the destruction of herman cain, from an election far far away.

[rightwinger]

Trump has gotten away with more transgressions than any candidate in history

Gary Hart was toast merely for being photographed with Donna Rice on his lap


Trump mocks POWs, Mocks the handicapped, is derisive towards women, openly brags about grabbing pussy, brags about not paying taxes....

Yet still moves on

Those are lies.


Trump mocked a grumpy old man who had insulted his supporters, trump mocked a vile reporter who deserved it, trump has mocked specific women who have attacked him, Trump has bragged about women being attracted to his wealth and fame (see definition of word "let"), and we all pay as little taxes as we can.

If McCain is grumpy and insults your supporters ...attack what he said, don't attack him for being captured in defense of his country

If a reporter says something you disagree with...attack what he said and why he is wrong, don't encourage your supporters to mock his handicap

If women say things you don't like...attack what they said, don't call them fat pigs, ugly or having their period

Like Michelle Obama said, its human decency

1. Your request that Republicans take the high road, while you dems fight dirty is rejected. McCain was a grumpy old man who attacked Trump supporters and was insulted back in turn.

2. YOur request that Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. The reporter's handicap was such that he FROZEN JOINTS, not spastic flailing. The media is lying about Trump mocking a disability. He was mocking the reporter who deserved it.

3. Your request that the Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. Megan Kelly betrayed her professional responsibility, behaved unethically and deserved to be called on her bullshit.

4. Meanwhile you libs are happy to personally smear just about EVERYONE who disagrees with you, one at a time or a half the country at a time. Or have you never considered the implication of calling someone a "racist"? Or "deplorable"? YOur don't get to sling so much vile mud and then whine when someone uses far less offensive language BACK at you.

Well, you do. But I am here to call you on it.

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

You don't see how it works...that is why you are a Trump supporter

If Trump disagrees with what McCain says then you attack what is said. Attacking those who endured torture in fighting for their country is NEVER an appropriate response

If you disagree with what a woman has said you fight her on what she says. Starting your argument with ..She is fat, she is ugly, she must be having her period...is not the way to win friends and influence people

 

[rightwinger]

2. YOur request that Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. The reporter's handicap was such that he FROZEN JOINTS, not spastic flailing. The media is lying about Trump mocking a disability. He was mocking the reporter who deserved it.

Trump not doing good impressions is not a defense

When you start a sentence with "Have you seen this guy?" It is clear what you are mocking
No one with a disability deserves to be mocked for it

As his impression of the guy did NOT match his disability, it is NOT clear what he was mocking.


Not surprisingly you lefties have spun it to in the worst possible light. Because you are dishonest.


There are other aspects of the man that it could be. The reporter is not solely his disability.

Have you seen this guy?

 

[NoNukes]

not that far away i think the phrase selective outrage will cover it.




KUHNER: The liberal lynching of Herman Cain - Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com/.../the-liberal-lynching-of-herman-...
The Washington Times
Nov 4, 2011 - Liberals are determined to destroy Herman Cain. The Republican presidential candidate is tied or ahead of the presumptive front-runner, ...
Herman Cain Must Be Destroyed - Banner Newspaper
bannernewspaper.com/herman-cain-must-be-destroyed-p1052-121.htm
Herman Cain Must Be Destroyed. by Paul R. Hollrah I remember it well. I remember the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision of May 1954.
'Know Your Place': Elite Media Target Herman Cain - Breitbart
www.breitbart.com/big.../elite-media-clarence-thomassing-herman-cain...
Breitbart News
Mar 1, 2013 - 'Know Your Place': Elite Media Target Herman Cain. ... others into “knowing their place,” the media targets “runners” for personal destruction.

Who?

 

[Correll]

Your continued whining is noted and dismissed. Herman Cain is still responsible for his actions.

Only to his wife.

The media was WAY out of line.

Says you. Cain's actions said othewise.

Cain was a marginal candidate, who quickly disappeared from the race

Problem with Republicans is they have too many candidates unwilling to drop out. That is how we got Trump

It was a packed field. Lots of candidates disappeared quickly from the race. Your dismissal of Cain is just you not being willing to face the fact that your belief system of the GOP being racist, is complete, self serving bullshit.


Sure. The Establishment types split the anti-Trump vote this time.


Makes up for when Hucklebee split the Conservative vote and gave us McCain.



We Republicans have primaries where the voters actually get to influence the election. I know that is weird for a dem.

Republicans are unable to say...enough

It hurt them in 2012, when clear choice Romney had to continue to fight against candidates who did not have a chance like Backmann, Santorum and Gingrich

It destroyed the party in 2016 when they ended up selecting a totally unqualified candidate because Cruz, Rubio, Kasich and Christie refused to drop out

The Party leadership does not have the power to dictate how the primaries will go. The voters get to pick among the available candidates and the candidates can stay in as long as they have support from the voters.


I understand that this is alien to you.


Trump is politically inexperienced, but his platform is the very best by far of the available options.


BOth in terms of winnability and what would be best for the nation if he won.

 

[Correll]

2. YOur request that Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. The reporter's handicap was such that he FROZEN JOINTS, not spastic flailing. The media is lying about Trump mocking a disability. He was mocking the reporter who deserved it.

Trump not doing good impressions is not a defense

When you start a sentence with "Have you seen this guy?" It is clear what you are mocking
No one with a disability deserves to be mocked for it

As his impression of the guy did NOT match his disability, it is NOT clear what he was mocking.


Not surprisingly you lefties have spun it to in the worst possible light. Because you are dishonest.


There are other aspects of the man that it could be. The reporter is not solely his disability.

Have you seen this guy?

Have you?

 

[Correll]

Those are lies.


Trump mocked a grumpy old man who had insulted his supporters, trump mocked a vile reporter who deserved it, trump has mocked specific women who have attacked him, Trump has bragged about women being attracted to his wealth and fame (see definition of word "let"), and we all pay as little taxes as we can.

If McCain is grumpy and insults your supporters ...attack what he said, don't attack him for being captured in defense of his country

If a reporter says something you disagree with...attack what he said and why he is wrong, don't encourage your supporters to mock his handicap

If women say things you don't like...attack what they said, don't call them fat pigs, ugly or having their period

Like Michelle Obama said, its human decency

1. Your request that Republicans take the high road, while you dems fight dirty is rejected. McCain was a grumpy old man who attacked Trump supporters and was insulted back in turn.

2. YOur request that Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. The reporter's handicap was such that he FROZEN JOINTS, not spastic flailing. The media is lying about Trump mocking a disability. He was mocking the reporter who deserved it.

3. Your request that the Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. Megan Kelly betrayed her professional responsibility, behaved unethically and deserved to be called on her bullshit.

4. Meanwhile you libs are happy to personally smear just about EVERYONE who disagrees with you, one at a time or a half the country at a time. Or have you never considered the implication of calling someone a "racist"? Or "deplorable"? YOur don't get to sling so much vile mud and then whine when someone uses far less offensive language BACK at you.

Well, you do. But I am here to call you on it.

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

You don't see how it works...that is why you are a Trump supporter

If Trump disagrees with what McCain says then you attack what is said. Attacking those who endured torture in fighting for their country is NEVER an appropriate response

If you disagree with what a woman has said you fight her on what she says. Starting your argument with ..She is fat, she is ugly, she must be having her period...is not the way to win friends and influence people

Your pretense that insults are precision tools is absurd.

YOur pretense of taking the high road while engaged in constant vicious slander of vast portions of your fellow citizens is so dishonest as to gag a lawyer.

YOur pretense that our public discourse should be calm and civil while you and your base your whole strategy on panic mongering and personal attacks is deeply offensive.

 

[rightwinger]

Only to his wife.

The media was WAY out of line.

Says you. Cain's actions said othewise.

Cain was a marginal candidate, who quickly disappeared from the race

Problem with Republicans is they have too many candidates unwilling to drop out. That is how we got Trump

It was a packed field. Lots of candidates disappeared quickly from the race. Your dismissal of Cain is just you not being willing to face the fact that your belief system of the GOP being racist, is complete, self serving bullshit.


Sure. The Establishment types split the anti-Trump vote this time.


Makes up for when Hucklebee split the Conservative vote and gave us McCain.



We Republicans have primaries where the voters actually get to influence the election. I know that is weird for a dem.

Republicans are unable to say...enough

It hurt them in 2012, when clear choice Romney had to continue to fight against candidates who did not have a chance like Backmann, Santorum and Gingrich

It destroyed the party in 2016 when they ended up selecting a totally unqualified candidate because Cruz, Rubio, Kasich and Christie refused to drop out

The Party leadership does not have the power to dictate how the primaries will go. The voters get to pick among the available candidates and the candidates can stay in as long as they have support from the voters.


I understand that this is alien to you.


Trump is politically inexperienced, but his platform is the very best by far of the available options.


BOth in terms of winnability and what would be best for the nation if he won.

Even if his platform is achievable...Trump is totally unsuited for the job because of temperament, experience and intellect

 

[320 Years of History]

The very last thing either side could afford (especially the socialists who rely on that 90% black robotic votes) was a narrative that showed a black man who benefited from the OPPORTUNITIES provided by the free market.

??? What? Are not the successes of the people noted below enough to illustrate that blacks have gained from the opportunities provided by the free market?

• John Johnson
• Madame C.J. Walker
• Oprah Winfrey
• Reginald Lewis
• Arthur Gaston
• Booker T. Washington
• Maggie Walker
• Charles Clinton Spaulding
• Aaron McDuffie Moore
• John Merrick
  
• Frederick Patterson
• Charles Richard Patterson
  
• Robert Gordon
• William Alexander Leidesdorff, Jr.
  
• James Forten
• Sam Wilcox
• Frank McWorter
  
• All these people
• Anthony Johnson
• Paul Cuffee
• Thomas Jennings
• Lewis Temple
• Frederick Douglas
• George T. Downing
• The millions of black entrepreneurs who own law firms, medical practices, and all manners of other businesses

If there's any reason for which such a narrative is not needed is because there are ample examples of black entrepreneurship not only in American economic history, but also staring us in the face as we daily live and breathe.

 

[Correll]

Says you. Cain's actions said othewise.

Cain was a marginal candidate, who quickly disappeared from the race

Problem with Republicans is they have too many candidates unwilling to drop out. That is how we got Trump

It was a packed field. Lots of candidates disappeared quickly from the race. Your dismissal of Cain is just you not being willing to face the fact that your belief system of the GOP being racist, is complete, self serving bullshit.


Sure. The Establishment types split the anti-Trump vote this time.


Makes up for when Hucklebee split the Conservative vote and gave us McCain.



We Republicans have primaries where the voters actually get to influence the election. I know that is weird for a dem.

Republicans are unable to say...enough

It hurt them in 2012, when clear choice Romney had to continue to fight against candidates who did not have a chance like Backmann, Santorum and Gingrich

It destroyed the party in 2016 when they ended up selecting a totally unqualified candidate because Cruz, Rubio, Kasich and Christie refused to drop out

The Party leadership does not have the power to dictate how the primaries will go. The voters get to pick among the available candidates and the candidates can stay in as long as they have support from the voters.


I understand that this is alien to you.


Trump is politically inexperienced, but his platform is the very best by far of the available options.


BOth in terms of winnability and what would be best for the nation if he won.

Even if his platform is achievable...Trump is totally unsuited for the job because of temperament, experience and intellect

We were discussion the process of choosing candidates in the primaries.

Your personal opinion of Trump's platform or character is irrelevant as you are an extreme dem partisan.


My point was that republican voters such as myself had their reasons for who they support even past the point YOU approve of.

Your self serving opinion that the reasons are or should be race of gender based or even controlled by the party leadership is nothing but a reflection on your and your belief system.

They have nothing to do with us republicans.

 

[rightwinger]

Cain was a marginal candidate, who quickly disappeared from the race

Problem with Republicans is they have too many candidates unwilling to drop out. That is how we got Trump

It was a packed field. Lots of candidates disappeared quickly from the race. Your dismissal of Cain is just you not being willing to face the fact that your belief system of the GOP being racist, is complete, self serving bullshit.


Sure. The Establishment types split the anti-Trump vote this time.


Makes up for when Hucklebee split the Conservative vote and gave us McCain.



We Republicans have primaries where the voters actually get to influence the election. I know that is weird for a dem.

Republicans are unable to say...enough

It hurt them in 2012, when clear choice Romney had to continue to fight against candidates who did not have a chance like Backmann, Santorum and Gingrich

It destroyed the party in 2016 when they ended up selecting a totally unqualified candidate because Cruz, Rubio, Kasich and Christie refused to drop out

The Party leadership does not have the power to dictate how the primaries will go. The voters get to pick among the available candidates and the candidates can stay in as long as they have support from the voters.


I understand that this is alien to you.


Trump is politically inexperienced, but his platform is the very best by far of the available options.


BOth in terms of winnability and what would be best for the nation if he won.

Even if his platform is achievable...Trump is totally unsuited for the job because of temperament, experience and intellect

We were discussion the process of choosing candidates in the primaries.

Your personal opinion of Trump's platform or character is irrelevant as you are an extreme dem partisan.


My point was that republican voters such as myself had their reasons for who they support even past the point YOU approve of.

Your self serving opinion that the reasons are or should be race of gender based or even controlled by the party leadership is nothing but a reflection on your and your belief system.

They have nothing to do with us republicans.

Trumps character is relevant

His cut and paste platform became irrelevant months ago when it became painfully obvious that Trump was unsuited for the Presidency. His lack of moral standards, his lack of intellect, his inability to accept criticism without childish insults....all became issues as even his own party has proclaimed....don't vote for this bum

 

[Faun]

The "smear campaign" was Ginger White stepping forward to claim she and Cain had an affair.

If she had made that claim about a dem, it would have been a blip and that would have been the end of it.

As it was about a Republican the media made it their top story for weeks.

Gennifer Flowers proves you're insane.

https://m.youtube.com/results?q=gennifer flowers 1992&sm=3

4,000 results for the dem.

34,000 for the republican.

donald trump grabbing - YouTube


And only a fool would doubt that the tone of the pieces were very different depending on party affiliation.

Thanks for reminding me how nuts you are. 1992 was not only before youtube, it was before the Internet as we know it today. Comparing the number of hits from an incident in 1992 with one from a week or two ago reveals a) how desperate you are; b) how badly you lost this argument; and c) how your claim that it would have been a "blip" had it been a Democrat stems from a deranged rightie who sees the world through rightard-tinted glasses.

John Edwards, Gary Hart, Anthony Weiner, among many others, proves you wrong.

NOt my fault you felt you had to go back that far for a good comparison scandal.

A) your Trump-style whining is noted.
B) proved you wrong
C) Weiner's scandal is even more recent than Cain's.

 

[Faun]

Blame for what? Cain stepping down? That was his choice.

Blame for their actions.

Much like the repubicans got slammed for their actions. Before they were taught that sex doesn't matter.


THe media still has that slam coming.

Your continued whining is noted and dismissed. Herman Cain is still responsible for his actions.

Only to his wife.

The media was WAY out of line.

Says you. Cain's actions said othewise.

That fact that the media's vile actions were successful in no way supports your position that they were in the right to do what they did.

Try to be less stupid.

You're fucking deranged.

Ginger White came forward to claim she had a 13 year affair with Herman Cain. As a candidate for president, that was a yuge news story and the press rightfully covered it. Including rightwing news. That's not "vile," that's the press doing their job. And as you've been shown, the press has covered accusations of sexual misconduct by many presidential candidates, regardless of political parties.

The reality is you're a devoted Crazy Donald sycophant and it burns you no end because it's happening to him.

Guess what...?

Tough shit.

 

[Faun]

1. Credible.

2. Cain was the leader is the polls in a crowed field, until he was dogpiled.

3. HE did. You are a race baiting asshole.

1) Uh, no, when you say you saw someone's dick and describe it wrong, you have no crediblity.

2) Cain was never leading in the polls. And he was crashing and burning before we found out he was groping the White women.

3) Trump refuses to denounce Duke.

Donald Trump's absurd claim that he knows nothing about former KKK leader David Duke

1. When you believe BIll Clinton in a sexual harassment case, you have no credibility. Jones was credible.

2. YOur own graph shows Cain was leading in the polls for two good months. You are so biased that you can't even objectively read a graph.

3. Yes, he did. He did before that incident. HE did after that incident. The reporters are fucking assholes for even asking the question, and you are a dupe of Duke's by supporting the idea that he is significant.

Jones was not credible. Her suit was thrown out due to lack of merit.

Actually, the case was initially dismissed because the Judge claimed that Jones could show no harm.

Which is nonsense. And VERY DIFFERENT from "lack of merit".


Were you lied to, or were you lying?

Plaintiff does not have a viable § 1985(3) claim in this case as the court has determined that her § 1983 quid pro quo and hostile work environment sexual harassment claims are without merit and warrant a grant of summary judgment. Absent an underlying violation of federal law, there can be no actionable claim alleging a conspiracy to achieve that end.

https://partners.nytimes.com/library/politics/040298clinton-ruling.pdf

 

[Faun]

3. Whites have been and still are, by a good margin the majority of this country and men are far more likely to run for office than women. To that that is a strike against republicans just shows that you are bad at math.

Okay, but the Democrats elected a black man and are about to elect a woman. So it seems they have this down.

But you keep nominating white men.

You present me, and/or the GOP with a woman or a black or anyone or anything, that has a set of policies or a resume or a campaign that fits what we want out of a candidate, and we will support that candidate.


We judge candidates based on what they have to offer.


Your dem inability to understand that can be seen in how you kept trying to make an issue of Romney's religion and how you failed at doing so.


WE have that down, ie judging candidates, (or people) on their actions and/or the content of their character, not their skin color or their gender.


But you keep checking off boxes.

Bullshit. Many on the right just can't seem to find any blacks or women they think are as capable as white men.

Actually to choose a certain individual candidate over another, they should be MORE capable than the other candidate. You dumb ass.


Do you think that Ben Carson was more capable than Donald Trump?

I actually don't care. It was a trick question.

Ben Carson's appeal was more to social conservatives, my support of Donald Trump stemmed from his Trade and Immigration issues.


That you assume that my decision had ANYTHING TO do with the skin color or gender of the candidates in question, is just you having a bad opinion of me. A completely unsupported opinion.


I would LIKE for the final candidate to be a woman or a black. Just to see the pretzel logic that you libs would twist your little brains in to rationalize it away.

BUT, I will not pass over, imo, better candidate in favor of a lesser candidate based on such petty concerns.



Do you have any doubt that if it came down to Ben Carson vs Hillary Clinton that there would be ANY hesitation on my part for voting for the "black"?

Rhetorical question. Only a complete moron would think so.

You've stated nothing which counters my point that many on the right don't think blacks or women are as capable as white men.

And if you could understand what others write, you probably would have noticed I didn't say that about you personally.

 

[Faun]

Trump has gotten away with more transgressions than any candidate in history

Gary Hart was toast merely for being photographed with Donna Rice on his lap


Trump mocks POWs, Mocks the handicapped, is derisive towards women, openly brags about grabbing pussy, brags about not paying taxes....

Yet still moves on

Those are lies.


Trump mocked a grumpy old man who had insulted his supporters, trump mocked a vile reporter who deserved it, trump has mocked specific women who have attacked him, Trump has bragged about women being attracted to his wealth and fame (see definition of word "let"), and we all pay as little taxes as we can.

If McCain is grumpy and insults your supporters ...attack what he said, don't attack him for being captured in defense of his country

If a reporter says something you disagree with...attack what he said and why he is wrong, don't encourage your supporters to mock his handicap

If women say things you don't like...attack what they said, don't call them fat pigs, ugly or having their period

Like Michelle Obama said, its human decency

1. Your request that Republicans take the high road, while you dems fight dirty is rejected. McCain was a grumpy old man who attacked Trump supporters and was insulted back in turn.

2. YOur request that Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. The reporter's handicap was such that he FROZEN JOINTS, not spastic flailing. The media is lying about Trump mocking a disability. He was mocking the reporter who deserved it.

3. Your request that the Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. Megan Kelly betrayed her professional responsibility, behaved unethically and deserved to be called on her bullshit.

4. Meanwhile you libs are happy to personally smear just about EVERYONE who disagrees with you, one at a time or a half the country at a time. Or have you never considered the implication of calling someone a "racist"? Or "deplorable"? YOur don't get to sling so much vile mud and then whine when someone uses far less offensive language BACK at you.

Well, you do. But I am here to call you on it.

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too fucking rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

 

[Correll]

It was a packed field. Lots of candidates disappeared quickly from the race. Your dismissal of Cain is just you not being willing to face the fact that your belief system of the GOP being racist, is complete, self serving bullshit.


Sure. The Establishment types split the anti-Trump vote this time.


Makes up for when Hucklebee split the Conservative vote and gave us McCain.



We Republicans have primaries where the voters actually get to influence the election. I know that is weird for a dem.

Republicans are unable to say...enough

It hurt them in 2012, when clear choice Romney had to continue to fight against candidates who did not have a chance like Backmann, Santorum and Gingrich

It destroyed the party in 2016 when they ended up selecting a totally unqualified candidate because Cruz, Rubio, Kasich and Christie refused to drop out

The Party leadership does not have the power to dictate how the primaries will go. The voters get to pick among the available candidates and the candidates can stay in as long as they have support from the voters.


I understand that this is alien to you.


Trump is politically inexperienced, but his platform is the very best by far of the available options.


BOth in terms of winnability and what would be best for the nation if he won.

Even if his platform is achievable...Trump is totally unsuited for the job because of temperament, experience and intellect

We were discussion the process of choosing candidates in the primaries.

Your personal opinion of Trump's platform or character is irrelevant as you are an extreme dem partisan.


My point was that republican voters such as myself had their reasons for who they support even past the point YOU approve of.

Your self serving opinion that the reasons are or should be race of gender based or even controlled by the party leadership is nothing but a reflection on your and your belief system.

They have nothing to do with us republicans.

Trumps character is relevant

His cut and paste platform became irrelevant months ago when it became painfully obvious that Trump was unsuited for the Presidency. His lack of moral standards, his lack of intellect, his inability to accept criticism without childish insults....all became issues as even his own party has proclaimed....don't vote for this bum

We were discussion the process of choosing candidates in the primaries.

IN that, your OPINION of Trump's character is irrelevant. The opinion of Republican primary voters on his character would be relevant.

Convenient you "forgot" that part of my post.

And by convenient, I mean you dishonesty ignored everything I said in order to go for the bullshit gotcha.

Fuck you.

 

[Correll]

3. Whites have been and still are, by a good margin the majority of this country and men are far more likely to run for office than women. To that that is a strike against republicans just shows that you are bad at math.

Okay, but the Democrats elected a black man and are about to elect a woman. So it seems they have this down.

But you keep nominating white men.

You present me, and/or the GOP with a woman or a black or anyone or anything, that has a set of policies or a resume or a campaign that fits what we want out of a candidate, and we will support that candidate.


We judge candidates based on what they have to offer.


Your dem inability to understand that can be seen in how you kept trying to make an issue of Romney's religion and how you failed at doing so.


WE have that down, ie judging candidates, (or people) on their actions and/or the content of their character, not their skin color or their gender.


But you keep checking off boxes.

Bullshit. Many on the right just can't seem to find any blacks or women they think are as capable as white men.

Actually to choose a certain individual candidate over another, they should be MORE capable than the other candidate. You dumb ass.


Do you think that Ben Carson was more capable than Donald Trump?

I actually don't care. It was a trick question.

Ben Carson's appeal was more to social conservatives, my support of Donald Trump stemmed from his Trade and Immigration issues.


That you assume that my decision had ANYTHING TO do with the skin color or gender of the candidates in question, is just you having a bad opinion of me. A completely unsupported opinion.


I would LIKE for the final candidate to be a woman or a black. Just to see the pretzel logic that you libs would twist your little brains in to rationalize it away.

BUT, I will not pass over, imo, better candidate in favor of a lesser candidate based on such petty concerns.



Do you have any doubt that if it came down to Ben Carson vs Hillary Clinton that there would be ANY hesitation on my part for voting for the "black"?

Rhetorical question. Only a complete moron would think so.

You've stated nothing which counters my point that many on the right don't think blacks or women are as capable as white men.

And if you could understand what others write, you probably would have noticed I didn't say that about you personally.

I was discussing the ACTUAL way that we on the right make our voting decisions.

EVERYTHING I said contradicted your biased and partisan bullshit theory on what you think your enemies do.

ANd your insulting of a group that I am a member of means that you are insulting me.

Screw you, dumb ass.

 

[Correll]

Those are lies.


Trump mocked a grumpy old man who had insulted his supporters, trump mocked a vile reporter who deserved it, trump has mocked specific women who have attacked him, Trump has bragged about women being attracted to his wealth and fame (see definition of word "let"), and we all pay as little taxes as we can.

If McCain is grumpy and insults your supporters ...attack what he said, don't attack him for being captured in defense of his country

If a reporter says something you disagree with...attack what he said and why he is wrong, don't encourage your supporters to mock his handicap

If women say things you don't like...attack what they said, don't call them fat pigs, ugly or having their period

Like Michelle Obama said, its human decency

1. Your request that Republicans take the high road, while you dems fight dirty is rejected. McCain was a grumpy old man who attacked Trump supporters and was insulted back in turn.

2. YOur request that Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. The reporter's handicap was such that he FROZEN JOINTS, not spastic flailing. The media is lying about Trump mocking a disability. He was mocking the reporter who deserved it.

3. Your request that the Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. Megan Kelly betrayed her professional responsibility, behaved unethically and deserved to be called on her bullshit.

4. Meanwhile you libs are happy to personally smear just about EVERYONE who disagrees with you, one at a time or a half the country at a time. Or have you never considered the implication of calling someone a "racist"? Or "deplorable"? YOur don't get to sling so much vile mud and then whine when someone uses far less offensive language BACK at you.

Well, you do. But I am here to call you on it.

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too fucking rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A fucking righttard?

You are a fucking asshole.

 

[rightwinger]

If McCain is grumpy and insults your supporters ...attack what he said, don't attack him for being captured in defense of his country

If a reporter says something you disagree with...attack what he said and why he is wrong, don't encourage your supporters to mock his handicap

If women say things you don't like...attack what they said, don't call them fat pigs, ugly or having their period

Like Michelle Obama said, its human decency

1. Your request that Republicans take the high road, while you dems fight dirty is rejected. McCain was a grumpy old man who attacked Trump supporters and was insulted back in turn.

2. YOur request that Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. The reporter's handicap was such that he FROZEN JOINTS, not spastic flailing. The media is lying about Trump mocking a disability. He was mocking the reporter who deserved it.

3. Your request that the Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. Megan Kelly betrayed her professional responsibility, behaved unethically and deserved to be called on her bullshit.

4. Meanwhile you libs are happy to personally smear just about EVERYONE who disagrees with you, one at a time or a half the country at a time. Or have you never considered the implication of calling someone a "racist"? Or "deplorable"? YOur don't get to sling so much vile mud and then whine when someone uses far less offensive language BACK at you.

Well, you do. But I am here to call you on it.

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too fucking rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A fucking righttard?

You are a fucking asshole.

President Obama says you should stop whining

 

[Correll]

Blame for their actions.

Much like the repubicans got slammed for their actions. Before they were taught that sex doesn't matter.


THe media still has that slam coming.

Your continued whining is noted and dismissed. Herman Cain is still responsible for his actions.

Only to his wife.

The media was WAY out of line.

Says you. Cain's actions said othewise.

That fact that the media's vile actions were successful in no way supports your position that they were in the right to do what they did.

Try to be less stupid.

You're fucking deranged.

Ginger White came forward to claim she had a 13 year affair with Herman Cain. As a candidate for president, that was a yuge news story and the press rightfully covered it. Including rightwing news. That's not "vile," that's the press doing their job. And as you've been shown, the press has covered accusations of sexual misconduct by many presidential candidates, regardless of political parties.

The reality is you're a devoted Crazy Donald sycophant and it burns you no end because it's happening to him.

Guess what...?

Tough shit.

Sex doesn't matter. YOu libs taught us that.


All you are doing now is being hypocrites.