The Judicial Branch now determines immigration policy

[Votto]

I'm not sure what laws Trump has broken exactly with his temporary immigration ban. Perhaps someone could tell me.


Additionally, it now appears that Progressives have given the courts the duty of deciding what immigrants can enter the country and which can't. Perhaps they could then show me in the Constitution where this is exactly.

But then, just because it is not written in the Constitution does not mean it is not implied to be there, right Progressives? For you see, the Constitution is a living breathing document that allows Progressives to dictate what it really means, or should have said all along had the writers of the Constitution not been slave owners.

 

[Votto]

Should the black robes also be given security briefings like the President has so they can better determine who is safe to bring into the country or should they just wing it like they are doing now?

I'm thinking the later cuz they are so damned enlightened and intelligent they don't need to know such trivial things.

After all, immigration is a natural right that the Founding Fathers would have supported but simply knew that it was so self evident that they need not put such trivial matters into the Constitution.

 

[Votto]

Unless you are Donald Trump, but I think that is only common sense because everything he says and does is racist and not Constitutional so it can all be ignored.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The US Constitution says nothing about immigration legal or not. It does however state a US President is in charge of securing our country from enemies foreign and domestic.

Even though the EO says nothing about Muslims, they are trying to say it goes against our freedom of religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion for our citizens, but how the court was able to extend that right outside of our borders is beyond me.

 

[washamericom]

Should the black robes also be given security briefings like the President has so they can better determine who is safe to bring into the country or should they just wing it like they are doing now?

I'm thinking the later cuz they are so damned enlightened and intelligent they don't need to know such trivial things.

After all, immigration is a natural right that the Founding Fathers would have supported but simply knew that it was so self evident that they need not put such trivial matters into the Constitution.

i think we all want immigration.... legal though. we have laws on the books about how to enter and become a citizen.
we just don't want boston bombings, orlando, kate steinle etc...

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Should the black robes also be given security briefings like the President has so they can better determine who is safe to bring into the country or should they just wing it like they are doing now?

I'm thinking the later cuz they are so damned enlightened and intelligent they don't need to know such trivial things.

After all, immigration is a natural right that the Founding Fathers would have supported but simply knew that it was so self evident that they need not put such trivial matters into the Constitution.

i think we all want immigration.... legal though. we have laws on the books about how to enter and become a citizen.
we just don't want boston bombings, orlando, kate steinle etc...

We also don't want people coming here turning our country into a bilingual nation. I miss the good ole days when signs and ballots were printed in English only.

 

[MattMc750]

I'm not sure what laws Trump has broken exactly with his temporary immigration ban. Perhaps someone could tell me.


Additionally, it now appears that Progressives have given the courts the duty of deciding what immigrants can enter the country and which can't. Perhaps they could then show me in the Constitution where this is exactly.

But then, just because it is not written in the Constitution does not mean it is not implied to be there, right Progressives? For you see, the Constitution is a living breathing document that allows Progressives to dictate what it really means, or should have said all along had the writers of the Constitution not been slave owners.

No one can tell you, because he hasn't broken any law nor has he violated the constitution with the temporary ban.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Billy_Bob]

The US Constitution says nothing about immigration legal or not. It does however state a US President is in charge of securing our country from enemies foreign and domestic.

Even though the EO says nothing about Muslims, they are trying to say it goes against our freedom of religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion for our citizens, but how the court was able to extend that right outside of our borders is beyond me.

I hope the 9th Circus Court of appeals will rule as they did for Obama and keep the separations of powers as they should be..

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

The Internet has named Trump SCROTUS

So
Called
Ruler
Of
The
United
States

 

[Votto]

The US Constitution says nothing about immigration legal or not. It does however state a US President is in charge of securing our country from enemies foreign and domestic.

Even though the EO says nothing about Muslims, they are trying to say it goes against our freedom of religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion for our citizens, but how the court was able to extend that right outside of our borders is beyond me.

Trump did not outlaw immigration of Muslims dinglebertry.

Stop listening to the fake news like CNN or MSNBC Heehaw.

No, Trump banned the top terrorist countries in the world. They just so happen to all be Muslim

Go figure.

In fact, Muslims from other countries could come over without any problem at all.

 

[Votto]

I'm not sure what laws Trump has broken exactly with his temporary immigration ban. Perhaps someone could tell me.


Additionally, it now appears that Progressives have given the courts the duty of deciding what immigrants can enter the country and which can't. Perhaps they could then show me in the Constitution where this is exactly.

But then, just because it is not written in the Constitution does not mean it is not implied to be there, right Progressives? For you see, the Constitution is a living breathing document that allows Progressives to dictate what it really means, or should have said all along had the writers of the Constitution not been slave owners.

No one can tell you, because he hasn't broken any law nor has he violated the constitution with the temporary ban.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

The Constitution is a living breathing document that judges will determine.

In other words, the 9 black robes are the Constitution dingleberry.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The US Constitution says nothing about immigration legal or not. It does however state a US President is in charge of securing our country from enemies foreign and domestic.

Even though the EO says nothing about Muslims, they are trying to say it goes against our freedom of religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion for our citizens, but how the court was able to extend that right outside of our borders is beyond me.

I hope the 9th Circus Court of appeals will rule as they did for Obama and keep the separations of powers as they should be..

Nope, they ruled this morning:

Appeals court denies Trump request to immediately reinstate travel ban

 

[Billy_Bob]

The US Constitution says nothing about immigration legal or not. It does however state a US President is in charge of securing our country from enemies foreign and domestic.

Even though the EO says nothing about Muslims, they are trying to say it goes against our freedom of religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion for our citizens, but how the court was able to extend that right outside of our borders is beyond me.

I hope the 9th Circus Court of appeals will rule as they did for Obama and keep the separations of powers as they should be..

Nope, they ruled this morning:

Appeals court denies Trump request to immediately reinstate travel ban

Off we go to SCOTUS.. Right after the presentations on Monday to the Circus..

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The US Constitution says nothing about immigration legal or not. It does however state a US President is in charge of securing our country from enemies foreign and domestic.

Even though the EO says nothing about Muslims, they are trying to say it goes against our freedom of religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion for our citizens, but how the court was able to extend that right outside of our borders is beyond me.

Trump did not outlaw immigration of Muslims dinglebertry.

Stop listening to the fake news like CNN or MSNBC Heehaw.

No, Trump banned the top terrorist countries in the world. They just so happen to all be Muslim

Go figure.

In fact, Muslims from other countries could come over without any problem at all.

I never said Trump did, it's just they are using religion to support their case even though it isn't so. Most Muslims are allowed in this country.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The US Constitution says nothing about immigration legal or not. It does however state a US President is in charge of securing our country from enemies foreign and domestic.

Even though the EO says nothing about Muslims, they are trying to say it goes against our freedom of religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion for our citizens, but how the court was able to extend that right outside of our borders is beyond me.

I hope the 9th Circus Court of appeals will rule as they did for Obama and keep the separations of powers as they should be..

Nope, they ruled this morning:

Appeals court denies Trump request to immediately reinstate travel ban

Off we go to SCOTUS.. Right after the presentations on Monday to the Circus..

They could still see it Trump's way, it's just that it isn't off to a good start.

 

[Votto]

 

[washamericom]

Should the black robes also be given security briefings like the President has so they can better determine who is safe to bring into the country or should they just wing it like they are doing now?

I'm thinking the later cuz they are so damned enlightened and intelligent they don't need to know such trivial things.

After all, immigration is a natural right that the Founding Fathers would have supported but simply knew that it was so self evident that they need not put such trivial matters into the Constitution.

i think we all want immigration.... legal though. we have laws on the books about how to enter and become a citizen.
we just don't want boston bombings, orlando, kate steinle etc...

We also don't want people coming here turning our country into a bilingual nation. I miss the good ole days when signs and ballots were printed in English only.

montreal has language cops. i'm ok with any language as long as it's english first, for legal standards. once we have a secure border, so many other things will get better, including heroin deaths in America, and the ancillary crime that goes with it.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The US Constitution says nothing about immigration legal or not. It does however state a US President is in charge of securing our country from enemies foreign and domestic.

Even though the EO says nothing about Muslims, they are trying to say it goes against our freedom of religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion for our citizens, but how the court was able to extend that right outside of our borders is beyond me.

I hope the 9th Circus Court of appeals will rule as they did for Obama and keep the separations of powers as they should be..

Nope, they ruled this morning:

Appeals court denies Trump request to immediately reinstate travel ban

Off we go to SCOTUS.. Right after the presentations on Monday to the Circus..

They could still see it Trump's way, it's just that it isn't off to a good start.

Not sure what they based their decision on.. its a slam dunk in Trumps favor.. The law is clear.. Definitely time to clean out the Judiciary filled hacktavisits..

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The US Constitution says nothing about immigration legal or not. It does however state a US President is in charge of securing our country from enemies foreign and domestic.

Even though the EO says nothing about Muslims, they are trying to say it goes against our freedom of religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion for our citizens, but how the court was able to extend that right outside of our borders is beyond me.

I hope the 9th Circus Court of appeals will rule as they did for Obama and keep the separations of powers as they should be..

Nope, they ruled this morning:

Appeals court denies Trump request to immediately reinstate travel ban

Off we go to SCOTUS.. Right after the presentations on Monday to the Circus..

They could still see it Trump's way, it's just that it isn't off to a good start.

Not sure what they based their decision on.. its a slam dunk in Trumps favor.. The law is clear.. Definitely time to clean out the Judiciary filled hacktavisits..

They are just blowing it off until after the weekend. But again, it is the 9th circus court so they will probably pave the way to a Supreme Court hearing.

 

[Kondor3]

In the heyday of immigration to the US, during the century 1840-1940, we needed or wanted, and assimilated, immigrants.

Back then, we were a nation of 50 to 150 millions, with vast tracts of land to give away, and jobs and opportunities for anyone who could make it here.

Today, we're a nation of 310,000,000, and all the land is spoken for, and there aren't enough jobs, and we can't even house and employ all of our own people.

We don't need immigration any longer, as a nation; at least not at the rates and numbers that we experienced in the past.

It would be OK to take-in a few dozen thousand a year, from around the world, properly screened - those bringing skills and talent with them; capable of supporting themselves, or even the occasional helper-of-America overseas who might otherwise be in danger by remaining in-place, or even the occasional hard-luck case.

But we really don't need wave after wave of the Great Unwashed any longer, nor do most thinking Americans really want them any longer.

Time to hang a "Closed for Repairs" or "No Vacancy" sign on the Statue of Liberty, and give immigration a rest for a decade or two or three.