Johnlaw“PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona county election officials have identified fewer than 200 cases of potential voter fraud out of more than 3 million ballots cast in last year’s presidential election, undercutting former President Donald Trump’s claims of a stolen election as his allies continue a disputed ballot review in the state’s most populous county.
An Associated Press investigation found 182 cases where problems were clear enough that officials referred them to investigators for further review. So far, only four cases have led to charges, including those identified in a separate state investigation. No one has been convicted. No person’s vote was counted twice.
While it’s possible more cases could emerge, the numbers illustrate the implausibility of Trump’s claims that fraud and irregularities in Arizona cost him the state’s electorate votes. In final, certified and audited results, Biden won 10,400 more votes than Trump out of 3.4 million cast.…
Arizona’s potential cases also illustrate another reality: Voter fraud is often bipartisan. Of the four Arizona cases that have resulted in criminal charges, two involved Democratic voters and two involved Republicans.
AP’s review supports statements made by many state and local elections officials — and even some Republican county officials and GOP Gov. Doug Ducey — that Arizona’s presidential election was secure and its results valid.”
AP: Few AZ voter fraud cases, discrediting Trump's claims
An Associated Press investigation has found county election officials throughout Arizona have identified fewer than 200 cases of potential voter fraud from last year's presidential election that require review by local prosecutors.apnews.com
Only insane Trumpists believe this widespread voter fraud hoax. Trump and his minions are just running another scam for the benefit of his lemmings. The more they get the lemmings upset, the more money they send to Mar-a-lago.
What is ironic is that out of the 4 cases where charges were brought, 2 were Republican. You really can’t make this up.
How many of the millions of mail in ballots were NOTARIZED under penalty of perjury?
This contested issue has never been addressed.
But that is what is causing the election process and results to be FAITH BASED.
there is NO PROOF that all those mail in ballots were valid to begin with.
Plus the RULES to allow UNNOTARIZED mailin ballots by the MILLIONS
were changed WITHOUT voting through State Legislatures that the people elect
including by party representation so that input into policy is more even distributed.
Why is it that the majority supporting UNNOTARIZED mailin ballots are liberal/Democrat/Biden supporters
who approved those rules and changes,
while the majority arguing for State Legislatures voting according to Federal Election laws
and who believe in the standard of Notarization under Penalty of Perjury
are EXCLUDED from the decisions about voting rules and process?
If people do NOT agree on the rules for voting and election
and the country/votes/states are split in half,
why would only HALF the nation and voters
be allowed to dictate the rules for the other half?
That is why the election is still contested and not accepted.
It is faith based, depending if you believe in unnotarized ballots or not
or you believe in changing rules by people in arbitrary positions in govt
instead of elected State Legislators voting on behalf of ALL their citizens,
not just representing one side's beliefs.
The people, half the nation and voters, were NOT represented in the process or rule changes.
For Conservatives to be included, NOTARIZATION of ballots would have to be
either included or voted on. But where these changes were made WITHOUT VOTING,
the people never had a chance to have a say in the process.
So this election only represents the BELIEFS of half the voters,
is FAITH BASED, and BELIEFS cannot be established by govt
without Consent of the people.
If people do not consent because they have seen no proof
of valid NOTARIZED ballots, they cannot be forced to believe in something
FAITH BASED.
The people have the right to CONSENT to terms if they are going to be
required to take voting or elections on faith. And those terms involve
NOTARIZATION and proof of legal valid voters to satisfy and represent
the Conservatives, Libertarians and others contesting the election.
The "fraud" is in MISREPRESENTING to the public that this was "Constitutional."
Establishing FAITH BASED policy without consent of the people is Unconstitutional.
So until and unless the supporters of the election process and results
acknowledge it is Unconstitutional to change the rules without voting or consent
of the states and people affected, and to count "unnotarized mail in ballots
in the millions" WITHOUT consent and Constitutional rule changes as required
by half the voting population contesting the process used,
then that is causing MISREPRESENTATION and DEFRAUDING the public.
You are so much bullshit. Most states do not require mail-in ballots to be notarized. Only 7 states require some form of notarization. That is pretty uniform. The act of voting someone else's mail in ballot is already a crime. There is no proof that mail in ballots are not valid. Several states are already mail in and there is no evidence of fraud. Laws regarding the expansion of mail in ballots were either passed by Republican legislators or voter initiative.
