The FBI, the Clintons and the "public interest".

Ray9

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2016
2,707
4,476
1,970
The FBI has denied access to files on Hillary Clinton’s email scandal and her astonishing violations of national security on the grounds that the public is not interested in it. This is an odd state of affairs since the stated mission of the FBI is to uphold the US Constitution and protect the people from domestic threats to our survival as a free republic.


Since we don’t have royalty in this country and the purpose of the FBI is not to mirror the behavior of the Soviet KGB or the secret police in other countries, most believe the purpose of the FBI is to ensure that no one is above the law. The secret police in other parts of the world function to protect the status quo which is what the FBI appears to be doing in the Clinton case.


So apparently an agency whose mission is to investigate domestic threats has decided not to release its files on Hillary Clinton’s treasonous, self-serving, cavalier misuse of cyber technology and the conscious, willful cover-up and destruction of evidence by her and her lawyers because they have decided it doesn’t serve the public interest.


The bizarre behavior of FBI director James Comey during the last presidential election has some people beginning to wonder if it’s time to close the books on the FBI and supplant it with a new agency less infiltrated and contaminated with politics.


The people have all the respect in the world for the rank and file of the FBI who readily put themselves in harm’s way often under a hail of bullets but the FBI’s leadership appears to have been corrupted by powerful people in high places and its credibility has come under a dangerous cloud.


The nefarious history of both the Clintons and their odious quid-pro-quo foundation make Bernie Madoff look like a Boy Scout. The damage done to US national security is immeasurable but the FBI has swung into action to protect the culprits from the public not the other way around.


It should not be the purview of the FBI to decide that some people are just too popular and too powerful to be investigated and prosecuted. Hillary Clinton’s excuse that it shouldn’t count because it’s me is unacceptable. The term “untouchables” appears to apply to the Clintons and their treasure.


The FBI should do its job or we should replace it.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
?????? Doesn't appear to be written in a foreign language.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
I had someone critique the piece and have tweaked it based on their advice:




The FBI has denied access to files on Hillary Clinton’s email scandal and her astonishing violations of national security on the grounds that her privacy is not outweighed by the public interest. This is an odd state of affairs since the stated mission of the FBI is to uphold the US Constitution and protect the people from domestic threats to our survival as a free republic.


Since we don’t have royalty in this country and the purpose of the FBI is not to mirror the behavior of the Soviet KGB or the secret police in other countries, most believe the purpose of the FBI is to ensure that no one is above the law. The secret police in other parts of the world function to protect the status quo which is what the FBI appears to be doing in the Clinton case.


Apparently an agency whose mission is to investigate domestic threats has decided not to release its files on Hillary Clinton’s treasonous, self-serving, cavalier misuse of cyber technology and the conscious, willful cover-up and destruction of evidence by her and her lawyers because they have decided it doesn’t serve the public interest.


The bizarre behavior of FBI director James Comey during the last presidential election and his admitted purposeful leaking against the current president seem to be at odds with the FBI’s sudden concern with the personal privacy of a former Secretary of State who was caught red-handed violating national security protocol, lied about it and then destroyed evidence to cover up her bad acts.


The next time an average citizen is under investigation by the FBI they may want to emulate Clinton’s behavior and see how that works out. That citizen would never get the chance. The FBI would launch a surprise raid on their home and seize their computer files before they even knew what hit them.


The people have all the respect in the world for the rank and file of the FBI who readily put themselves in harm’s way often under a hail of bullets. Fidelity, bravery and integrity are alive and well among working agents.


But the Bureau’s leadership has lost its way and has allowed itself to be infiltrated and contaminated by politics. This does not bode well for the future security of our republic especially when the term “untouchables” refers not to the Bureau but to the Clintons and their treasure.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
This is a real issue. No one on this site can recognize it?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
The problem with not holding high profile figures accountable for their crimes is that rest of society sees that they are not held accountable. The response is a widespread general attitude of contempt for laws that only apply to common citizens. It's a highly contagious phenomenon that produces lawlessness for the rest of us.
 
The problem with not holding high profile figures accountable for their crimes is that rest of society sees that they are not held accountable. The response is a widespread general attitude of contempt for laws that only apply to common citizens. It's a highly contagious phenomenon that produces lawlessness for the rest of us.
What crime? OOPS!
 
This is a real issue. No one on this site can recognize it?

Because most are to busy acting like ANTIFA morons.
Most are to dumbed down to connect the dots where Clintons are concerned, I mean my gawd these asses were going to vote for Hillary that should tell you their mentality of stupidity.

No matter what proof you put in front of a.h. their Heroes can do no wrong.
 
People need to separate their emotions from their perceptions. Hillary Clinton lost the election to a complete political novice because she couldn't personally connect to many average citizens. She violated security protocol and mishandled classified information not because she made a mistake but because she thumbed her nose at laws she didn't think should apply to her. She shares no kinship with common people and considers herself above rules that regulate even her peers in her own party. Hillary Clinton willfully and with malice aforethought committed crimes against her country for her own purposes. Emotions notwithstanding there is no escape from that reality.
 
Retired FBI Supervisory Special Agent Sues Justice Department for Records About Top FBI Official Ties to Top Clinton Ally - Judicial Watch


Sues for Records on Links Between FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced that it today filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit on behalf of Jeffrey A. Danik, a retired FBI supervisory special agent, against the U.S. Department of Justice for records concerning FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe (Jeffrey A. Danik v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:17-cv-01792)). Danik worked for the Federal Bureau of Investigation for almost 30 years.

The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia in support of Danik’s October 25, 2016, and February 28, 2017, FOIA requests for records about McCabe’s “conflicts of interest” regarding his wife’s (Dr. Jill McCabe’s) political campaign, and McCabe’s reporting to the FBI of any job interviews or offers. Specifically, the two FOIA requests seek

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

upload_2017-9-1_10-46-19.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top