

[danielpalos]

The People are the Militia; only well regulated militia may not be Infringed, when due to the security needs of our free States.

That simply isn’t true. As usual, you are lying. Here is indisputable proof - from none other than people who wrote, signed, and contributed to the U.S. constitution and subsequent amendments.

"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright (June 5, 1824)

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788

Note that Samuel Adams did not say “the militia”. He clearly stated the people and followed that up with citizens (again - not militia).

Thanks for playing, Daniel. As always, you are dead wrong and you know it. These are the words of the people behind our laws and they are very clear.

Our Second Amendment is our supreme law of the land, not any diversion or wishful thinking.

it takes precedence over the rest of our laws?

stupidest thing I've heard this evening.

silly chic. he wasn't quoting any laws.

poor little moron, YOU said the 2nd is our supreme law of the land.

and I asked a question.

now do try to read with comprehension. dumbass trump troll.

it is part of our supreme law of the land.

 

[danielpalos]

Our Second Amendment is our supreme law of the land, not any diversion or wishful thinking.

Well, actually, the U.S. Constitution itself is the “supreme law of the land”. The 2nd Amendment is only a part of that. But it does appear that you’re making strides in figuring out the U.S. system of government.

You were not quoting our supreme law of the land, for comparison and contrast.

 

[jillian]

That simply isn’t true. As usual, you are lying. Here is indisputable proof - from none other than people who wrote, signed, and contributed to the U.S. constitution and subsequent amendments.
Note that Samuel Adams did not say “the militia”. He clearly stated the people and followed that up with citizens (again - not militia).

Thanks for playing, Daniel. As always, you are dead wrong and you know it. These are the words of the people behind our laws and they are very clear.

Our Second Amendment is our supreme law of the land, not any diversion or wishful thinking.

it takes precedence over the rest of our laws?

stupidest thing I've heard this evening.

silly chic. he wasn't quoting any laws.

poor little moron, YOU said the 2nd is our supreme law of the land.

and I asked a question.

now do try to read with comprehension. dumbass trump troll.

it is part of our supreme law of the land.

and there are time place and manner restrictions on speech, little one.

and exigent circumstances and other limitations on the fourth.

and you can be forced to do a breathalyzer or the refusal can be used against you in a limitation on the fifth amendment.

damn gun nuts are morons. stop believing the NRA you shill for.

 

[danielpalos]

Our Second Amendment is our supreme law of the land, not any diversion or wishful thinking.

it takes precedence over the rest of our laws?

stupidest thing I've heard this evening.

silly chic. he wasn't quoting any laws.

poor little moron, YOU said the 2nd is our supreme law of the land.

and I asked a question.

now do try to read with comprehension. dumbass trump troll.

it is part of our supreme law of the land.

and there are time place and manner restrictions on speech, little one.

and exigent circumstances and other limitations on the fourth.

and you can be forced to do a breathalyzer or the refusal can be used against you in a limitation on the fifth amendment.

damn gun nuts are morons. stop believing the NRA you shill for.

Our Second Amendment is about what is necessary to the security of a free State.

Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

Better aqueducts, better roads, and more well regulated militia!

 

[danielpalos]

women should try to intimidate guys and "kill two birds with one stone" by claiming, "grab my pussy, i grab your gun".

 

[P@triot]

and there are time place and manner restrictions on speech, little one.

Well actually, no, there isn’t. But like all facists, you love the idea of limiting or controlling speech.

 

[P@triot]

Our Second Amendment is about what is necessary to the security of a free State.

No it’s not. I’ve already proven you wrong by actual quotes from the founders. Why do you insist on continuing with your false narrative when everyone can already see you are wrong?

 

[danielpalos]

Our Second Amendment is about what is necessary to the security of a free State.

No it’s not. I’ve already proven you wrong by actual quotes from the founders. Why do you insist on continuing with your false narrative when everyone can already see you are wrong?

What false narrative? Seems more like right wing, reading comprehension issues.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

 

[P@triot]

Nowhere is the unorganized militia declared necessary, in our Second Amendment.

The predatory clause is largely irrelevant. It is the why. But the what is that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Don’t like it? Get bent.

The first clause provides the context for the second clause.

The first clause uses the term well regulated militia which is plural and collective and fixes that context for the second clause which contains the term, the People, which is also collective and plural, not Only on its own, but also due to the Context of the first clause.

It doesn’t provide “context” (desperate as you may be for that to be the case). It provides the why. The founders were merely explaining their reasoning behind giving people the right to keep and bear arms.

You don’t even understand the Bill of Rights. You have no idea why it exists or what it really means. You need to understand the broader level basics before you can attempt to drill down and discuss nuance.

Yes, it does. Why do you believe it is even in our Second Amendment?

For the fifth time now....it is the why. They were explaining why they were adding the 2nd Amendment. It is not the what.

 

[P@triot]

Our Second Amendment is about what is necessary to the security of a free State.

No it’s not. I’ve already proven you wrong by actual quotes from the founders. Why do you insist on continuing with your false narrative when everyone can already see you are wrong?

What false narrative?

Your false narrative that constitutional rights do not belong to the people - but rather to “protected classes” (such as “militias”).

 

[Kosh]

This thread proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the far left wants to do away with the 2nd amendment.

 

[danielpalos]

Nowhere is the unorganized militia declared necessary, in our Second Amendment.

The predatory clause is largely irrelevant. It is the why. But the what is that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Don’t like it? Get bent.

The first clause provides the context for the second clause.

The first clause uses the term well regulated militia which is plural and collective and fixes that context for the second clause which contains the term, the People, which is also collective and plural, not Only on its own, but also due to the Context of the first clause.

It doesn’t provide “context” (desperate as you may be for that to be the case). It provides the why. The founders were merely explaining their reasoning behind giving people the right to keep and bear arms.

You don’t even understand the Bill of Rights. You have no idea why it exists or what it really means. You need to understand the broader level basics before you can attempt to drill down and discuss nuance.

Yes, it does. Why do you believe it is even in our Second Amendment?

For the fifth time now....it is the why. They were explaining why they were adding the 2nd Amendment. It is not the what.

The security needs of a free State, seems more important than any natural rights.

 

[danielpalos]

Our Second Amendment is about what is necessary to the security of a free State.

No it’s not. I’ve already proven you wrong by actual quotes from the founders. Why do you insist on continuing with your false narrative when everyone can already see you are wrong?

What false narrative?

Your false narrative that constitutional rights do not belong to the people - but rather to “protected classes” (such as “militias”).

You simply appeal to ignorance and merely spam this board, with that response. The People are the Militia. You are either, well regulated and Necessary, or unorganized and unnecessary.

 

[danielpalos]

This thread proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the far left wants to do away with the 2nd amendment.

This thread proves the right wing is simply, clueless and Causeless.

 

[P@triot]

The security needs of a free State, seems more important than any natural rights.

Said Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot, Fidel Castro, and Joseph Stalin...