The Democrat "Pot Vote"

[ScienceRocks]

Conservatives,

If I smoke pot...Do you want to lock me up for it?

 

[Vox]

Oh, yes. It's SOOO dangerous.

How many people were listed as dying from marijuana-induced complications in 2013? In 2012? In 2011? 2010? 2009? Any year since 10,000BCE?

Zero.

Zero deaths reported by any doctor, anywhere, caused by smoking marijuana. So with all of your studies about the "increased risks" of whatever, there still have not been any documented cases of anyone dying from smoking Cannabis.

And Cannabis may cure cancer.

horseshit. cannabis has been linked to PRODUCE cancer

read the links, idiot and you will have the answers to your stupidity.

but you won't as it will poke your THC bubble

 

[KNB]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ngc0_mQ5tjE]Hemp For Victory (1942) U.S. Department of Agriculture - YouTube[/ame]

Support our troops! Grow hemp for the War on Drugs!

 

[KNB]

Oh, yes. It's SOOO dangerous.

How many people were listed as dying from marijuana-induced complications in 2013? In 2012? In 2011? 2010? 2009? Any year since 10,000BCE?

Zero.

Zero deaths reported by any doctor, anywhere, caused by smoking marijuana. So with all of your studies about the "increased risks" of whatever, there still have not been any documented cases of anyone dying from smoking Cannabis.

And Cannabis may cure cancer.

horseshit. cannabis has been linked to PRODUCE cancer

read the links, idiot and you will have the answers to your stupidity.

but you won't as it will poke your THC bubble

Yes, marijuana causes cancer. That's why America's doctors prescribe it to cancer patients. Conservatives are smart.

 

[Vox]

and idiot KNB does not even know that HEMP is not the same as pot for smoking

why am I NOT surprised

 

[ScienceRocks]

Do I have a right to smoke mary jane?

 

[Vox]

Oh, yes. It's SOOO dangerous.

How many people were listed as dying from marijuana-induced complications in 2013? In 2012? In 2011? 2010? 2009? Any year since 10,000BCE?

Zero.

Zero deaths reported by any doctor, anywhere, caused by smoking marijuana. So with all of your studies about the "increased risks" of whatever, there still have not been any documented cases of anyone dying from smoking Cannabis.

And Cannabis may cure cancer.

horseshit. cannabis has been linked to PRODUCE cancer

read the links, idiot and you will have the answers to your stupidity.

but you won't as it will poke your THC bubble

Yes, marijuana causes cancer. That's why America's doctors prescribe it to cancer patients. Conservatives are smart.

yes, it does. as other smoking.

but you won't get adenocarcinoma of the lungs as you will die before that - your heavy pot usage will bring you the other ailments much more pleasant than lung cancer.

 

[KNB]

From one of your links:

While the majority of users can continue their use without adverse effects, it is clear from studies of psychosis that some individuals are more vulnerable to its effects than others.

Did you read your own links?

 

[KNB]

Yes, marijuana causes cancer. That's why America's doctors prescribe it to cancer patients. Conservatives are smart.

yes, it does. as other smoking.

but you won't get adenocarcinoma of the lungs as you will die before that - your heavy pot usage will bring you the other ailments much more pleasant than lung cancer.

How many marijuana smokers died from lung cancer last year? It's the same as the number of overdoses.

ZERO.

Big, fat fucking ZERO. Look it up.

 

[Vox]

Yes, marijuana causes cancer. That's why America's doctors prescribe it to cancer patients. Conservatives are smart.

yes, it does. as other smoking.

but you won't get adenocarcinoma of the lungs as you will die before that - your heavy pot usage will bring you the other ailments much more pleasant than lung cancer.

How many marijuana smokers died from lung cancer last year? It's the same as the number of overdoses.

ZERO.

Big, fat fucking ZERO. Look it up.

you can enjoy the testicular cancer causes by your pot usage as well:

Compared with never use, ever use of marijuana had a 2-fold increased risk (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.02-3.68

Population-based case-control study of recreational drug use and testis cancer risk confirms an association between marijuana use and nonseminoma risk - Lacson - 2012 - Cancer - Wiley Online Library

enjoy that joint

 

[KNB]

and idiot KNB does not even know that HEMP is not the same as pot for smoking

why am I NOT surprised

DERP! Good one, Vox!

No, marijuana and hemp do not have the same traits. But the US Federal government doesn't care. That's why industrial hemp is illegal as a drug, and 99% of the "marijuana" destroyed by the DEA each year is wild hemp.

And the licenses that allowed Americans to grow hemp to protect your freedom during World War II read, "Producer of Marihuana".

Hemp and Marijuana are Cannabis Sativa Linn.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Do I have a right to smoke mary jane? Or do you want to use the government to stop me.

 

[KNB]

yes, it does. as other smoking.

but you won't get adenocarcinoma of the lungs as you will die before that - your heavy pot usage will bring you the other ailments much more pleasant than lung cancer.

How many marijuana smokers died from lung cancer last year? It's the same as the number of overdoses.

ZERO.

Big, fat fucking ZERO. Look it up.

you can enjoy the testicular cancer causes by your pot usage as well:

Compared with never use, ever use of marijuana had a 2-fold increased risk (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.02-3.68

Population-based case-control study of recreational drug use and testis cancer risk confirms an association between marijuana use and nonseminoma risk - Lacson - 2012 - Cancer - Wiley Online Library

enjoy that joint

Wow. A "2-fold" RISK. Risk is NOT a diagnosis. How many of those people died from testicular cancer caused specifically by smoking marijuana?

And if smoking marijuana causes cancer, then why do doctors prescribe it to cancer patients?

 

[Vox]

Yes, marijuana causes cancer. That's why America's doctors prescribe it to cancer patients. Conservatives are smart.

yes, it does. as other smoking.

but you won't get adenocarcinoma of the lungs as you will die before that - your heavy pot usage will bring you the other ailments much more pleasant than lung cancer.

How many marijuana smokers died from lung cancer last year? It's the same as the number of overdoses.

ZERO.

Big, fat fucking ZERO. Look it up.

get your head off your ass and educate yourself ( if there is any brain cells left in your stoned head):
Marijuana use and risk of lung cancer: a 40-year cohort study - Springer
This literature supports an increased exposure to tar in marijuana smoke compared with tobacco smoke based on comparable amounts of smoked contents and increased tar exposure associated with decreased marijuana potency in the proximal portion of a marijuana cigarette compared with the distal portion.

our primary finding provides initial longitudinal evidence that cannabis use might elevate the risk of lung cancer. In light of the widespread use of marijuana, especially among adolescents and young adults, our study provides important data for informing the risk–benefit calculus of marijuana smoking in medical, public-health, and drug-policy settings.

 

[Vox]

How many marijuana smokers died from lung cancer last year? It's the same as the number of overdoses.

ZERO.

Big, fat fucking ZERO. Look it up.

you can enjoy the testicular cancer causes by your pot usage as well:

Compared with never use, ever use of marijuana had a 2-fold increased risk (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.02-3.68

Population-based case-control study of recreational drug use and testis cancer risk confirms an association between marijuana use and nonseminoma risk - Lacson - 2012 - Cancer - Wiley Online Library

enjoy that joint

Wow. A "2-fold" RISK. Risk is NOT a diagnosis. How many of those people died from testicular cancer caused specifically by smoking marijuana?

And if smoking marijuana causes cancer, then why do doctors prescribe it to cancer patients?

I knew you are an idiot and do not understand the terminology of the scientific research.

Which only proves the initial postulate - constant stoning has killed your cognitive abilities.

next.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Simple question...

Do I have the free choice to smoke it?

 

[Vox]

and idiot KNB does not even know that HEMP is not the same as pot for smoking

why am I NOT surprised

DERP! Good one, Vox!

No, marijuana and hemp do not have the same traits. But the US Federal government doesn't care. That's why industrial hemp is illegal as a drug, and 99% of the "marijuana" destroyed by the DEA each year is wild hemp.

And the licenses that allowed Americans to grow hemp to protect your freedom during World War II read, "Producer of Marihuana".

Hemp and Marijuana are Cannabis Sativa Linn.

Hemp has been used for ages and if even the plant is of the same genus it is not the same active substance in the plant which may or may not cause the impairments. smoking HEMP won't get you high as it does not contain enough THC.

 

[KNB]

yes, it does. as other smoking.

but you won't get adenocarcinoma of the lungs as you will die before that - your heavy pot usage will bring you the other ailments much more pleasant than lung cancer.

How many marijuana smokers died from lung cancer last year? It's the same as the number of overdoses.

ZERO.

Big, fat fucking ZERO. Look it up.

get your head off your ass and educate yourself ( if there is any brain cells left in your stoned head):
Marijuana use and risk of lung cancer: a 40-year cohort study - Springer
This literature supports an increased exposure to tar in marijuana smoke compared with tobacco smoke based on comparable amounts of smoked contents and increased tar exposure associated with decreased marijuana potency in the proximal portion of a marijuana cigarette compared with the distal portion.

our primary finding provides initial longitudinal evidence that cannabis use might elevate the risk of lung cancer. In light of the widespread use of marijuana, especially among adolescents and young adults, our study provides important data for informing the risk–benefit calculus of marijuana smoking in medical, public-health, and drug-policy settings.

"MIGHT elevate the RISK". Read your own links. Understand the information.

All the drug war has is "might", "may", "possibly", "could perhaps", etc. etc. But there is never any definite link reported.

The fact is that no one has died from smoking marijuana. EVER. Not once in the entire history of recorded medical science. NOT ONE. EVER.

And marijuana doesn't have to be smoked. How much tar gets into a person's lungs from eating a brownie or drinking a cup of tea? There are also vaporizers which remove the majority of carcinogens by eliminating combustion altogether.

 

[KNB]

Hemp has been used for ages and if even the plant is of the same genus it is not the same active substance in the plant which may or may not cause the impairments. smoking HEMP won't get you high as it does not contain THC.

If hemp can't get anyone high, then why is hemp an illegal narcotic under the Controlled Substances Act? Why does the DEA go around the country cutting down hemp and burning it?

Industrial hemp has always been the real target of "Marihuana" prohibition.

 

[Vox]

*yawn*

you may stone yourself to death - I don't care - it's darwinism in action.

But it does not mean that the policies which support unlimited stoning of the youth should be supported.