The Enemy Within

[SAYIT]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

 

[RKMBrown]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

Obama's friends from his college days where domestic terrorists conspiring to overthrow our government. See weather underground, see the author of Rules for Radicals, see Obama's ex-preacher...

I'd say its very plausible that history will some day repeat itself and we'll get another Obama as president.

 

[Disir]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

You mean the ones that scapegoat?

 

[SAYIT]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

You mean the ones that scapegoat?

It's a good idea to recognize the enemy within whether it be loony left or, in the case of Tim McVey, loony right. Don't you agree?

 

[Disir]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

You mean the ones that scapegoat?

It's a good idea to recognize the enemy within whether it be loony left or, in the case of Tim McVey, loony right. Don't you agree?

Americans who not only disagree with the view of America

See the above?

It's arbitrary.

US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities

See the above?

It's arbitrary. It is also highly political.

It's also very convenient for those that are doing what they can to destroy higher ed. It's also sickening the lengths people will go to in an effort to do so. For instance: using 9-11.

 

[rightwinger]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

Ron Paul claimed the same thing

 

[SAYIT]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

You mean the ones that scapegoat?

It's a good idea to recognize the enemy within whether it be loony left or, in the case of Tim McVey, loony right. Don't you agree?

Americans who not only disagree with the view of America

See the above?

It's arbitrary.

US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities

See the above?

It's arbitrary. It is also highly political.

It's also very convenient for those that are doing what they can to destroy higher ed. It's also sickening the lengths people will go to in an effort to do so. For instance: using 9-11.

Are you saying that peeps like Ward Churchill are trying to destroy education in this country (or trying to destroy this country) or that those who post about the seditious acts of some teachers are doing so?

 

[SAYIT]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

Ron Paul claimed the same thing

Proving only that even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
Was that your point or are you defending those who teach and preach hate for America in our schools?

 

[rightwinger]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

Ron Paul claimed the same thing

Proving only that even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
Was that your point or are you defending those who teach and preach hate for America in our schools?

I have never heard of Ward Churchill......I HAVE heard of Ron Paul

Why isn't your thread about him?

 

[Disir]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

You mean the ones that scapegoat?

It's a good idea to recognize the enemy within whether it be loony left or, in the case of Tim McVey, loony right. Don't you agree?

Americans who not only disagree with the view of America

See the above?

It's arbitrary.

US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities

See the above?

It's arbitrary. It is also highly political.

It's also very convenient for those that are doing what they can to destroy higher ed. It's also sickening the lengths people will go to in an effort to do so. For instance: using 9-11.

Are you saying that peeps like Ward Churchill are trying to destroy education in this country (or trying to destroy this country) or that those who post about the seditious acts of some teachers are doing so?

I'm saying that those who make broad sweeping generalizations are doing so.

 

[Ava]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

Yes, there are many Ward Churchill's/BillAyers being groomed in our country. Friday night on Fox, 9 Eastern, Megyn Kelly has Ward Churchill and Dinesh D`Souza in debate. Should be informative, to say the least.

 

[Mac1958]

Friday night on Fox, 9 Eastern, Megyn Kelly has Ward Churchill and Dinesh D`Souza in debate. Should be informative, to say the least.

Holy crap.

Yeah, that should be interesting.

.

 

[g5000]

Yes, there are many Ward Churchill's/BillAyers being groomed in our country. Friday night on Fox, 9 Eastern, Megyn Kelly has Ward Churchill and Dinesh D`Souza in debate. Should be informative, to say the least.

You must have a different definition of "informative" than I have. Yours must include the phrase "freak show" in it.

 

[Desperado]

Obama's friends from his college days where domestic terrorists conspiring to overthrow our government. See weather underground, see the author of Rules for Radicals, see Obama's ex-preacher...

I'd say its very plausible that history will some day repeat itself and we'll get another Obama as president.

Why not? History is already repeating itself since we seem to have another Iraqi War. Though we have not been informed of its cool name like "Operation Desert Storm" or "Operation Enduring Freedom". Maybe to keep Obama interested it should be "Operation Back 9". Meanwhile, We just sit and wait for the sequel to "Shock and Awe", that should raise CNN's ratings.

 

[g5000]

I find the OP's "Us vs. Them" mentality to be ironic.

For some reason, it is extremely important to Fox News and other hack media outlets that this country be divided.

We cannot get to where we are supposed to be unless we all get there together.

 

[SAYIT]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

You mean the ones that scapegoat?

It's a good idea to recognize the enemy within whether it be loony left or, in the case of Tim McVey, loony right. Don't you agree?

Americans who not only disagree with the view of America

See the above?

It's arbitrary.

US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities

See the above?

It's arbitrary. It is also highly political.

It's also very convenient for those that are doing what they can to destroy higher ed. It's also sickening the lengths people will go to in an effort to do so. For instance: using 9-11.

Are you saying that peeps like Ward Churchill are trying to destroy education in this country (or trying to destroy this country) or that those who post about the seditious acts of some teachers are doing so?

I'm saying that those who make broad sweeping generalizations are doing so.

There was nothing "broad" nor "sweeping" about my comments. They were directed specifically at the "small but influential cabal" of America haters who have access to the minds of our kids.

 

[g5000]

Natives vs. immigrants. Moneyed vs. poor. Left vs. Right. "Right" vs. "Wrong". Whites vs. "multiculturalism" (cultural marxism).

Separation is the general theme on these alleged "news" channels and in most of the topics on these political forums. The demonic hacks on TV stoke the fires of hatred with gusto, all for ad dollars.

 

[Disir]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

You mean the ones that scapegoat?

It's a good idea to recognize the enemy within whether it be loony left or, in the case of Tim McVey, loony right. Don't you agree?

Americans who not only disagree with the view of America

See the above?

It's arbitrary.

US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities

See the above?

It's arbitrary. It is also highly political.

It's also very convenient for those that are doing what they can to destroy higher ed. It's also sickening the lengths people will go to in an effort to do so. For instance: using 9-11.

Are you saying that peeps like Ward Churchill are trying to destroy education in this country (or trying to destroy this country) or that those who post about the seditious acts of some teachers are doing so?

I'm saying that those who make broad sweeping generalizations are doing so.

There was nothing "broad" nor "sweeping" about my comments. They were directed specifically at the "small but influential cabal" of America haters who have access to the minds of our kids.

America haters

See that?
Arbitrary. Conveniently so.

 

[g5000]

The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

Or maybe it will be some gun toting twisted extreme right wing fucks who can't wait for RaHoWa.

There are plenty of drooling right wing tards on this forum looking forward to a second Civil War.

 

[SAYIT]

On this, the 13th anniversary of 9/11, it seems appropriate to discuss those Americans who not only disagree with the view of America and Americans as a force for good but actively promote their disdain to include violent opposition to our national interests.
I speak of that influential group which fills the heads of impressionable college kids with their twisted POV. Shortly after 9/11, then Professor Ward Churchill found use for it as a "teaching" lesson, claiming we deserved to be attacked and that those killed were "little Eichmans" (Nazis). Today, Churchill still stands by his comments and the small but influential cabal to which he belongs still inculcate our kids with their particular brand of hate. The next round of terror attacks on America will be perpetrated not by al Qaeda or ISIS or whatever rabid Islamist terror gang is popular but rather by US anarchists/socialists who are currently being groomed for the job in our universities.

Ron Paul claimed the same thing

Proving only that even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
Was that your point or are you defending those who teach and preach hate for America in our schools?

I have never heard of Ward Churchill......I HAVE heard of Ron Paul

Why isn't your thread about him?

This thread isn't about Ward Churchill and if you weren't so busy being defensive you would recognize that I speak of the "small but influential cabal" of those who teach and preach hate for America (including, perhaps, Ron Paul).