Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll answer that as soon as you answer whether or not a fetus is a life or not. If it's a life, it's capable of being murdered. If it's not, then it cannot be murdered, much like a teddy bear can't be murdered. It can only be destroyed as property.In your scenario is the fetus inside his body?
Nothing happened to the woman’s body. The FATHER decided to have a “safe and legal ABORTION” (which then forced you to result to a completely false narrative). How very progressive of you.A man made a decision about a woman’s body. Very conservative of him.
Very cute effort to exonerate him but he will be charged with homicide. Lots of precedentWhat is confusing about this? The guy poisoned his girlfriend. You want to compare it to abortion for whatever reason, but can’t because abortion is not the man’s decision.You are trying really hard BUT you are failing miserably.^ Man poisons woman, and this dumb Trump sheep says he didn’t do anything to herNothing happened to the woman’s body. The FATHER decided to have a “safe and legal ABORTION” (which then forced you to result to a completely false narrative). How very progressive of you.
Then charge him with poisoning his girlfriend not fetal homicide. You people can't explain the contradiction. Killing a fetus by ripping its limbs off in an abortion is okay because a fetus is not a person, has no rights, its just a lump of cells. If a father kills the fetus then its fetal homicide?
Is 50% of the fetus growing inside the father? Oops.He got 20 years in prison for murder dumbass.He should be convicted, as there is precedent. AND HE POISONED THE WOMAN.Yet another fail lolWhat is confusing about this? The guy poisoned his girlfriend. You want to compare it to abortion for whatever reason, but can’t because abortion is not the man’s decision.You are trying really hard BUT you are failing miserably.
He is charged with the murder of an unborn baby.
Sit & spin bruh, its entertaining
Jesus fucking Christ.
You can't have it both ways. The fetus is either a child or it is not.
Since 50% of the fetus belongs to the father what's the difference if the mother or father kills the fetus? The left can't answer.
The courts have done that. I don’t need to explain anything.I'll answer that as soon as you answer whether or not a fetus is a life or not. If it's a life, it's capable of being murdered. If it's not, then it cannot be murdered, much like a teddy bear can't be murdered. It can only be destroyed as property.In your scenario is the fetus inside his body?
If the definition of human life is fluid as needed to support your argument, then just say it.
Oh well. 20 years for this guy, huh? Sounds fairly reasonable.Very cute effort to exonerate him but he will be charged with homicide. Lots of precedentWhat is confusing about this? The guy poisoned his girlfriend. You want to compare it to abortion for whatever reason, but can’t because abortion is not the man’s decision.You are trying really hard BUT you are failing miserably.^ Man poisons woman, and this dumb Trump sheep says he didn’t do anything to her
Then charge him with poisoning his girlfriend not fetal homicide. You people can't explain the contradiction. Killing a fetus by ripping its limbs off in an abortion is okay because a fetus is not a person, has no rights, its just a lump of cells. If a father kills the fetus then its fetal homicide?
The OP challenged you to explain the contradiction, you failed.
Is 50% of the fetus growing inside the father? Oops.He got 20 years in prison for murder dumbass.He should be convicted, as there is precedent. AND HE POISONED THE WOMAN.Yet another fail lolWhat is confusing about this? The guy poisoned his girlfriend. You want to compare it to abortion for whatever reason, but can’t because abortion is not the man’s decision.
He is charged with the murder of an unborn baby.
Sit & spin bruh, its entertaining
Jesus fucking Christ.
You can't have it both ways. The fetus is either a child or it is not.
Since 50% of the fetus belongs to the father what's the difference if the mother or father kills the fetus? The left can't answer.
How to Stop LyingAnother example of convoluted conservative logic comparing apples to oranges.
It will be a big hit with his right wing brethren.
.
If the woman says so. In this case, she did not.Is 50% of the fetus growing inside the father? Oops.He got 20 years in prison for murder dumbass.He should be convicted, as there is precedent. AND HE POISONED THE WOMAN.Yet another fail lol
He is charged with the murder of an unborn baby.
Sit & spin bruh, its entertaining
Jesus fucking Christ.
You can't have it both ways. The fetus is either a child or it is not.
Since 50% of the fetus belongs to the father what's the difference if the mother or father kills the fetus? The left can't answer.
Its just a lump of cells.
Deflecting from the OP, classic.(B.) progressives insist that a fetus is not a human life?
Well there you go. You're working from a flawed premise. Anyone who say it's not human or alive is incorrect.
But then knowingly using a lie about your opponent position is a common tactic by all types of SJW isn't it?
So you've just abdicated your ability to think critically to the courts. What a good little serf you are.The courts have done that. I don’t need to explain anything.
If the woman says so. In this case, she did not.Is 50% of the fetus growing inside the father? Oops.He got 20 years in prison for murder dumbass.He should be convicted, as there is precedent. AND HE POISONED THE WOMAN.
Jesus fucking Christ.
You can't have it both ways. The fetus is either a child or it is not.
Since 50% of the fetus belongs to the father what's the difference if the mother or father kills the fetus? The left can't answer.
Its just a lump of cells.
I’ve answered previously in the thread. Your cute little arguments don’t change the reality.So you've just abdicated your ability to think critically to the courts. What a good little serf you are.The courts have done that. I don’t need to explain anything.
You should look up what irony means.If the woman says so. In this case, she did not.Is 50% of the fetus growing inside the father? Oops.He got 20 years in prison for murder dumbass.
You can't have it both ways. The fetus is either a child or it is not.
Since 50% of the fetus belongs to the father what's the difference if the mother or father kills the fetus? The left can't answer.
Its just a lump of cells.
LOL okay, now its only a lump of cells if a woman says so? The irony is off the charts.
Yep. You think it's the woman's decision to choose what happens to the fetus inside her body, no one else's. Which means you're still deferring your own opinion on the topic like a good little serf, and granting a woman the ability to determine not only the fate of the fetus inside her but also giving her the ability to determine if it's a life of not.I’ve answered previously in the thread. Your cute little arguments don’t change the reality.
You should look up what irony means.If the woman says so. In this case, she did not.Is 50% of the fetus growing inside the father? Oops.Since 50% of the fetus belongs to the father what's the difference if the mother or father kills the fetus? The left can't answer.
Its just a lump of cells.
LOL okay, now its only a lump of cells if a woman says so? The irony is off the charts.
Yes, I defer to the woman 100% of the time. You caught me.Yep. You think it's the woman's decision to choose what happens to the fetus inside her body, no one else's. Which means you're still deferring your own opinion on the topic like a good little serf, and granting a woman the ability to determine not only the fate of the fetus inside her but also giving her the ability to determine if it's a life of not.I’ve answered previously in the thread. Your cute little arguments don’t change the reality.
In this instance, the man who poisoned her and killed her baby: she decided that it was in fact a life because she wanted it. But she could have just as well determined that it's not a life because she didn't want it and therefore it's kind like like throwing away an old teddy bear. Or in other words, destroying one's own property.
Good to know where you stand.
Not only that, but you're saying that pregnant women get to decide what qualifies as life and what doesn't. How anti-science of you.Yes, I defer to the woman 100% of the time. You caught me.
Yeah, it’s her choice. I know you want to take that choice away, but it’s funny to see you argue in favor of the fetus poisoner.Not only that, but you're saying that pregnant women get to decide what qualifies as life and what doesn't. How anti-science of you.Yes, I defer to the woman 100% of the time. You caught me.
Not only that, but you're saying that pregnant women get to decide what qualifies as life and what doesn't. How anti-science of you.Yes, I defer to the woman 100% of the time. You caught me.
