Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong he did not state truth he stated myth.It was a CIA-backed military coup. Get over it.
agent dawgshit posted a laugh to your post because the truth hurts his feelings and his handlers people like you are awake to this truth.
all and all
people nowadays dont't have the stamina....I think? do they? may be they do
that's it
Spector excluded no one of consequence.all and all
people nowadays dont't have the stamina....I think? do they? may be they do
that's it
It came from the front. Specter covered that up by refusing to put on the record those who would've fingered the driver's shot. This case was closed almost five years ago.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
It's snippets of evidence such as this that make the internet so awesome. It is only logical that many people would have been willing say they saw the driver shoot jfk. This is one of the most obvious facts exposing government evil that has been found thus far. Imagining a world with more truths such as this is much less a dream than ever before. It's a real possibility if the willingness can extend significantly outward. Somebody refers to a specific person and the front excludes the grassy snow job. Greer provided an ironic photo a billion times over if the image was taken after the assassination?
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Ronald Coy Jones, ronald coy jones - Google Search
"We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either."
Nothing of value here December 28, 2013
The intro is posted in full on Amazon.com. Click the link below and scroll down. The shooter they would have named could've only been the driver of jfk's limousine. As a last resort click the book link to reach the introduction.
We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 Kindle Edition
by Allen Childs MD (Author) 2013 Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
Alexander J. Marciniszyn was the person who wrote the short review that included that many eyewitnesses saw somebody shoot the President from the front.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Jones, 'We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either.'" Not much of a revelation to anyone who's studied the Kennedy assassination in depth. This author just throws up his hands in a "what is history and what is real or not?" kind of way at the end.
Spector excluded no one of consequence.all and all
people nowadays dont't have the stamina....I think? do they? may be they do
that's it
It came from the front. Specter covered that up by refusing to put on the record those who would've fingered the driver's shot. This case was closed almost five years ago.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
It's snippets of evidence such as this that make the internet so awesome. It is only logical that many people would have been willing say they saw the driver shoot jfk. This is one of the most obvious facts exposing government evil that has been found thus far. Imagining a world with more truths such as this is much less a dream than ever before. It's a real possibility if the willingness can extend significantly outward. Somebody refers to a specific person and the front excludes the grassy snow job. Greer provided an ironic photo a billion times over if the image was taken after the assassination?
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Ronald Coy Jones, ronald coy jones - Google Search
"We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either."
Nothing of value here December 28, 2013
The intro is posted in full on Amazon.com. Click the link below and scroll down. The shooter they would have named could've only been the driver of jfk's limousine. As a last resort click the book link to reach the introduction.
We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 Kindle Edition
by Allen Childs MD (Author) 2013 Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
Alexander J. Marciniszyn was the person who wrote the short review that included that many eyewitnesses saw somebody shoot the President from the front.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Jones, 'We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either.'" Not much of a revelation to anyone who's studied the Kennedy assassination in depth. This author just throws up his hands in a "what is history and what is real or not?" kind of way at the end.
All of the evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter.
The fatal bullet entered from above and behind as the autopsy proves beyond question.
The case was closed in 64 with the release of the WC report.
Your efforts fail
Spector excluded no one of consequence.all and all
people nowadays dont't have the stamina....I think? do they? may be they do
that's it
It came from the front. Specter covered that up by refusing to put on the record those who would've fingered the driver's shot. This case was closed almost five years ago.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
It's snippets of evidence such as this that make the internet so awesome. It is only logical that many people would have been willing say they saw the driver shoot jfk. This is one of the most obvious facts exposing government evil that has been found thus far. Imagining a world with more truths such as this is much less a dream than ever before. It's a real possibility if the willingness can extend significantly outward. Somebody refers to a specific person and the front excludes the grassy snow job. Greer provided an ironic photo a billion times over if the image was taken after the assassination?
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Ronald Coy Jones, ronald coy jones - Google Search
"We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either."
Nothing of value here December 28, 2013
The intro is posted in full on Amazon.com. Click the link below and scroll down. The shooter they would have named could've only been the driver of jfk's limousine. As a last resort click the book link to reach the introduction.
We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 Kindle Edition
by Allen Childs MD (Author) 2013 Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
Alexander J. Marciniszyn was the person who wrote the short review that included that many eyewitnesses saw somebody shoot the President from the front.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Jones, 'We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either.'" Not much of a revelation to anyone who's studied the Kennedy assassination in depth. This author just throws up his hands in a "what is history and what is real or not?" kind of way at the end.
All of the evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter.
The fatal bullet entered from above and behind as the autopsy proves beyond question.
The case was closed in 64 with the release of the WC report.
Your efforts fail
Spector excluded no one of consequence.all and all
people nowadays dont't have the stamina....I think? do they? may be they do
that's it
It came from the front. Specter covered that up by refusing to put on the record those who would've fingered the driver's shot. This case was closed almost five years ago.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
It's snippets of evidence such as this that make the internet so awesome. It is only logical that many people would have been willing say they saw the driver shoot jfk. This is one of the most obvious facts exposing government evil that has been found thus far. Imagining a world with more truths such as this is much less a dream than ever before. It's a real possibility if the willingness can extend significantly outward. Somebody refers to a specific person and the front excludes the grassy snow job. Greer provided an ironic photo a billion times over if the image was taken after the assassination?
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Ronald Coy Jones, ronald coy jones - Google Search
"We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either."
Nothing of value here December 28, 2013
The intro is posted in full on Amazon.com. Click the link below and scroll down. The shooter they would have named could've only been the driver of jfk's limousine. As a last resort click the book link to reach the introduction.
We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 Kindle Edition
by Allen Childs MD (Author) 2013 Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
Alexander J. Marciniszyn was the person who wrote the short review that included that many eyewitnesses saw somebody shoot the President from the front.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Jones, 'We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either.'" Not much of a revelation to anyone who's studied the Kennedy assassination in depth. This author just throws up his hands in a "what is history and what is real or not?" kind of way at the end.
All of the evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter.
The fatal bullet entered from above and behind as the autopsy proves beyond question.
The case was closed in 64 with the release of the WC report.
Your efforts fail
Spector excluded countless eyewitnesses who would've fingered Greer.
All of the evidence proves Greer was the only shooter to shoot jfk's head off.
The fatal bullet entered above the right eye and exited the right rear.
The case was closed five years ago.
Your stupidity always failed, long before I arrived.
Spector excluded no one of consequence.all and all
people nowadays dont't have the stamina....I think? do they? may be they do
that's it
It came from the front. Specter covered that up by refusing to put on the record those who would've fingered the driver's shot. This case was closed almost five years ago.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
It's snippets of evidence such as this that make the internet so awesome. It is only logical that many people would have been willing say they saw the driver shoot jfk. This is one of the most obvious facts exposing government evil that has been found thus far. Imagining a world with more truths such as this is much less a dream than ever before. It's a real possibility if the willingness can extend significantly outward. Somebody refers to a specific person and the front excludes the grassy snow job. Greer provided an ironic photo a billion times over if the image was taken after the assassination?
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Ronald Coy Jones, ronald coy jones - Google Search
"We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either."
Nothing of value here December 28, 2013
The intro is posted in full on Amazon.com. Click the link below and scroll down. The shooter they would have named could've only been the driver of jfk's limousine. As a last resort click the book link to reach the introduction.
We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 Kindle Edition
by Allen Childs MD (Author) 2013 Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
Alexander J. Marciniszyn was the person who wrote the short review that included that many eyewitnesses saw somebody shoot the President from the front.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Jones, 'We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either.'" Not much of a revelation to anyone who's studied the Kennedy assassination in depth. This author just throws up his hands in a "what is history and what is real or not?" kind of way at the end.
All of the evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter.
The fatal bullet entered from above and behind as the autopsy proves beyond question.
The case was closed in 64 with the release of the WC report.
Your efforts fail
Exactly. Oswald killed Kennedy. Oswald was in league with others probably high up. That was why he was killed before he got a chance to talk.
Spector excluded no one of consequence.all and all
people nowadays dont't have the stamina....I think? do they? may be they do
that's it
It came from the front. Specter covered that up by refusing to put on the record those who would've fingered the driver's shot. This case was closed almost five years ago.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
It's snippets of evidence such as this that make the internet so awesome. It is only logical that many people would have been willing say they saw the driver shoot jfk. This is one of the most obvious facts exposing government evil that has been found thus far. Imagining a world with more truths such as this is much less a dream than ever before. It's a real possibility if the willingness can extend significantly outward. Somebody refers to a specific person and the front excludes the grassy snow job. Greer provided an ironic photo a billion times over if the image was taken after the assassination?
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Ronald Coy Jones, ronald coy jones - Google Search
"We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either."
Nothing of value here December 28, 2013
The intro is posted in full on Amazon.com. Click the link below and scroll down. The shooter they would have named could've only been the driver of jfk's limousine. As a last resort click the book link to reach the introduction.
We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 Kindle Edition
by Allen Childs MD (Author) 2013 Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
Alexander J. Marciniszyn was the person who wrote the short review that included that many eyewitnesses saw somebody shoot the President from the front.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Jones, 'We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either.'" Not much of a revelation to anyone who's studied the Kennedy assassination in depth. This author just throws up his hands in a "what is history and what is real or not?" kind of way at the end.
All of the evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter.
The fatal bullet entered from above and behind as the autopsy proves beyond question.
The case was closed in 64 with the release of the WC report.
Your efforts fail
Exactly. Oswald killed Kennedy. Oswald was in league with others probably high up. That was why he was killed before he got a chance to talk.
There is no evidence Oswald was in league with others.
He did talk with many people before he was killed which ruins that silly theory.
Spector excluded no one of consequence.all and all
people nowadays dont't have the stamina....I think? do they? may be they do
that's it
It came from the front. Specter covered that up by refusing to put on the record those who would've fingered the driver's shot. This case was closed almost five years ago.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
It's snippets of evidence such as this that make the internet so awesome. It is only logical that many people would have been willing say they saw the driver shoot jfk. This is one of the most obvious facts exposing government evil that has been found thus far. Imagining a world with more truths such as this is much less a dream than ever before. It's a real possibility if the willingness can extend significantly outward. Somebody refers to a specific person and the front excludes the grassy snow job. Greer provided an ironic photo a billion times over if the image was taken after the assassination?
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Ronald Coy Jones, ronald coy jones - Google Search
"We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either."
Nothing of value here December 28, 2013
The intro is posted in full on Amazon.com. Click the link below and scroll down. The shooter they would have named could've only been the driver of jfk's limousine. As a last resort click the book link to reach the introduction.
We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 Kindle Edition
by Allen Childs MD (Author) 2013 Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
Alexander J. Marciniszyn was the person who wrote the short review that included that many eyewitnesses saw somebody shoot the President from the front.
Amazon.com: We Were There: Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22, 1963 eBook: Allen Childs MD: Kindle Store
In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Jones, 'We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either.'" Not much of a revelation to anyone who's studied the Kennedy assassination in depth. This author just throws up his hands in a "what is history and what is real or not?" kind of way at the end.
All of the evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter.
The fatal bullet entered from above and behind as the autopsy proves beyond question.
The case was closed in 64 with the release of the WC report.
Your efforts fail
Exactly. Oswald killed Kennedy. Oswald was in league with others probably high up. That was why he was killed before he got a chance to talk.
There is no evidence Oswald was in league with others.
He did talk with many people before he was killed which ruins that silly theory.
Yeah I didn't say it was fact. I wasn't aware he talked to anyone other than law enforcement. He wasn't held in jail with the general prison population. Where do you get that information?
Hmmm, Oswald held one presser and it was on the same day JFK was shot.
It's possible that he thought that those who he conspired with were going to fix everything and he was shot because they never planned on letting him live more than a day or two.
Hmmm, Oswald held one presser and it was on the same day JFK was shot.
It's possible that he thought that those who he conspired with were going to fix everything and he was shot because they never planned on letting him live more than a day or two.
Hmmm, Oswald held one presser and it was on the same day JFK was shot.
It's possible that he thought that those who he conspired with were going to fix everything and he was shot because they never planned on letting him live more than a day or two.
It was more than one.
The media were virtually encamped in the corridors and he was routinely led through those corridors and allowed to speak to them.
In addition if he were killed for such reasons it would absolutely mean Ruby was part of the conspiracy and would also have to be silenced.
Ruby lived on for years and maintained until he died that he acted alone.
Anything is possible but no evidence supports any of the conspiracy theories
Hmmm, Oswald held one presser and it was on the same day JFK was shot.
It's possible that he thought that those who he conspired with were going to fix everything and he was shot because they never planned on letting him live more than a day or two.
If they ( a mysterious fictional entity ) were going to set him up it would be senseless to let him live at all he would have been killed in the book depository or the theater of his boarding house or any other number of places without being allowed to speak to ANYONE.
Hmmm, Oswald held one presser and it was on the same day JFK was shot.
It's possible that he thought that those who he conspired with were going to fix everything and he was shot because they never planned on letting him live more than a day or two.
It was more than one.
The media were virtually encamped in the corridors and he was routinely led through those corridors and allowed to speak to them.
In addition if he were killed for such reasons it would absolutely mean Ruby was part of the conspiracy and would also have to be silenced.
Ruby lived on for years and maintained until he died that he acted alone.
Anything is possible but no evidence supports any of the conspiracy theories
Ruby knew he was dying. Quite possibly he was told his family would be taken care of.
Btw, when I searched, only one press conference showed up.
Hmmm, Oswald held one presser and it was on the same day JFK was shot.
It's possible that he thought that those who he conspired with were going to fix everything and he was shot because they never planned on letting him live more than a day or two.
If they ( a mysterious fictional entity ) were going to set him up it would be senseless to let him live at all he would have been killed in the book depository or the theater of his boarding house or any other number of places without being allowed to speak to ANYONE.
What if he was told he would get off either on an arranged technicality, or tampered evidence. Maybe they didn't expect him to get caught. Perhaps his getaway was fouled up in some way.
Hmmm, Oswald held one presser and it was on the same day JFK was shot.
It's possible that he thought that those who he conspired with were going to fix everything and he was shot because they never planned on letting him live more than a day or two.
If they ( a mysterious fictional entity ) were going to set him up it would be senseless to let him live at all he would have been killed in the book depository or the theater of his boarding house or any other number of places without being allowed to speak to ANYONE.
What if he was told he would get off either on an arranged technicality, or tampered evidence. Maybe they didn't expect him to get caught. Perhaps his getaway was fouled up in some way.
So now you are claiming that a sophisticated group of masterminds planned the detailed assassination of the president ( with no evidence ) and yet somehow failed to plan how to deal with the loose end of Oswald who would have been either a scapegoat or active shooter or both.
Playing what ifs are meaningless. Maybes are meaningless. The facts and evidence support no such imaginings
Hmmm, Oswald held one presser and it was on the same day JFK was shot.
It's possible that he thought that those who he conspired with were going to fix everything and he was shot because they never planned on letting him live more than a day or two.
If they ( a mysterious fictional entity ) were going to set him up it would be senseless to let him live at all he would have been killed in the book depository or the theater of his boarding house or any other number of places without being allowed to speak to ANYONE.
What if he was told he would get off either on an arranged technicality, or tampered evidence. Maybe they didn't expect him to get caught. Perhaps his getaway was fouled up in some way.
So now you are claiming that a sophisticated group of masterminds planned the detailed assassination of the president ( with no evidence ) and yet somehow failed to plan how to deal with the loose end of Oswald who would have been either a scapegoat or active shooter or both.
Playing what ifs are meaningless. Maybes are meaningless. The facts and evidence support no such imaginings
Yeah, I'm just speculating. It seems very suspicious to me. If you don't want to play along, if you get too annoyed with the what ifs and maybes, you know you can just ignore my posts right?
