The History of The GOP Since 1980....In One Paragraph.....

[Toddsterpatriot]

Doesn't matter.

How disappointing. You sounded so knowledgeable.

 

[The5thHorseman]

How disappointing. You sounded so knowledgeable.

Did you know that the past 3 GOP administrations collectively generated net NEGATIVE private sector jobs since 1989?

You do now.

Do you think there is anything you know about "policies" which excuses this?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Did you know that the past 3 GOP administrations collectively generated net NEGATIVE private sector jobs since 1989?

You do now.

Do you think there is anything you know about "policies" which excuses this?

So, no details on Biden's spending cuts?

 

[The5thHorseman]

So, no details on Biden's spending cuts?

Start a thread.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Start a thread.

a) that spending and the deficit have FALLEN under Biden

Which areas have seen reduced spending? Be specific.

 

[The5thHorseman]

a) that spending and the deficit have FALLEN under Biden

Which areas have seen reduced spending? Be specific.

Where do you see anything about "areas" in my statement?

My statement is objectively true.

Isn't it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Where do you see anything about "areas" in my statement?

My statement is objectively true.

Isn't it?

Where do you see anything about "areas" in my statement?

Exactly.

 

[Couchpotato]

Growing weary of the wait.....

All Employees, Total Private

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Release: Employment Situation



Units: Thousands of Persons, Seasonally Adjusted


Frequency: Monthly


The series comes from the 'Current Employment Statistics (Establishment Survey).'



2/89 - 89,615


2/93 - 91,142

2/01 - 111,879

2/09 - 110,735

2/17 - 123,519

2/21 - 121, 751

6/23 - 133,494



Bush I - 1,527

Clinton - 20,737

Bush II - (1,144)

Obama - 22,784


Trump - (1,768)

Biden - 11,743


Since 1989, Private Industries have added a total of 43,879,000 jobs.

Of that total, 3 GOP administrations have contributed (1,385) million.

Couchpotato

Over to you.

Ok. Which policies do you think made that happen?

 

[The5thHorseman]

Where do you see anything about "areas" in my statement?

Exactly.

So why are you laboring them?

Did you miss this?

My statement is objectively true.

Isn't it?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

a) that spending and the deficit have FALLEN under Biden

Which areas have seen reduced spending? Be specific.

It's classic word salad

 

[The5thHorseman]

Ok. Which policies do you think made that happen?

Do you acknowledge the Objective Facts?

 

[The5thHorseman]

It's classic word salad

that spending and the deficit have FALLEN under Biden


Where are you reading ambiguity?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So why are you laboring them?

Did you miss this?

My statement is objectively true.

Isn't it?

You can't give any details?
Or you're afraid to give them?

 

[Couchpotato]

Do you acknowledge the Objective Facts?

Did I contest your little post? Waiting on that policy you’re ascribing to it.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Did I contest your little post? Waiting on that policy you’re ascribing to it.

Don't "stipulate" with a question or qualified answer.

 

[Couchpotato]

Don't "stipulate" with a question or qualified answer.

Policy. Name it

 

[The5thHorseman]

Policy. Name it

Pointless unless you can stipulate to what is objectively true.

 

[Couchpotato]

Pointless unless you can stipulate to what is objectively true.

Fuck off man. Dont ever come on here and say you want to discuss policy and no one will.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Fuck off man. Dont ever come on here and say you want to discuss policy and no one will.

Any random imbecile is "willing"....the trick is to know enough facts to ba "able".

 

[Couchpotato]

Any random imbecile is "willing"....the trick is to know enough facts to ba "able".

Ok.