The House Impeachment Report

Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
maxresdefault.jpg

Anyone defending the most corrupt, incompetent POTUS in history should be the first to face charges of treason.

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs

"Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said during a Fox News interview that he could not 'recall' speaking with Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, despite call records released in the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report showing numerous phone conversations between the two.

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."

You fucking Nazis are peeking into phone calls without a warrant! Nunes is allowed to talk to Rudy!

You guys look more like Stalin with each passing day and it won't end well for you
 
I heard Joe, who heard from Sammy, who heard from Bill, who heard from Fred, who heard Chris tell Nora, that Trump is a doo-doo head!

I think that just about sums up the entire House Intel Committee's evidence against Trump.

THAT hearsay!

Now balance that with Sondland saying Trump told him "No quid pro quo"..

Only the latter can be admitted into evidence because it is not hearsay.
Hearsay is very frequently admitted in court. There’s a lot of rules about it but suffice to say, it’s not an absolute cant be admitted.

Bullshit! Why do you act like you are some kind of legal expert when you say such stupid things? There are exceptions to hearsay evidence and exactly none of those apply in this case.

Thanks but nothing you said contradicted what I said.

You are so stupid you cannot even recognize when you have been soundly thrashed. Is it a reading comprehension issue because that is what it appears to be?
What the hell is your problem? Why are you so angry ?
Angry? LOL. dude, you're soo fking confused. I'm not surprised though.
 
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
maxresdefault.jpg

Anyone defending the most corrupt, incompetent POTUS in history should be the first to face charges of treason.

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs

"Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said during a Fox News interview that he could not 'recall' speaking with Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, despite call records released in the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report showing numerous phone conversations between the two.

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."
how do you know he talked to the guy? what court approved looking into his phone records? or finding out who he called? unless you have transcripts, you got nothing again son. I think it's now time to arrest Schitt's for abuse of power.
ow do you know he talked to the guy? what court approved looking into his phone records? or finding out who he called? unless you have transcripts, you got nothing again son. I think it's now time to arrest Schitt's for abuse of power.
WwQN0QHi.jpg

Mooo!
 
I heard Joe, who heard from Sammy, who heard from Bill, who heard from Fred, who heard Chris tell Nora, that Trump is a doo-doo head!

I think that just about sums up the entire House Intel Committee's evidence against Trump.

THAT hearsay!

Now balance that with Sondland saying Trump told him "No quid pro quo"..

Only the latter can be admitted into evidence because it is not hearsay.
Hearsay is very frequently admitted in court. There’s a lot of rules about it but suffice to say, it’s not an absolute cant be admitted.

Bullshit! Why do you act like you are some kind of legal expert when you say such stupid things? There are exceptions to hearsay evidence and exactly none of those apply in this case.

Thanks but nothing you said contradicted what I said.

You are so stupid you cannot even recognize when you have been soundly thrashed. Is it a reading comprehension issue because that is what it appears to be?
What the hell is your problem? Why are you so angry ?

Maybe he's like me and he just has a weakness for traitorous assholes after having put some actual skin in the game himself.
 
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
maxresdefault.jpg

Anyone defending the most corrupt, incompetent POTUS in history should be the first to face charges of treason.

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs

"Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said during a Fox News interview that he could not 'recall' speaking with Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, despite call records released in the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report showing numerous phone conversations between the two.

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."

You fucking Nazis are peeking into phone calls without a warrant! Nunes is allowed to talk to Rudy!

You guys look more like Stalin with each passing day and it won't end well for you
You fucking Nazis are peeking into phone calls without a warrant! Nunes is allowed to talk to Rudy!

You guys look more like Stalin with each passing day and it won't end well for you
Stalin would have owned Trump and most of Fifth Avenue, and you loons would still swallow every rich load twice. All call records have been obtained legally, and they will eventually reveal Donald for what he truly is
c3a547ccca9e5ec78d99878f2a6ee171_md.jpg

Donald Trump is 'Putin's Bitch' According to Vandalized Walk of Fame Star

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs
 
Justice Roberts is gonna have a field day with this one. These crooks are screwed.
Justice Roberts is gonna have a field day with this one. These crooks are screwed
I wonder how much input Roberts will have on a Senate impeachment trial?

Possible partisan battles in Senate over Trump impeachment trial previewed

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Tuesday raised the possibility of a spirited battle over how an impeachment trial for President Donald Trump would be run and suggested that the referee - Supreme Court Justice John Roberts - not meddle."

Moscow Mitch will be dealing with Trump's impeachment/removal in an election year. I wonder if that will affect which witnesses we will be allowed to hear from? Will Rudy and Don and Mick get an opportunity to provide some first-hand information on this matter?
At the hearings I've been part of, the Judge is a critical member of the proceeding. At least for one, the judge will shut down a lot of the repetitive badgering and grandstanding that we heard during the House impeachment hearings. "Asked and answered; move on" is a good one.
They also sustain or deny objections on points of law, allowing or omitting certain testimony, which can be critical. They can question witnesses if the attorneys fail to raise important points. Judges do a lot of things besides listen. And Chief Justice Roberts is not going to put up with a bunch of bullshit from either side if they try to tell him how to run the trial. I think he might have a little more experience with that than a bunch of Senators who think they know everything.


The first thing he will break of the House Managers heads are the hearsay evidence they will try to introduce. The Dems will be left without a case, which they never had to begin with!
What hearsay?

I heard Joe, who heard from Sammy, who heard from Bill, who heard from Fred, who heard Chris tell Nora, that Trump is a doo-doo head!

I think that just about sums up the entire House Intel Committee's evidence against Trump.

THAT hearsay!

Now balance that with Sondland saying Trump told him "No quid pro quo"..

Only the latter can be admitted into evidence because it is not hearsay.
Really? The rest of Sondland's testimony is inadmissable? Why would that be? Because you don't like what he said?
 
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
maxresdefault.jpg

Anyone defending the most corrupt, incompetent POTUS in history should be the first to face charges of treason.

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs

"Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said during a Fox News interview that he could not 'recall' speaking with Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, despite call records released in the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report showing numerous phone conversations between the two.

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."
how do you know he talked to the guy? what court approved looking into his phone records? or finding out who he called? unless you have transcripts, you got nothing again son. I think it's now time to arrest Schitt's for abuse of power.
ow do you know he talked to the guy? what court approved looking into his phone records? or finding out who he called? unless you have transcripts, you got nothing again son. I think it's now time to arrest Schitt's for abuse of power.
WwQN0QHi.jpg

Mooo!
Mooo who?
 
Last edited:
Actually you should learn a thing or two. Schitt has NO right to those records as Giuliani and Nunes are NOT being investigated. Thus he has ZERO legal reason to have them. And messing with Solomon will get Schitt in a hell of a lot more trouble than he can handle. Solomon will wipe the deck with him should this get to court. Schitt CAN and SHOULD be arrested for this. But continue to kiss his ass as you clowns get destroyed in 2020.

Giuliani is definitely part of this investigation. Nunes is just an idiot who got caught up in the mess but is going to be subject to an ethics investigation shortly. Solomon is in deep shit. He's been found to be pumping basically propaganda bought and paid for by corrupt Ukrainians. He's been canned from The Hill and is trying to salvage what scraps of credibility he has left.

Schiff isn't in any trouble. He's a Stanford graduate, Harvard law graduate, former federal prosecutor. Nunes is a hayseed. Solomon is a hack. Giuliani has dementia. He'll be fine, mostly because he knows the law and hasn't violated anything. A pen register is not protected by the 4th amendment.

Boy that right there is one of the biggest piles of shit I’ve ever seen. I would wipe Schitt all over a courtroom. He’s a know nothing retard who’s still looking for nudes of Trump. And by the way, you still don’t have the votes to get to the Senate and you have no impeachable offense. Try again.

I hope you get the chance to confront Schiff in a courtroom some day. Be sure to let me know.

Before that happens, perhaps you could start learning about basics of US law. You’ve got some catching up to do.

Perhaps you should get out of grade school before spouting off about things you obviously know nothing about. I’ll gladly rub your face in how badly I embarrass Schitt for brains in court. By the way moron, the corruption exposed here belongs to Obozo and Biden. Joined by Schitt for brains and Pisslosi. You’re so confident you have Trump that you won’t even take a vote. That speaks volumes about what you don’t have,

You have some bizarre fantasies.

No fantasy. Truth of you getting your ass kicked all over this thread. After Nadless and that disaster yesterday the drunk Pisslosi is going ahead anyway. Enjoy Trump’s landslide re-election and the beatdown the Dims will get next year.
 
Justice Roberts is gonna have a field day with this one. These crooks are screwed.
Justice Roberts is gonna have a field day with this one. These crooks are screwed
I wonder how much input Roberts will have on a Senate impeachment trial?

Possible partisan battles in Senate over Trump impeachment trial previewed

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Tuesday raised the possibility of a spirited battle over how an impeachment trial for President Donald Trump would be run and suggested that the referee - Supreme Court Justice John Roberts - not meddle."

Moscow Mitch will be dealing with Trump's impeachment/removal in an election year. I wonder if that will affect which witnesses we will be allowed to hear from? Will Rudy and Don and Mick get an opportunity to provide some first-hand information on this matter?
At the hearings I've been part of, the Judge is a critical member of the proceeding. At least for one, the judge will shut down a lot of the repetitive badgering and grandstanding that we heard during the House impeachment hearings. "Asked and answered; move on" is a good one.
They also sustain or deny objections on points of law, allowing or omitting certain testimony, which can be critical. They can question witnesses if the attorneys fail to raise important points. Judges do a lot of things besides listen. And Chief Justice Roberts is not going to put up with a bunch of bullshit from either side if they try to tell him how to run the trial. I think he might have a little more experience with that than a bunch of Senators who think they know everything.


The first thing he will break of the House Managers heads are the hearsay evidence they will try to introduce. The Dems will be left without a case, which they never had to begin with!
What hearsay?

There is nothing but hearsay. Only two people were on the call and BOTH said nothing improper happened. You Communists have offered NOTHING but slander, libel, innuendo and third hand accounts. PLUS this whole thing is based on a fabricated tale by Eric Ciaramella who is the CIA goon that worked with Alexandra Chalupa in getting Ukraine to interfere in the 2016 election.

Damned right Ciaramella will be called by the Senate.
 
What was that personal benefit?

Oh, the same personal benefit found in all of the evidence that the House Intel Committee apparently forgot is inadmissible or doesn't exist?
What was that personal benefit?

To get people, the voters, to believe this about Biden.....

Joe Biden's asshole just tightened up because he did that very thing and bragged about it.
According to witnesses Trump never wanted nor did he ask for or get a quid pro quo


The mere suggestion has you dopes hooked. Bigly.
Biden is on video admitting he pressured the Ukraine to back off from looking into Burisma

That is not what Biden did, dope.

It's that very narrative that it was done for corrupt purposes that is the benefit to Trump campaign. You dopes swallowed it whole at the first suggestion. Now Trump has an army of dishonest losers like yourself who continue to propogate this lie at every opportunity.

That's exactly what Biden did, he admitted on tape, and the former prosecutor backs up the story with his own words, DOPE.

No, dope.
He pressured the Ukrainians to sack their corrupt attorney general. There was no investigation into Burisma at the time.


Fucking liar.

He BLACKMAILED Ukraine into firing the prosecutor investigating his son who was acting as a MULE in a kickback scheme from Burisma that Quid Pro Joe was embezzling millions in US foreign aid through. Chris Heinz, step son of John Fucking Kerry was a mule collecting kickbacks for Lerch as well. democrats, the whole fucking lot of them are crooks. The entire embezzlement scheme was set up by Hillary.
 

How the FUCK did Lying Schitt get the PHONE RECORDS of the President's personal lawyer and a US Congressman?

Why the FUCK is this crook bastard Schitt not in CUSTODY? This is the MOST OUTRAGEOUS abuse of power and infringement of 4th Amendment rights I've ever seen. PLUS the CROOKED LITTLE FUCK has the phone records of journalist John Solomon? What happened to the 1st Amendment, you fucking traitor bastards?

THIS is the kind of shit you take up arms over. WE HAVE NO FUCKING LAW, Adam Schitt is a scumbag dictator constrained by no law or Constitution.

William Barr, ENFORCE THE FUCKING LAW, or by god we the people will. Arrest this SCHITT now.

Nice meltdown and dodge.

Nice treason, scumbag.

Still melting down I see.

What's Rudy doing? Who's he doing it for?

So, Adam the lying Schitt violated the 4th Amendment and abused power. You're good with that though, you ONLY care about power for your filthy and corrupt party.
 
BTW, didn’t Nancy say uncontested today? What? The shitt’s Show said you trump can’t have witnesses. Right? Hey Nancy, FK You
 
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
maxresdefault.jpg

Anyone defending the most corrupt, incompetent POTUS in history should be the first to face charges of treason.

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs

"Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said during a Fox News interview that he could not 'recall' speaking with Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, despite call records released in the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report showing numerous phone conversations between the two.

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."

You fucking Nazis are peeking into phone calls without a warrant! Nunes is allowed to talk to Rudy!

You guys look more like Stalin with each passing day and it won't end well for you
You fucking Nazis are peeking into phone calls without a warrant! Nunes is allowed to talk to Rudy!

You guys look more like Stalin with each passing day and it won't end well for you
Stalin would have owned Trump and most of Fifth Avenue, and you loons would still swallow every rich load twice. All call records have been obtained legally, and they will eventually reveal Donald for what he truly is
c3a547ccca9e5ec78d99878f2a6ee171_md.jpg

Donald Trump is 'Putin's Bitch' According to Vandalized Walk of Fame Star

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs
You're a delusional little fuck that's for sure. It must be the TDS
 
I wonder how much input Roberts will have on a Senate impeachment trial?

Possible partisan battles in Senate over Trump impeachment trial previewed

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Tuesday raised the possibility of a spirited battle over how an impeachment trial for President Donald Trump would be run and suggested that the referee - Supreme Court Justice John Roberts - not meddle."

Moscow Mitch will be dealing with Trump's impeachment/removal in an election year. I wonder if that will affect which witnesses we will be allowed to hear from? Will Rudy and Don and Mick get an opportunity to provide some first-hand information on this matter?
At the hearings I've been part of, the Judge is a critical member of the proceeding. At least for one, the judge will shut down a lot of the repetitive badgering and grandstanding that we heard during the House impeachment hearings. "Asked and answered; move on" is a good one.
They also sustain or deny objections on points of law, allowing or omitting certain testimony, which can be critical. They can question witnesses if the attorneys fail to raise important points. Judges do a lot of things besides listen. And Chief Justice Roberts is not going to put up with a bunch of bullshit from either side if they try to tell him how to run the trial. I think he might have a little more experience with that than a bunch of Senators who think they know everything.


The first thing he will break of the House Managers heads are the hearsay evidence they will try to introduce. The Dems will be left without a case, which they never had to begin with!
What hearsay?

I heard Joe, who heard from Sammy, who heard from Bill, who heard from Fred, who heard Chris tell Nora, that Trump is a doo-doo head!

I think that just about sums up the entire House Intel Committee's evidence against Trump.

THAT hearsay!

Now balance that with Sondland saying Trump told him "No quid pro quo"..

Only the latter can be admitted into evidence because it is not hearsay.
Really? The rest of Sondland's testimony is inadmissable? Why would that be? Because you don't like what he said?
He was caught in a lie under oath doesn't that bother you?
 
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
maxresdefault.jpg

Anyone defending the most corrupt, incompetent POTUS in history should be the first to face charges of treason.

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs

"Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said during a Fox News interview that he could not 'recall' speaking with Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, despite call records released in the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report showing numerous phone conversations between the two.

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."

You fucking Nazis are peeking into phone calls without a warrant! Nunes is allowed to talk to Rudy!

You guys look more like Stalin with each passing day and it won't end well for you
You fucking Nazis are peeking into phone calls without a warrant! Nunes is allowed to talk to Rudy!

You guys look more like Stalin with each passing day and it won't end well for you
Stalin would have owned Trump and most of Fifth Avenue, and you loons would still swallow every rich load twice. All call records have been obtained legally, and they will eventually reveal Donald for what he truly is
c3a547ccca9e5ec78d99878f2a6ee171_md.jpg

Donald Trump is 'Putin's Bitch' According to Vandalized Walk of Fame Star

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs
You're a delusional little fuck that's for sure. It must be the TDS
You're a delusional little fuck that's for sure. It must be the TDS
Speaking of delusions...are you an "American Exceptionalist" or an "American Exemptionalist"?

American exceptionalism - Wikipedia

"During the George W. Bush administration (2001–2009), the term was somewhat abstracted from its historical context.[72]

"Proponents and opponents alike began using it to describe a phenomenon wherein certain political interests view the United States as being 'above' or an 'exception' to the law, specifically the Law of Nations.[73] (This phenomenon is less concerned with justifying American uniqueness than with asserting its immunity to international law.)"
 
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
Schiff is a fucking traitor, he's worse that the the British during Colonial times
maxresdefault.jpg

Anyone defending the most corrupt, incompetent POTUS in history should be the first to face charges of treason.

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs

"Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said during a Fox News interview that he could not 'recall' speaking with Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, despite call records released in the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report showing numerous phone conversations between the two.

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."
how do you know he talked to the guy? what court approved looking into his phone records? or finding out who he called? unless you have transcripts, you got nothing again son. I think it's now time to arrest Schitt's for abuse of power.
ow do you know he talked to the guy? what court approved looking into his phone records? or finding out who he called? unless you have transcripts, you got nothing again son. I think it's now time to arrest Schitt's for abuse of power.
WwQN0QHi.jpg

Mooo!
Mooo who?
Mooo who?
191119-Swan-Parnas-Nunes-Trip-Vienna-Hunt-Biden-Dirt-tease_nncscz

"Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said during a Fox News interview that he could not 'recall' speaking with Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, despite call records released in the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment report showing numerous phone conversations between the two.

"Call logs that apparently obtained from AT&T and included in the endnotes of the report show at least four calls between Parnas and Nunes on April 12, amid the smear campaign against then-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

"Parnas also called The Hill columnist John Solomon, who pushed the false narrative against Yovanovitch at the outlet.

"The logs also show that Nunes spoke multiple times with Giuliani ahead of those calls.

"Parnas, who was a key player in Giuliani’s search for damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, was later indicted on campaign finance charges."

Nunes can’t “recall” talking to Lev Parnas despite multiple call logs
 

How the FUCK did Lying Schitt get the PHONE RECORDS of the President's personal lawyer and a US Congressman?

Why the FUCK is this crook bastard Schitt not in CUSTODY? This is the MOST OUTRAGEOUS abuse of power and infringement of 4th Amendment rights I've ever seen. PLUS the CROOKED LITTLE FUCK has the phone records of journalist John Solomon? What happened to the 1st Amendment, you fucking traitor bastards?

THIS is the kind of shit you take up arms over. WE HAVE NO FUCKING LAW, Adam Schitt is a scumbag dictator constrained by no law or Constitution.

William Barr, ENFORCE THE FUCKING LAW, or by god we the people will. Arrest this SCHITT now.

Nice meltdown and dodge.

Nice treason, scumbag.

Still melting down I see.

What's Rudy doing? Who's he doing it for?
why do you care what Rudy's doing? he can talk to whoever he wants to. or are you saying he isn't allowed?

Rudy, as his attorney, works at the behest of the president, dope.

What work is he doing in Ukraine and why was Trump directing people to "talk to Rudy" when seeking direction on Ukraine?
 

Forum List

Back
Top