ReinyDays
Gold Member
Do you think that you know this material better than the sources to which I linked?
I know this material better than you ... and am better qualified to access the quality of your Google AI results ... most of it sucks and the results are based on your personal search habits for the past 12 months ... stupid ... you just puke forth this horseshit like it tastes good or something ...
You offer as fact what is conjecture ... that's profoundly ignorant ... ding doesn't offer as fact what he knows is conjecture, that's generally considered wisjgw ... umm ... wictabr ... er ... well, one hell of a lot smarter than you, though I don't think he'd appreciate the comparison ...
My conjecture is that convection is more efficient at higher temperatures ... and this causes more average cloudiness ... which lowers temperatures ... which reduces clouds allowing more solar energy to reach the surface, raising temperatures, more clouds, etc etc etc ... oscillating back and forth ... no, I have no proof, but I know this is an active area of research ... the reason for the interest is this also explains Arctic amplification ...
Everybody has assholes ... everybody has opinions ... everybody has their pet theory ... if you took calculus in college, then you know the OP is complete bullshit ... Kepler's Laws are a great example for the student, every textbook has sections on them ...
Obliquity doesn't change irradiation ... doesn't change surface temperature ... doesn't change climate ... butch ...