JoeB131
Diamond Member
Okay, some of want to live in the 21st century, not the 18th.Nope. I want the Federal Government to revert back to it's proper Constitutional mandates, PERIOD!.
I'm sure you miss witch burnings, too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, some of want to live in the 21st century, not the 18th.Nope. I want the Federal Government to revert back to it's proper Constitutional mandates, PERIOD!.
The Senate was much more accountable to the people the way it was elected prior to the amendment. State Legislatures could recall a Senator at any time.
I don't know why you would just assume that completely changing the conditions for victory in Presidential campaigns would necessarily benefit one party or the other, based on results of how elections are run currently.
But our system doesn't "Work", that's the thing. Trump was utterly unfit for office (and still is) and was rejected by the people, but he got in and fuck up, well, pretty much anything he touched.its just the way our system works,
You’ are either being intentionally obtuse or you are just too stupid to grasp that election results are in large part driven by campaign strategies which are determined by how a candidate wins the election.Well, it's easy. There are more people who vote Democratic than Republican. The GOP hasn't won a national popular vote since 2004, and then only barely, after convincing everyone there was an Arab hiding under their beds.
Logically, if every vote counted, we wouldn't have 66% voter turnout, we'd have 90% voter turnout, and that would benefit Democrats.
But our system doesn't "Work", that's the thing. Trump was utterly unfit for office (and still is) and was rejected by the people, but he got in and fuck up, well, pretty much anything he touched.
So you have no idea how we used to elect Senators then, but know that how it was done previously is not as good as it is now.Um, not even sure if that is logical, even for you.
It seems that direct election makes them accountable, not election by a bunch of partisan hacks.
Okay, some of want to live in the 21st century, not the 18th.
I'm sure you miss witch burnings, too.
Not as much as you think.You’ are either being intentionally obtuse or you are just too stupid to grasp that election results are in large part driven by campaign strategies which are determined by how a candidate wins the election.
I know exactly how it was previously done.So you have no idea how we used to elect Senators then, but know that how it was done previously is not as good as it is now.
So you want big daddy government to wipe your pathetic little pussy ass? Gotcha. The Founders were right. You ate wrong.Okay, some of want to live in the 21st century, not the 18th.
I'm sure you miss witch burnings, too.
And you need to leave MY country, Communist shitbag.I know exactly how it was previously done.
Fortunately, the people wanted to directly elect them, and we are all better off for it.
Guy, the Founding Slave Owners did not shit marble. They did not have very good ideas, which is why the constitution has had so many amendment and we need a few more.
No,So you want big daddy government to wipe your pathetic little pussy ass? Gotcha. The Founders were right. You ate wrong.
Nope. We need another Holy Ghost revival like we did in the 19th and 20th centuries.No,
But I like having indoor plumbing and sanitation systems, as opposed to the founders, who all shit in chamber pots and outhouses.
I like that the water I drink has been purified more than anything I would pull out of a well like the founders did.
I like the fact that when my wife and I had a health scare, we were able to access state of the art medical care rather than relying on leeches and herbs like the Founders did.
I would love to create a "libetarian paradise" with no government, and make you shitheads live in it for a few months. You'd be begging to come back.