Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well that is encouraging, particularly if this fight stretches out a long long time.SCOTUS ruled that there can be no mandate, but the current content of the Act says there is a mandate. That must be changed, and Congress must change that...and vote on that.Wait wait wait....
Please explain that. I haven't gotten a take like that before.
SCOTUS also ruled that the federal government cannot force states to do as they say with a penalty of losing ALL Federal Medicaid funds. The Act currently states that, though. That must be changed as well, and Congress must change that...and vote on that.
The make up of Congress is different now. Now, I hope that these changes must take place in the House first. I can't recall off hand if that is the case (and I would look, but I have to get to the airport). I suspect that the House gets it first, as usual.
I heard there's already a motion afoot in the House to strike it down. It probably won't pass there, but it could, but never get past the Senate.
Well, then it's stuck until they CAN get it fixed.Well that is encouraging, particularly if this fight stretches out a long long time.SCOTUS ruled that there can be no mandate, but the current content of the Act says there is a mandate. That must be changed, and Congress must change that...and vote on that.
SCOTUS also ruled that the federal government cannot force states to do as they say with a penalty of losing ALL Federal Medicaid funds. The Act currently states that, though. That must be changed as well, and Congress must change that...and vote on that.
The make up of Congress is different now. Now, I hope that these changes must take place in the House first. I can't recall off hand if that is the case (and I would look, but I have to get to the airport). I suspect that the House gets it first, as usual.
I heard there's already a motion afoot in the House to strike it down. It probably won't pass there, but it could, but never get past the Senate.
![]()
Lie back and think of England.pass this around folks now that we know ObamaCare is now ObamaTAX
George Stephanopoulos Interviews Obama - Obamacare - YouTube
Lie back and think of England.pass this around folks now that we know ObamaCare is now ObamaTAX
George Stephanopoulos Interviews Obama - Obamacare - YouTube![]()
Unfair and oppressive taxation has been the cause of most revolutions in the world.Lie back and think of England.pass this around folks now that we know ObamaCare is now ObamaTAX
George Stephanopoulos Interviews Obama - Obamacare - YouTube![]()
King George III's revenge on the upstart colonists?
Unfair and oppressive taxation has been the cause of most revolutions in the world.Lie back and think of England.![]()
King George III's revenge on the upstart colonists?
Which pattern? 1848? 1893? or 1929?Unfair and oppressive taxation has been the cause of most revolutions in the world.King George III's revenge on the upstart colonists?
Indeed...and with the world in it's present condition?
It won't be long...
See a pattern emerging here? History repeating?
I am for single payor nationalized health care.
Todays decision kinda lays the groundwork for that.
The ACA as it came from the lobbyists is crappy, but maybe we will get better in the future.
Which pattern? 1848? 1893? or 1929?Unfair and oppressive taxation has been the cause of most revolutions in the world.
Indeed...and with the world in it's present condition?
It won't be long...
See a pattern emerging here? History repeating?
The lie outed from the right side about this bill is that it ois some unconstitutional monster.
that lie is now dead.
Now your party will be seen as the liars you are
The lie outed from the right side about this bill is that it ois some unconstitutional monster.
that lie is now dead.
Now your party will be seen as the liars you are
If Obama had been honest, there is NO way Obamacare would have passed.
But of course, if Obama had been honest, he wouldn't have gotten the nomination in 2008.
Dishonesty has been a phenomenally successful strategy for him and the SCOTUS just put a big stamp of approval on it.
Still, I know the debate over this law has been divisive. I respect the very real concerns that millions of Americans have shared. And I know a lot of coverage through this health care debate has focused on what it means politically.
Well, it should be pretty clear by now that I didn't do this because it was good politics. I did it because I believed it was good for the country. I did it because I believed it was good for the American people.
....
With today's announcement, it's time for us to move forward - to implement and, where necessary, improve on this law. And now is the time to keep our focus on the most urgent challenge of our time: putting people back to work, paying down our debt and building an economy where people can have confidence that if they work hard, they can get ahead.
It is understandable that some of you don't like that I am a slimy opportunistic narcissist. It is good for the country that I lie to you over and over when you are being intransigent or not sufficiently convinced of my superiority.
And now that I have won, I order you people to put your principles back onto the shelf and buy into the fiction that I now care about what I should have spent the first two years of my term paying attention to. I'm still as incompetent on that front as I ever was, but I won, so STFU.
" paying down our debt "
Did he really say that?
Doesn't matter how many lies Obama told to get to today's results. All that matters is that Obamacare was upheld.
And as a bonus, Obamacare will bring so many headaches with it that when the implementation is finally over politicians will have all the ammo they need to scrap it and move to nationalized healthcare.
Win-win, huh?