The Homeless people of California

...According to lying thieving GOP propaganda and fools like you LOL..
You tell 'em, my little Progressive twit.

...Yes they take care of their homeless and let them Sleep In tents and vans and RVs. Big f****** deal super duper.
More time focused on real Americans.... less time on fruitcakes and beaners and other algae.
 
so how is this fixed?

~S~


Drive the Communists from power. Strip the Oligarchs of their rule.
The greedy idiot GOP has been in power for 35 years dumbass. Calling people communists is a joke, like you.


You're too stupid to deal with fucktard.

California has had the democrats in charge of both state legislative branches and the courts for over 30 years, you drooling retard.
And the GOP has been wrecking the the country for 35 years, dimwit.​


DERP

Dumbfuck.
 
...According to lying thieving GOP propaganda and fools like you LOL..
You tell 'em, my little Progressive twit.

...Yes they take care of their homeless and let them Sleep In tents and vans and RVs. Big f****** deal super duper.
More time focused on real Americans.... less time on fruitcakes and beaners and other algae.
Most are citizens, super duper. But always good to get the racist a******dupe Outlook.
 
Run by Democrats for over 30 years..........

More people leaving than any other state.

And one of highest areas of illegals going there.

Historic Change of demographics.

And Ranked number one in homelessness and Welfare................

Of course they sent the Derp to try and wiggle out of the facts in that State.
 
so how is this fixed?

~S~


Drive the Communists from power. Strip the Oligarchs of their rule.
The greedy idiot GOP has been in power for 35 years dumbass. Calling people communists is a joke, like you.


You're too stupid to deal with fucktard.

California has had the democrats in charge of both state legislative branches and the courts for over 30 years, you drooling retard.
And the GOP has been wrecking the the country for 35 years, dimwit.​


DERP

Dumbfuck.
See if you can spot the trend, brainwashed functional moron..

Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = The Fed - Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 - Current Release
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts
 
Run by Democrats for over 30 years..........

More people leaving than any other state.

And one of highest areas of illegals going there.

Historic Change of demographics.

And Ranked number one in homelessness and Welfare................

Of course they sent the Derp to try and wiggle out of the facts in that State.
Thanks for allowing all the illegals in, Wrecking the middle class, the stupidest Wars ever and the corrupt World depression, super dupers.

Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = The Fed - Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 - Current Release
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts


← Next postPrevious post →

Subscribe / Share


Article by elfish
2b65939b0aee13bbf766da6d20c28f46
Authors bio is coming up shortly.Read 17 articles by elfishIt's very calm over here, why not leave a comment?
Leave a Reply
Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website



Notify me of followup comments via e-mail




Subscribe

Meta
Categories
 
Democrat cities are pig styes.
And this is con country -



"Video by Alexandra Pelosi"

I'm sure she sought to present a balanced view. :auiqs.jpg:

Like your comment? LOL


My comment has all the evidence necessary, much of it found in your own press.

So does mine. Did you watch the video?


I did, and thought of John Boorman. My suburban POV, I assume.
 
Run by Democrats for over 30 years..........

More people leaving than any other state.

And one of highest areas of illegals going there.

Historic Change of demographics.

And Ranked number one in homelessness and Welfare................

Of course they sent the Derp to try and wiggle out of the facts in that State.
Thanks for allowing all the illegals in, Wrecking the middle class, the stupidest Wars ever and the corrupt World depression, super dupers.

Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = The Fed - Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 - Current Release
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts


← Next postPrevious post →

Subscribe / Share


Article by elfish
2b65939b0aee13bbf766da6d20c28f46
Authors bio is coming up shortly.Read 17 articles by elfishIt's very calm over here, why not leave a comment?
Leave a Reply
Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website



Notify me of followup comments via e-mail




Subscribe

Meta
Categories
fiow3cv7iyvz.jpg
 
They should put the homeless to work cleaning up their mess.

Oh wait. I fogot. The homeless don't want a job. Never mind.
 
so is this a thread pointing out who to blame for the homeless problem , or what the solution to it would be?

~S~
 
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
I know that I'm wasting my time, but just for fun: How do you think workers have become more and more productive? Technology, machinery, automation.

Who do you think took the financial risk to purchase the technology, machinery and automation? Who stood to fail if it didn't increase productivity? Who is operating in an increasingly more intense and competitive business environment, with essentially no choice but to take those risks if they want to survive and keep paying employees?

The real answers here, as usual, are somewhere in the middle. There is no doubt that wealth disparities are increasing, and that's not good. It has to be intelligently addressed before the shit hits the fan. But if you can't even bring yourself to be honest about the above, you're just another blind, screaming ideologue.

Simplistic, binary thinking is fucking killing us.
.
 
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
I know that I'm wasting my time, but just for fun: How do you think workers have become more and more productive? Technology, machinery, automation.

Who do you think took the financial risk to purchase the technology, machinery and automation? Who stood to fail if it didn't increase productivity? Who is operating in an increasingly more intense and competitive business environment, with essentially no choice but to take those risks if they want to survive and keep paying employees?

The real answers here, as usual, are somewhere in the middle. There is no doubt that wealth disparities are increasing, and that's not good. It has to be intelligently addressed before the shit hits the fan. But if you can't even bring yourself to be honest about the above, you're just another blind, screaming ideologue.

Simplistic, binary thinking is fucking killing us.
.
So are mega rich billionaires.
 
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
I know that I'm wasting my time, but just for fun: How do you think workers have become more and more productive? Technology, machinery, automation.

Who do you think took the financial risk to purchase the technology, machinery and automation? Who stood to fail if it didn't increase productivity? Who is operating in an increasingly more intense and competitive business environment, with essentially no choice but to take those risks if they want to survive and keep paying employees?

The real answers here, as usual, are somewhere in the middle. There is no doubt that wealth disparities are increasing, and that's not good. It has to be intelligently addressed before the shit hits the fan. But if you can't even bring yourself to be honest about the above, you're just another blind, screaming ideologue.

Simplistic, binary thinking is fucking killing us.
So are mega rich billionaires.
No they're not. They're just playing the hand we're choosing to give them.

We have to start thinking and stop screaming.
.
 

Forum List

Back
Top