- Mar 23, 2008
- 25,185
- 6,272
- Thread starter
- #61
That's because the subject was not God, but the individual who used God, advancing a Fraudulent 'interpretation' of God as a deceitful means to influence the ignorant.
Much as you are using fraudulent interpretations as a deceitful means to influence the ignorant.
Fraudulent?
That's a tall accusation, Brother.
It's not an accusation, Brother. It's a fact. Learn the difference. It should help to move the conversation along.
I ass-u-me you can link to post(s) of mine that document AVG-FRAUD?
Why would I bother? Your thread's been moved to the trash.
As I said, the debate is over and you lost. Brother.
Whatever helps you sleep at night, Bro'.