The DNC did the right thing by opposing Sanders

Sanders is not really a Democrat. He's been an independent for nearly 40 years. He's a socialist, not a Democrat. The party did the right thing by opposing his bid to represent the Democratic party. The parties should oppose candidates who don't represent the party and/or who are counter to the party's best interests. The DNC did what the RNC should have done with Trump from the get-go.


Yes, Democracy is sooooo overrated.

Democracy has nothing to do with it. Political parties govern themselves. You're not entitled to whatever you want from them, just because you want it.

Really!!!!!!!!!!!

Democracy has everything to do with it. Now you don't want the Primaries because they're a democratic process. Why don't you just go with all Super_Delegates, bought and paid for?
 
Really!!!!!!!!!!!

Democracy has everything to do with it. Now you don't want the Primaries because they're a democratic process. Why don't you just go with all Super_Delegates, bought and paid for?

As a matter of fact I do think we should get rid of the primaries. I think that Donald Trump shows us that primaries are a failed nomination system.
 
Wrong.

First of all the DNC is expected to be neutral. Second of all Bernie Sanders has been a de facto Democrat for 40 years.

Third of all Bernie Sanders, of all the players in this race so far, turns out to be the one with the most integrity on either side.

That's what makes those of us who support him even more right in the end.
We THOUGHT he had the most integrity.. But alas, he fooled everyone...

Indeed. Sanders is supposed to be the one who has integrity and isn't sucked into the two party corruption. But he's spent nearly 40 years as an independent who has wholesale caucused with the Democrats. Now he has endorsed Clinton, after all the things he said about how she's unfit. How is that not the exact same partisan fuckery as the rest of them?
 
First of all the DNC is expected to be neutral.

And the President is expected to be intelligent. So I guess Hillary is out.

Second of all Bernie Sanders has been a de facto Democrat for 40 years.

False. He's been a socialist, and an independent for 40 years. Are you claiming that socialists are de factor Democrats? Your problem is that you see things in binary terms. You are so crippled by the false dilemma that you can't get it through your head that it's not an either/or proposition.

Third of all Bernie Sanders, of all the players in this race so far, turns out to be the one with the most integrity on either side.

Well then, he's definitely not a Democrat.

That's what makes those of us who support him even more right in the end.

This isn't a question of whether or not you like him. Like him all you want. Support him all you want. Hell, go vote for him in November if that's what makes you happy. Nobody can stop you from supporting him or from voting for him. None of that is at issue here. And none of that changes the fact that the DNC was right to want a real Democrat to be their nominee. Someone who has been with the party through thick and thin.

How about this....how would you feel if Donald Trump decided to run as a Democrat?

He caucuses with the Democrats. That makes him a de facto Democrat.

It makes him a de facto Independent who uses Democrats for the convenience of it.

Senate rules require
Sanders is not really a Democrat. He's been an independent for nearly 40 years. He's a socialist, not a Democrat. The party did the right thing by opposing his bid to represent the Democratic party. The parties should oppose candidates who don't represent the party and/or who are counter to the party's best interests. The DNC did what the RNC should have done with Trump from the get-go.
The only difference between Democrats and Bernie Sanders is Democrats are on the take from Wall Street and foreign entities. If Sanders were to win he'd become just as corrupt.

lol, a foreigner who supports Trump wants to school us on integrity.
 
Really!!!!!!!!!!!

Democracy has everything to do with it. Now you don't want the Primaries because they're a democratic process. Why don't you just go with all Super_Delegates, bought and paid for?

As a matter of fact I do think we should get rid of the primaries. I think that Donald Trump shows us that primaries are a failed nomination system.

Of course you do. And if anyone disagrees with your appointment of the King they're wrong.
 
Hell NO DNC We won't vote for Hillary!
Hell NO DNC We won't vote for Hillary!
Everything Dems hoped would happen to Repubs is happening to the Dems. They are the split party, they have no integrity, it's one dirty gimmick after another. A new scandal every day. Bernie protesters hate Hillary more than they hate Trump...

images
 
A couple generations ago, the conventions were where the candidates were selected. The party leaders would sit in "smoke filled rooms" and basically decide who was going to be the nominee. But the delegates on both sides rebelled, claiming that this system was anti-democratic and gave the voters basically no say in who the nominee would be. So the rules were changes to make the system more democratic, but in the process, it was left vulnerable to various sorts of gamesmanship. For example, Barry won in 2008, despite most Democrats preferring HRC. Trump wins this year, despite most Republicans favoring a REAL Republican. So you see what we end up with: candidates that in almost every case, a majority of the party members DO NOT WANT.

But the national committees are SUPPOSED to be neutral, and not support or oppose any individual candidate who is running in the Party's primary. There was a LOT of pressure on the Republican side for the party to oppose the Donald, who is neither Conservative nor Republican, but they let the chips fall.

It's OK for DW-S to want HRC to win, but she cannot use her position to help make that happen. It is thoroughly disreputable, dishonest, and she needed to be removed once this came out, one way or another.

And I personally do not like the Clinton campaign trying to change the story from a corrupt DNC to "the Russians did it!" It doesn't matter who sprung the leak, what matters is what was disclosed as a result of the leaks.
 
First of all the DNC is expected to be neutral.

And the President is expected to be intelligent. So I guess Hillary is out.

Second of all Bernie Sanders has been a de facto Democrat for 40 years.

False. He's been a socialist, and an independent for 40 years. Are you claiming that socialists are de factor Democrats? Your problem is that you see things in binary terms. You are so crippled by the false dilemma that you can't get it through your head that it's not an either/or proposition.

Third of all Bernie Sanders, of all the players in this race so far, turns out to be the one with the most integrity on either side.

Well then, he's definitely not a Democrat.

That's what makes those of us who support him even more right in the end.

This isn't a question of whether or not you like him. Like him all you want. Support him all you want. Hell, go vote for him in November if that's what makes you happy. Nobody can stop you from supporting him or from voting for him. None of that is at issue here. And none of that changes the fact that the DNC was right to want a real Democrat to be their nominee. Someone who has been with the party through thick and thin.

How about this....how would you feel if Donald Trump decided to run as a Democrat?

He caucuses with the Democrats. That makes him a de facto Democrat.

It makes him a de facto Independent who uses Democrats for the convenience of it.

Senate rules require
Sanders is not really a Democrat. He's been an independent for nearly 40 years. He's a socialist, not a Democrat. The party did the right thing by opposing his bid to represent the Democratic party. The parties should oppose candidates who don't represent the party and/or who are counter to the party's best interests. The DNC did what the RNC should have done with Trump from the get-go.
The only difference between Democrats and Bernie Sanders is Democrats are on the take from Wall Street and foreign entities. If Sanders were to win he'd become just as corrupt.

lol, a foreigner who supports Trump wants to school us on integrity.
Looks, retard.....I was born in America. I don't post my actual address because I have my reasons, and besides, the address I use sounded funnier. And besides, there are plenty of US citizens who live and work in the UK. You're just too stupid to realize that. BTW, anyone who lives in NY has to have a screw loose anyway, where being broke all the time is acceptable.
 
Really!!!!!!!!!!!

Democracy has everything to do with it. Now you don't want the Primaries because they're a democratic process. Why don't you just go with all Super_Delegates, bought and paid for?

As a matter of fact I do think we should get rid of the primaries. I think that Donald Trump shows us that primaries are a failed nomination system.

Of course you do. And if anyone disagrees with your appointment of the King they're wrong.

Was your "Super_Delegates" comment supposed to be a clue as to your real username?
 
The DNC never "opposed" sanders. That is, they never actually did anything to him. The worst they did was talk mean about him in emails.

And that was after Sanders started demonizing the DNC. Golly, the DNC didn't like a guy who was screaming they were all corrupt. Shocking. But after that, the DNC still didn't do anything bad to him.

So why are all of you Hillary-haters lying so big by claiming the DNC rigged something?
 
But the national committees are SUPPOSED to be neutral, and not support or oppose any individual candidate who is running in the Party's primary.

False. The national committee is supposed to decide who their party's candidate will be.
 
Wrong.

First of all the DNC is expected to be neutral. Second of all Bernie Sanders has been a de facto Democrat for 40 years.

Third of all Bernie Sanders, of all the players in this race so far, turns out to be the one with the most integrity on either side.

That's what makes those of us who support him even more right in the end.
We THOUGHT he had the most integrity.. But alas, he fooled everyone...

Indeed. Sanders is supposed to be the one who has integrity and isn't sucked into the two party corruption. But he's spent nearly 40 years as an independent who has wholesale caucused with the Democrats. Now he has endorsed Clinton, after all the things he said about how she's unfit. How is that not the exact same partisan fuckery as the rest of them?
So Sanders should run Independent now and revoke his endorsement? That would absolutely destroy Clinton. Sanders is a man of his word and is endorsing the Democrat nominee as he said he would the first day of his campaign. And all you can do is shit on him for it? So I guess since Sanders has no integrity we shouldn't vote for his Clinton endorsement. Ok thanks for the advice.
 
So Sanders should run Independent now and revoke his endorsement? That would absolutely destroy Clinton. Sanders is a man of his word and is endorsing the Democrat nominee as he said he would the first day of his campaign. And all you can do is shit on him for it? So I guess since Sanders has no integrity we shouldn't vote for his Clinton endorsement. Ok thanks for the advice.

Would you remove your mouth from your penis long enough to pay attention, please?

If Sanders wanted to run for President he should have done so as an Independent from the beginning, or start his own party. As for his integrity, that went out the door with his endorsement of Clinton as far as I'm concerned. And anyone who plans to vote for Clinton, whether because of Sanders endorsement or because the tea leaves told them to, is a fucking idiot.
 
Sanders is not really a Democrat. He's been an independent for nearly 40 years. He's a socialist, not a Democrat. The party did the right thing by opposing his bid to represent the Democratic party. The parties should oppose candidates who don't represent the party and/or who are counter to the party's best interests. The DNC did what the RNC should have done with Trump from the get-go.

So the party needs to ignore the will of the people? Are you insane? I'm a Trump supporter, but I'll take a socialist like Bernie in office over Hillary with the knowledge that votes count.
 
Sanders is not really a Democrat. He's been an independent for nearly 40 years. He's a socialist, not a Democrat. The party did the right thing by opposing his bid to represent the Democratic party. The parties should oppose candidates who don't represent the party and/or who are counter to the party's best interests. The DNC did what the RNC should have done with Trump from the get-go.

So the party needs to ignore the will of the people? Are you insane? I'm a Trump supporter, but I'll take a socialist like Bernie in office over Hillary with the knowledge that votes count.

This "will of the people" line is BULLSHIT!! Parties pick their candidates, not "the people."
 
Wrong.

First of all the DNC is expected to be neutral. Second of all Bernie Sanders has been a de facto Democrat for 40 years.

Third of all Bernie Sanders, of all the players in this race so far, turns out to be the one with the most integrity on either side.

That's what makes those of us who support him even more right in the end.

1. Debbie may have cost her party the election

2. If only Bernie didn't go so far , free this and that ...so many more would have jumped on that wagon...or maybe they did but with what Debbie did we will never know.


.
 
Sanders is not really a Democrat. He's been an independent for nearly 40 years. He's a socialist, not a Democrat. The party did the right thing by opposing his bid to represent the Democratic party. The parties should oppose candidates who don't represent the party and/or who are counter to the party's best interests. The DNC did what the RNC should have done with Trump from the get-go.

So the party needs to ignore the will of the people? Are you insane? I'm a Trump supporter, but I'll take a socialist like Bernie in office over Hillary with the knowledge that votes count.

This "will of the people" line is BULLSHIT!! Parties pick their candidates, not "the people."

Which is why Bernie Sander and Donald Trump did so well. People want to know their votes count.
 
If only Bernie didn't go so far , free this and that ...so many more would have jumped on that wagon...

Yeah, he should have totally lied his ass off about his real intentions. BTW, what you call "go so far" is exactly what sets him apart from being a Democrat.
 
Sanders is not really a Democrat. He's been an independent for nearly 40 years. He's a socialist, not a Democrat. The party did the right thing by opposing his bid to represent the Democratic party. The parties should oppose candidates who don't represent the party and/or who are counter to the party's best interests. The DNC did what the RNC should have done with Trump from the get-go.

So the party needs to ignore the will of the people? Are you insane? I'm a Trump supporter, but I'll take a socialist like Bernie in office over Hillary with the knowledge that votes count.

This "will of the people" line is BULLSHIT!! Parties pick their candidates, not "the people."

Which is why Bernie Sander and Donald Trump did so well. People want to know their votes count.

Nomination for dumbest post of the week.
 

Forum List

Back
Top