The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal

[daws101]

Many......Yet that does not mean that many of them have a clue about bringing down a building, nor does that mean that many of them equals many when you talk about the number of real experts that are out there who do not agree with them......Or at least refuse to sign onto their dumb ass site.......

name your top three outside of NIST...

Below is the list of people who have staked their reputations on the only paper which passed the scrutiny of peer review regarding the WTC tragedy...

For those who may think that no one has written a peer reviewed paper on the collapse of the towers here it is...

"Walter P. Murphy Professor of

Civil Engineering and Materials Science

Northwestern University

The towers of the World Trade Center were designed to withstand as a whole the horizontal impact of a large commercial aircraft. So why did a total collapse occur? The reason is the dynamic consequence of the prolonged heating of the steel columns to very high temperature. The heating caused creep buckling of the columns of the framed tube along the perimeter of the structure, which transmits the vertical load to the ground. The likely scenario of failure may be explained as follows...

http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf

The version linked above, to appear in the Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE), was revised and extended (with Yong Zhou on September 22 and additional appendices on September 28) since the original text of September 13, which was immediately posted at various civil engineering web sites, e.g. University of Illinios. It also has been or soon will be published in a number of other journals, including Archives of Applied Mechanics, Studi i Ricerche, and SIAM News:

Z. P. Bazant and Y. Zhou, "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse?", Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics News, vol. 34, No. 8 (October, 2001).

That means it's not just a document, book, web site or calculation on a forum. It's had to pass critical review by other engineering Professors.

I know there are CT sites which attack this paper but not one person has yet to disprove its hypothesis professionally. There are still people attacking the theory of evolution. Anyone can attack, not many can produce a paper to back it up. Just as there is no "theory of intelligent design" except on Christian web sites, there are no alternatives to this paper other than in CT sites and books."

Why did the World Trade Center towers collapse?

The paper... http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf

http://www.pubs.asce.org/journals/edem.html

Editor:

Ross B. Corotis, Ph.D., P.E., S.E., NAE, University of Colorado, Boulder
[email protected]

http://ceae.colorado.edu/new/faculty/people/people.cgi?corotis

Editorial Board:

Younane Abousleiman, Ph.D., University of Oklahoma MPGE | The University of Oklahoma ||

Ching S. Chang, Ph.D., P.E., University of Massachusetts http://www.ecs.umass.edu/cee/faculty/chang.html

Joel P. Conte, Ph.D., P.E., University of California, San Diego
http://kudu.ucsd.edu/

Henri Gavin, Duke University
Henri P. Gavin | Duke Civil and Environmental Engineering

Bojan B. Guzina, University of Minnesota
People: Department of Civil Engineering: U of MN.

Christian Hellmich, Dr.Tech., Vienna University of Technology
http://whitepages.tuwien.ac.at/oid/998877.html

Lambros Katafygiotis, Ph.D., Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
http://lambros.ce.ust.hk/

Nik Katopodes, Ph.D., University of Michigan
http://www.engin.umich.edu/dept/cee/prospective/

Nicos Makris, University of Patras
http://www.civil.upatras.gr/Melidep_gr/depi_en.asp?profid=5

Robert J. Martinuzzi, P.E., University of Calgary
http://www.ucalgary.ca/pubs/calendar/2005/who/stafflists/academicAlpha.htm

Arif Masud, Ph.D., University of Illinois, Chicago
http://www.uic.edu/depts/bioe/faculty/core_faculty_list.htm

Arvid Naess, Ph.D., Norwegian University of Science and Technology
http://www.bygg.ntnu.no/~arvidn/front.htm

Khaled W. Shahwan, Daimler Chrysler Corporation
http://www.pubs.asce.org/WWWdisplay.cgi?9800592

George Voyiadjis, Ph.D., EIT, Louisiana State University
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Yunping Xi, Ph.D., University of Colorado
http://ceae.colorado.edu/new/faculty/people/people.cgi?xi



Engineering Mechanics Division Executive Committee

Alexander D. Cheng, Ph.D., M.ASCE, Chair
Alexander Cheng Homepage

James L. Beck, Ph.D., M.ASCE
James L. Beck

Roger G. Ghanem, Ph.D., M.ASCE
USC Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering: Roger G. Ghanem

Wilfred D. Iwan, M.ASCE
http://www.eas.caltech.edu/fac_i-m.html#i

Chiang C. Mei, M.ASCE
MIT - Faculty - Chiang C. Mei | Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, MIT

Verna L. Jameson, ASCE Staff Contact

Journal of Engineering Mechanics




More links to civil engineering papers and other information concerning the WTC collapse...




Bazant, Z.P., & Zhou, Y.
"Addendum to 'Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? - Simple Analysis" (pdf)
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 3, (2002): 369-370.

Brannigan, F.L.
"WTC: Lightweight Steel and High-Rise Buildings"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 4, (2002): 145-150.

Clifton, Charles G.
Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers
HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.

"Construction and Collapse Factors"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002): 106-108.

Corbett, G.P.
"Learning and Applying the Lessons of the WTC Disaster"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002.): 133-135.

"Dissecting the Collapses"
Civil Engineering ASCE v. 72, no. 5, (2002): 36-46.

Eagar, T.W., & Musso, C.
"Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation"
JOM v. 53, no. 12, (2001): 8-12.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Therese McAllister, report editor.
World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations
(also available on-line)

Gabrielson, T.B., Poese, M.E., & Atchley, A.A.
"Acoustic and Vibration Background Noise in the Collapsed Structure of the World Trade Center"
The Journal of Acoustical Society of America v. 113, no. 1, (2003): 45-48.

"Collapse Lessons"
Fire Engineering v. 155, no. 10, (2002): 97-103

Marechaux, T.G.
"TMS Hot Topic Symposium Examines WTC Collapse and Building Engineering"
JOM, v. 54, no. 4, (2002): 13-17.

Monahan, B.
"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.

Newland, D.E., & Cebon, D.
"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.

National Instititue of Stamdards and Technology: Congressional and Legislative Affairs
“Learning from 9/11: Understanding the Collapse of the World Trade Center”
Statement of Dr. Arden L. Bement, Jr., before Committee of Science House of Representatives, United States Congress on March 6, 2002.

Pinsker, Lisa, M.
"Applying Geology at the World Trade Center Site"
Geotimes v. 46, no. 11, (2001).
The print copy has 3-D images.

Public Broadcasting Station (PBS)
Why the Towers Fell: A Companion Website to the Television Documentary.
NOVA (Science Programming On Air and Online)

Post, N.M.
"No Code Changes Recommended in World Trade Center Report"
ENR v. 248, no. 14, (2002): 14.

Post, N.M.
"Study Absolves Twin Tower Trusses, Fireproofing"
ENR v. 249, no. 19, (2002): 12-14.

The University of Sydney, Department of Civil Engineering
World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects
A resource site.

"WTC Engineers Credit Design in Saving Thousands of Lives"
ENR v. 247, no. 16, (2001): 12.

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - The Paper

 

[daws101]

ote=daws101;7540193]

You keep telling yourself that.

just a fact you can not dispute

I can ..my wife was a civil engineer ..and her company was just one of an overwhelming majority of engineering firms that have shown that A&E for truff and prof gage are the laughing stock of the industry.

Harry G. Robinson, III, FAIA, AICP, NOMA – Professor and Dean Emeritus, School of Architecture and Design, Howard University. Twice appointed by the President of the United States to be Commissioner and then elected Chairman, United States Commission of Fine Arts. Past President of two major national architectural organizations - National Architectural Accrediting Board, 1996, and National Council of Architectural Registration Boards, 1992. Chairman, UNESCO International Commission on the Goree Memorial and Museum that was established to guide the development of this project in Dakar, Senegal. He has served on major boards and commissions, including the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, Committee for the Preservation of the White House, White House Historical Association and the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Founder and Past Director, Center for Built Environment Studies, Morgan State University. Elected membership in the American Institute of Architects' College of Fellows. In 2003 he was awarded the highest honor bestowed by the Washington Chapter of the AIA, the Centennial Medal. In 2004 he was awarded the District of Columbia Council of Engineering and Architecture Societies Architect of the Year award. Principal, TRG Consulting Global / Architecture, Urban Design, Planning, Project Strategies. Veteran U.S. Army, awarded the Bronze Star for bravery and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"The collapse was too symmetrical to have been eccentrically generated. The destruction was symmetrically initiated to cause the buildings to implode as they did."[/QUOTE]show me his test results and criteria ......if there are none (and there aren't )it's just an opinion and has no evidential value..

 

[eots]

Many......Yet that does not mean that many of them have a clue about bringing down a building, nor does that mean that many of them equals many when you talk about the number of real experts that are out there who do not agree with them......Or at least refuse to sign onto their dumb ass site.......

name your top three outside of NIST...

Below is the list of people who have staked their reputations on the only paper which passed the scrutiny of peer review regarding the WTC tragedy...

For those who may think that no one has written a peer reviewed paper on the collapse of the towers here it is...

"Walter P. Murphy Professor of

Civil Engineering and Materials Science

Northwestern University

The towers of the World Trade Center were designed to withstand as a whole the horizontal impact of a large commercial aircraft. So why did a total collapse occur? The reason is the dynamic consequence of the prolonged heating of the steel columns to very high temperature. The heating caused creep buckling of the columns of the framed tube along the perimeter of the structure, which transmits the vertical load to the ground. The likely scenario of failure may be explained as follows...

http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf

The version linked above, to appear in the Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE), was revised and extended (with Yong Zhou on September 22 and additional appendices on September 28) since the original text of September 13, which was immediately posted at various civil engineering web sites, e.g. University of Illinios. It also has been or soon will be published in a number of other journals, including Archives of Applied Mechanics, Studi i Ricerche, and SIAM News:

Z. P. Bazant and Y. Zhou, "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse?", Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics News, vol. 34, No. 8 (October, 2001).

That means it's not just a document, book, web site or calculation on a forum. It's had to pass critical review by other engineering Professors.

I know there are CT sites which attack this paper but not one person has yet to disprove its hypothesis professionally. There are still people attacking the theory of evolution. Anyone can attack, not many can produce a paper to back it up. Just as there is no "theory of intelligent design" except on Christian web sites, there are no alternatives to this paper other than in CT sites and books."

Why did the World Trade Center towers collapse?

The paper... http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf

http://www.pubs.asce.org/journals/edem.html

Editor:

Ross B. Corotis, Ph.D., P.E., S.E., NAE, University of Colorado, Boulder
[email protected]

http://ceae.colorado.edu/new/faculty/people/people.cgi?corotis

Editorial Board:

Younane Abousleiman, Ph.D., University of Oklahoma MPGE | The University of Oklahoma ||

Ching S. Chang, Ph.D., P.E., University of Massachusetts http://www.ecs.umass.edu/cee/faculty/chang.html

Joel P. Conte, Ph.D., P.E., University of California, San Diego
http://kudu.ucsd.edu/

Henri Gavin, Duke University
Henri P. Gavin | Duke Civil and Environmental Engineering

Bojan B. Guzina, University of Minnesota
People: Department of Civil Engineering: U of MN.

Christian Hellmich, Dr.Tech., Vienna University of Technology
http://whitepages.tuwien.ac.at/oid/998877.html

Lambros Katafygiotis, Ph.D., Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
http://lambros.ce.ust.hk/

Nik Katopodes, Ph.D., University of Michigan
http://www.engin.umich.edu/dept/cee/prospective/

Nicos Makris, University of Patras
http://www.civil.upatras.gr/Melidep_gr/depi_en.asp?profid=5

Robert J. Martinuzzi, P.E., University of Calgary
http://www.ucalgary.ca/pubs/calendar/2005/who/stafflists/academicAlpha.htm

Arif Masud, Ph.D., University of Illinois, Chicago
http://www.uic.edu/depts/bioe/faculty/core_faculty_list.htm

Arvid Naess, Ph.D., Norwegian University of Science and Technology
http://www.bygg.ntnu.no/~arvidn/front.htm

Khaled W. Shahwan, Daimler Chrysler Corporation
http://www.pubs.asce.org/WWWdisplay.cgi?9800592

George Voyiadjis, Ph.D., EIT, Louisiana State University
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Yunping Xi, Ph.D., University of Colorado
http://ceae.colorado.edu/new/faculty/people/people.cgi?xi



Engineering Mechanics Division Executive Committee

Alexander D. Cheng, Ph.D., M.ASCE, Chair
Alexander Cheng Homepage

James L. Beck, Ph.D., M.ASCE
James L. Beck

Roger G. Ghanem, Ph.D., M.ASCE
USC Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering: Roger G. Ghanem

Wilfred D. Iwan, M.ASCE
http://www.eas.caltech.edu/fac_i-m.html#i

Chiang C. Mei, M.ASCE
MIT - Faculty - Chiang C. Mei | Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, MIT

Verna L. Jameson, ASCE Staff Contact

Journal of Engineering Mechanics




More links to civil engineering papers and other information concerning the WTC collapse...




Bazant, Z.P., & Zhou, Y.
"Addendum to 'Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? - Simple Analysis" (pdf)
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 3, (2002): 369-370.

Brannigan, F.L.
"WTC: Lightweight Steel and High-Rise Buildings"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 4, (2002): 145-150.

Clifton, Charles G.
Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers
HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.

"Construction and Collapse Factors"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002): 106-108.

Corbett, G.P.
"Learning and Applying the Lessons of the WTC Disaster"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002.): 133-135.

"Dissecting the Collapses"
Civil Engineering ASCE v. 72, no. 5, (2002): 36-46.

Eagar, T.W., & Musso, C.
"Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation"
JOM v. 53, no. 12, (2001): 8-12.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Therese McAllister, report editor.
World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations
(also available on-line)

Gabrielson, T.B., Poese, M.E., & Atchley, A.A.
"Acoustic and Vibration Background Noise in the Collapsed Structure of the World Trade Center"
The Journal of Acoustical Society of America v. 113, no. 1, (2003): 45-48.

"Collapse Lessons"
Fire Engineering v. 155, no. 10, (2002): 97-103

Marechaux, T.G.
"TMS Hot Topic Symposium Examines WTC Collapse and Building Engineering"
JOM, v. 54, no. 4, (2002): 13-17.

Monahan, B.
"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.

Newland, D.E., & Cebon, D.
"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.

National Instititue of Stamdards and Technology: Congressional and Legislative Affairs
“Learning from 9/11: Understanding the Collapse of the World Trade Center”
Statement of Dr. Arden L. Bement, Jr., before Committee of Science House of Representatives, United States Congress on March 6, 2002.

Pinsker, Lisa, M.
"Applying Geology at the World Trade Center Site"
Geotimes v. 46, no. 11, (2001).
The print copy has 3-D images.

Public Broadcasting Station (PBS)
Why the Towers Fell: A Companion Website to the Television Documentary.
NOVA (Science Programming On Air and Online)

Post, N.M.
"No Code Changes Recommended in World Trade Center Report"
ENR v. 248, no. 14, (2002): 14.

Post, N.M.
"Study Absolves Twin Tower Trusses, Fireproofing"
ENR v. 249, no. 19, (2002): 12-14.

The University of Sydney, Department of Civil Engineering
World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects
A resource site.

"WTC Engineers Credit Design in Saving Thousands of Lives"
ENR v. 247, no. 16, (2001): 12.

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - The Paper

whats this .0000001 of engineers....lol

 

[daws101]

name your top three outside of NIST...

Below is the list of people who have staked their reputations on the only paper which passed the scrutiny of peer review regarding the WTC tragedy...

For those who may think that no one has written a peer reviewed paper on the collapse of the towers here it is...

"Walter P. Murphy Professor of

Civil Engineering and Materials Science

Northwestern University

The towers of the World Trade Center were designed to withstand as a whole the horizontal impact of a large commercial aircraft. So why did a total collapse occur? The reason is the dynamic consequence of the prolonged heating of the steel columns to very high temperature. The heating caused creep buckling of the columns of the framed tube along the perimeter of the structure, which transmits the vertical load to the ground. The likely scenario of failure may be explained as follows...

http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf

The version linked above, to appear in the Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE), was revised and extended (with Yong Zhou on September 22 and additional appendices on September 28) since the original text of September 13, which was immediately posted at various civil engineering web sites, e.g. University of Illinios. It also has been or soon will be published in a number of other journals, including Archives of Applied Mechanics, Studi i Ricerche, and SIAM News:

Z. P. Bazant and Y. Zhou, "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse?", Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics News, vol. 34, No. 8 (October, 2001).

That means it's not just a document, book, web site or calculation on a forum. It's had to pass critical review by other engineering Professors.

I know there are CT sites which attack this paper but not one person has yet to disprove its hypothesis professionally. There are still people attacking the theory of evolution. Anyone can attack, not many can produce a paper to back it up. Just as there is no "theory of intelligent design" except on Christian web sites, there are no alternatives to this paper other than in CT sites and books."

Why did the World Trade Center towers collapse?

The paper... http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf

http://www.pubs.asce.org/journals/edem.html

Editor:

Ross B. Corotis, Ph.D., P.E., S.E., NAE, University of Colorado, Boulder
[email protected]

http://ceae.colorado.edu/new/faculty/people/people.cgi?corotis

Editorial Board:

Younane Abousleiman, Ph.D., University of Oklahoma MPGE | The University of Oklahoma ||

Ching S. Chang, Ph.D., P.E., University of Massachusetts http://www.ecs.umass.edu/cee/faculty/chang.html

Joel P. Conte, Ph.D., P.E., University of California, San Diego
http://kudu.ucsd.edu/

Henri Gavin, Duke University
Henri P. Gavin | Duke Civil and Environmental Engineering

Bojan B. Guzina, University of Minnesota
People: Department of Civil Engineering: U of MN.

Christian Hellmich, Dr.Tech., Vienna University of Technology
http://whitepages.tuwien.ac.at/oid/998877.html

Lambros Katafygiotis, Ph.D., Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
http://lambros.ce.ust.hk/

Nik Katopodes, Ph.D., University of Michigan
http://www.engin.umich.edu/dept/cee/prospective/

Nicos Makris, University of Patras
http://www.civil.upatras.gr/Melidep_gr/depi_en.asp?profid=5

Robert J. Martinuzzi, P.E., University of Calgary
http://www.ucalgary.ca/pubs/calendar/2005/who/stafflists/academicAlpha.htm

Arif Masud, Ph.D., University of Illinois, Chicago
http://www.uic.edu/depts/bioe/faculty/core_faculty_list.htm

Arvid Naess, Ph.D., Norwegian University of Science and Technology
http://www.bygg.ntnu.no/~arvidn/front.htm

Khaled W. Shahwan, Daimler Chrysler Corporation
http://www.pubs.asce.org/WWWdisplay.cgi?9800592

George Voyiadjis, Ph.D., EIT, Louisiana State University
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Yunping Xi, Ph.D., University of Colorado
http://ceae.colorado.edu/new/faculty/people/people.cgi?xi



Engineering Mechanics Division Executive Committee

Alexander D. Cheng, Ph.D., M.ASCE, Chair
Alexander Cheng Homepage

James L. Beck, Ph.D., M.ASCE
James L. Beck

Roger G. Ghanem, Ph.D., M.ASCE
USC Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering: Roger G. Ghanem

Wilfred D. Iwan, M.ASCE
http://www.eas.caltech.edu/fac_i-m.html#i

Chiang C. Mei, M.ASCE
MIT - Faculty - Chiang C. Mei | Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, MIT

Verna L. Jameson, ASCE Staff Contact

Journal of Engineering Mechanics




More links to civil engineering papers and other information concerning the WTC collapse...




Bazant, Z.P., & Zhou, Y.
"Addendum to 'Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? - Simple Analysis" (pdf)
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 3, (2002): 369-370.

Brannigan, F.L.
"WTC: Lightweight Steel and High-Rise Buildings"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 4, (2002): 145-150.

Clifton, Charles G.
Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers
HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.

"Construction and Collapse Factors"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002): 106-108.

Corbett, G.P.
"Learning and Applying the Lessons of the WTC Disaster"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002.): 133-135.

"Dissecting the Collapses"
Civil Engineering ASCE v. 72, no. 5, (2002): 36-46.

Eagar, T.W., & Musso, C.
"Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation"
JOM v. 53, no. 12, (2001): 8-12.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Therese McAllister, report editor.
World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations
(also available on-line)

Gabrielson, T.B., Poese, M.E., & Atchley, A.A.
"Acoustic and Vibration Background Noise in the Collapsed Structure of the World Trade Center"
The Journal of Acoustical Society of America v. 113, no. 1, (2003): 45-48.

"Collapse Lessons"
Fire Engineering v. 155, no. 10, (2002): 97-103

Marechaux, T.G.
"TMS Hot Topic Symposium Examines WTC Collapse and Building Engineering"
JOM, v. 54, no. 4, (2002): 13-17.

Monahan, B.
"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.

Newland, D.E., & Cebon, D.
"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.

National Instititue of Stamdards and Technology: Congressional and Legislative Affairs
“Learning from 9/11: Understanding the Collapse of the World Trade Center”
Statement of Dr. Arden L. Bement, Jr., before Committee of Science House of Representatives, United States Congress on March 6, 2002.

Pinsker, Lisa, M.
"Applying Geology at the World Trade Center Site"
Geotimes v. 46, no. 11, (2001).
The print copy has 3-D images.

Public Broadcasting Station (PBS)
Why the Towers Fell: A Companion Website to the Television Documentary.
NOVA (Science Programming On Air and Online)

Post, N.M.
"No Code Changes Recommended in World Trade Center Report"
ENR v. 248, no. 14, (2002): 14.

Post, N.M.
"Study Absolves Twin Tower Trusses, Fireproofing"
ENR v. 249, no. 19, (2002): 12-14.

The University of Sydney, Department of Civil Engineering
World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects
A resource site.

"WTC Engineers Credit Design in Saving Thousands of Lives"
ENR v. 247, no. 16, (2001): 12.

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - The Paper

whats this .0000001 of engineers....lol

eots does the twoofer two step and sidesteps an answer!

 

[eots]

Just using your own argument...I wonder who has the better understanding scientific method dawgshits or Lynn Margulis. PhD ? who like Deets has received presidential honors in science and a Divinchi award

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elq9-q9YGo4]9/11 Research and the Scientific Method - Lynn Margulis. PhD - Scientist - YouTube[/ame]

 

[daws101]

Just using your own argument...I wonder who has the better understanding scientific method dawgshits or Lynn Margulis. PhD ? who like Deets has received presidential honors in science and a Divinchi award

9/11 Research and the Scientific Method - Lynn Margulis. PhD - Scientist - YouTube

didn't you use this clip to to cover your appalling ignorance of the scientific method?
also she's biased and has no experience in any of the necessary fields to be a qualified investigator.

as always you've fucked yourself.

 

[eots]

Just using your own argument...I wonder who has the better understanding scientific method dawgshits or Lynn Margulis. PhD ? who like Deets has received presidential honors in science and a Divinchi award

9/11 Research and the Scientific Method - Lynn Margulis. PhD - Scientist - YouTube

didn't you use this clip to to cover your appalling ignorance of the scientific method?
also she's biased and has no experience in any of the necessary fields to be a qualified investigator.

as always you've fucked yourself.

She eminently qualified in scientific method and has been honered by both peer and the nation as such..to say anything else is just babbling nonsense

 

[daws101]

Just using your own argument...I wonder who has the better understanding scientific method dawgshits or Lynn Margulis. PhD ? who like Deets has received presidential honors in science and a Divinchi award

9/11 Research and the Scientific Method - Lynn Margulis. PhD - Scientist - YouTube

didn't you use this clip to to cover your appalling ignorance of the scientific method?
also she's biased and has no experience in any of the necessary fields to be a qualified investigator.

as always you've fucked yourself.

She eminently qualified in scientific method and has been honered by both peer and the nation as such..to say anything else is just babbling nonsense

that's not an answer to the question I ask .
as always you're overdoing the accolades...at best there's maybe 10,000 people in the whole world who know who she is ...a lot less have any idea what she does.
either way she's irrelevant to this discussion.. kinda like everything you post.

 

[eots]

didn't you use this clip to to cover your appalling ignorance of the scientific method?
Also she's biased and has no experience in any of the necessary fields to be a qualified investigator.

As always you've fucked yourself.

she eminently qualified in scientific method and has been honered by both peer and the nation as such..to say anything else is just babbling nonsense

that's not an answer to the question i ask .
As always you're overdoing the accolades...at best there's maybe 10,000 people in the whole world who know who she is ...a lot less have any idea what she does.
Either way she's irrelevant to this discussion.. Kinda like everything you post.

She is an expert in the scientific method and given high honors from both country and her peer scientist as such..this makes her criticisms of NISTs scientifc method relevant and valid

 

[daws101]

she eminently qualified in scientific method and has been honered by both peer and the nation as such..to say anything else is just babbling nonsense

that's not an answer to the question i ask .
As always you're overdoing the accolades...at best there's maybe 10,000 people in the whole world who know who she is ...a lot less have any idea what she does.
Either way she's irrelevant to this discussion.. Kinda like everything you post.

She is an expert in the scientific method and given high honors from both country and her peer scientist as such..this makes her criticisms of NISTs scientifc method relevant and valid

no it doesn't...and it's still not an answer.

 

[daws101]

Wildcard
You are wrong about 9/11 and Sandy Hook, because you are a lying sack-of-shit!

 

[eots]

Wildcard
You are wrong about 9/11 and Sandy Hook, because you are a lying sack-of-shit!

dawgshit debwunking 101 when flailing quickly change the subject

 

[eots]

that's not an answer to the question i ask .
As always you're overdoing the accolades...at best there's maybe 10,000 people in the whole world who know who she is ...a lot less have any idea what she does.
Either way she's irrelevant to this discussion.. Kinda like everything you post.

She is an expert in the scientific method and given high honors from both country and her peer scientist as such..this makes her criticisms of NISTs scientifc method relevant and valid

no it doesn't...and it's still not an answer.

the loser just says "no it doesn't "..like a child offering nothing to support his claim this woman honered for her science and scientific method is not qualified to speak on scientific method...and still not an answer to what ?...you posed no question

 

[daws101]

Wildcard
You are wrong about 9/11 and Sandy Hook, because you are a lying sack-of-shit!

dawgshit debwunking 101 when flailing quickly change the subject

as always wrong !
I just posted that because wildcard is too chicken shit to talk his trash in public...
thanks for showcasing your ability to make false assumptions on little or no evidence!

 

[daws101]

and btw do I give the slightest credence to her opinion on the issues of mitochondrial symbiosis, the answer is an unqualified "Yup".

if you mean, do I give the slightest credence to her opinion on the issues of 9/11, the answer is an unqualified "Nope".

For precisely the same reason the same reason that I give zero credence to the opinions of Steven Jones.

Both are absolute amateurs in ANY of the pertinent fields.

 

[eots]

Wildcard
You are wrong about 9/11 and Sandy Hook, because you are a lying sack-of-shit!

dawgshit debwunking 101 when flailing quickly change the subject

as always wrong !
I just posted that because wildcard is too chicken shit to talk his trash in public...
thanks for showcasing your ability to make false assumptions on little or no evidence!

ya sure you did...

 

[daws101]

dawgshit debwunking 101 when flailing quickly change the subject

as always wrong !
I just posted that because wildcard is too chicken shit to talk his trash in public...
thanks for showcasing your ability to make false assumptions on little or no evidence!

ya sure you did...

thanks again....!

 

[eots]

and btw do I give the slightest credence to her opinion on the issues of mitochondrial symbiosis, the answer is an unqualified "Yup".

if you mean, do I give the slightest credence to her opinion on the issues of 9/11, the answer is an unqualified "Nope".

For precisely the same reason the same reason that I give zero credence to the opinions of Steven Jones.

Both are absolute amateurs in ANY of the pertinent fields.

scientific method does not change from one area of study to the next, scientific method remains the same

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw1V54X4T7c]Robert McCoy -- High-rise Architect - 9/11 Expert Testimony.mp4 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[daws101]

and btw do I give the slightest credence to her opinion on the issues of mitochondrial symbiosis, the answer is an unqualified "Yup".

if you mean, do I give the slightest credence to her opinion on the issues of 9/11, the answer is an unqualified "Nope".

For precisely the same reason the same reason that I give zero credence to the opinions of Steven Jones.

Both are absolute amateurs in ANY of the pertinent fields.

scientific method does not change from one area of study to the next, scientific method remains the same

that would be true but she has no experience in the pertinent fields....
that's the same as you criticizing just about everything with no idea of what's involved.