Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To you it’s twisted in knots. It’s pretty clear to me.Not only that, but you're saying that pregnant women get to decide what qualifies as life and what doesn't. How anti-science of you.Yes, I defer to the woman 100% of the time. You caught me.
The left struggle to justify abortion, that's why the issue is twisted into knots with all sorts of contradictions.
Nancy Pelosi says everyone (except Republicans) has that God given spark.....*not including unborn babies*. But murderous MS-13 MOTHERFUCKERS are human beings, not animals.Homicide? Wait...homicide? How can killing a fetus legally be homicide when (A.) abortion is legal and (B.) progressives insist that a fetus is not a human life?
This is further proof that the left builds their positions on irrational emotion instead of logic and reason. Which creates a dreadful predicament for them. They have to contradict themselves.Imran was arrested last May and pleaded guilty to fetal homicide in March. On Friday was sentenced to 20 years in prison.
View attachment 194979
Doctor Slipped an Abortion Pill in Pregnant Girlfriend's Drink, Causing Her to Miscarry
It's not her choice, its biological factYeah, it’s her choice. I know you want to take that choice away, but it’s funny to see you argue in favor of the fetus poisoner.Not only that, but you're saying that pregnant women get to decide what qualifies as life and what doesn't. How anti-science of you.Yes, I defer to the woman 100% of the time. You caught me.
Who's arguing in favor of the poisoner? Pro-lifers would argue that he got what he deserves for killing a baby according to their consistent definition of what a "life" is. You're the one arguing that the definition of "life" is fluid depending on what the mother of said "life" wants, or thinks. You're saying that the mother has property rights over the fetus.Yeah, it’s her choice. I know you want to take that choice away, but it’s funny to see you argue in favor of the fetus poisoner.
Not according to the law.It's not her choice, its biological factYeah, it’s her choice. I know you want to take that choice away, but it’s funny to see you argue in favor of the fetus poisoner.Not only that, but you're saying that pregnant women get to decide what qualifies as life and what doesn't. How anti-science of you.Yes, I defer to the woman 100% of the time. You caught me.
To you it’s twisted in knots. It’s pretty clear to me.Not only that, but you're saying that pregnant women get to decide what qualifies as life and what doesn't. How anti-science of you.Yes, I defer to the woman 100% of the time. You caught me.
The left struggle to justify abortion, that's why the issue is twisted into knots with all sorts of contradictions.
You’ve spent the whole thread arguing the guy is innocent.Who's arguing in favor of the poisoner? Pro-lifers would argue that he got what he deserves for killing a baby according to their consistent definition of what a "life" is. You're the one arguing that the definition of "life" is fluid depending on what the mother of said "life" wants, or thinks. You're saying that the mother has property rights over the fetus.Yeah, it’s her choice. I know you want to take that choice away, but it’s funny to see you argue in favor of the fetus poisoner.
Quote where i said he was innocent.You’ve spent the whole thread arguing the guy is innocent.
No we don’t. She could have chosen not to press charges. It was her “choice.”Quote where i said he was innocent.You’ve spent the whole thread arguing the guy is innocent.
I'm arguing the point of the thread. Pro-choicers have an inconsistent view of what life is in order to justify their pro-choice stance.
Right. Her choice to determine whether her baby was in fact a life or not. And that's very anti-scientific.No we don’t. She could have chosen not to press charges. It was her “choice.”
What is confusing about this? The guy poisoned his girlfriend. You want to compare it to abortion for whatever reason, but can’t because abortion is not the man’s decision.You are trying really hard BUT you are failing miserably.^ Man poisons woman, and this dumb Trump sheep says he didn’t do anything to herNothing happened to the woman’s body. The FATHER decided to have a “safe and legal ABORTION” (which then forced you to result to a completely false narrative). How very progressive of you.A man made a decision about a woman’s body. Very conservative of him.
Then charge him with poisoning his girlfriend not fetal homicide. You people can't explain the contradiction. Killing a fetus by ripping its limbs off in an abortion is okay because a fetus is not a person, has no rights, its just a lump of cells. If a father kills the fetus then its fetal homicide?
OkayRight. Her choice to determine whether her baby was in fact a life or not. And that's very anti-scientific.No we don’t. She could have chosen not to press charges. It was her “choice.”
He got 20 years in prison for murder dumbass.He should be convicted, as there is precedent. AND HE POISONED THE WOMAN.Yet another fail lolWhat is confusing about this? The guy poisoned his girlfriend. You want to compare it to abortion for whatever reason, but can’t because abortion is not the man’s decision.You are trying really hard BUT you are failing miserably.^ Man poisons woman, and this dumb Trump sheep says he didn’t do anything to her
He is charged with the murder of an unborn baby.
Sit & spin bruh, its entertaining
Jesus fucking Christ.
You can't have it both ways. The fetus is either a child or it is not.
Black and white thinking would be that a fetus is a life. Period. No exceptions and no considerations.What is confusing about this? The guy poisoned his girlfriend. You want to compare it to abortion for whatever reason, but can’t because abortion is not the man’s decision.You are trying really hard BUT you are failing miserably.^ Man poisons woman, and this dumb Trump sheep says he didn’t do anything to herNothing happened to the woman’s body. The FATHER decided to have a “safe and legal ABORTION” (which then forced you to result to a completely false narrative). How very progressive of you.
Then charge him with poisoning his girlfriend not fetal homicide. You people can't explain the contradiction. Killing a fetus by ripping its limbs off in an abortion is okay because a fetus is not a person, has no rights, its just a lump of cells. If a father kills the fetus then its fetal homicide?
Blue, you are just WASTING YOUR TIME trying to reason with a hardcore Lefty like BF, they have serious mental disorder and see the whole world in terms of Black & White Reasoning. Look at the matter this way: Its only murder and homicide when its the father's idea to abort the fetus; had the mother done it herself, it would have been a constitutionally-protected right, just a piece of tissue, and the mother would be battling all the way to the Supreme Court for her right to abort the fetus.
BF doesn't give a flying crap that the fetus was aborted or that a life was lost, all he cares about is that it wasn't THE MOTHER'S DECISION.
Biology is one of the more black and white things. Is a fetus a life? Yes, biology says yes it is.Black and white thinking would be that a fetus is a life. Period. No exceptions and no considerations.
Even if we call it a life, it’s her choice to get it out from inside her body or not. Not a guy poisoning her drink.Biology is one of the more black and white things. Is a fetus a life? Yes, biology says yes it is.Black and white thinking would be that a fetus is a life. Period. No exceptions and no considerations.
Your position of "it's her choice no mater what" is very anti-scientific as a result. You're saying that in this instance, feelings and convenience is important enough to ignore science. That's fine if that's your position, but don't claim that your global warming opponents are "denying science." If you want to have any logical consistency, that is.
huh?You spin and twirl. To cause a fetus to die is a womans prerogative not a mans.Yet another fail lolWhat is confusing about this? The guy poisoned his girlfriend. You want to compare it to abortion for whatever reason, but can’t because abortion is not the man’s decision.You are trying really hard BUT you are failing miserably.^ Man poisons woman, and this dumb Trump sheep says he didn’t do anything to herNothing happened to the woman’s body. The FATHER decided to have a “safe and legal ABORTION” (which then forced you to result to a completely false narrative). How very progressive of you.
He is charged with the murder of an unborn baby.
Sit & spin bruh, its entertaining
So you're saying that the fetus is a life now but is her property, and she therefore has property rights over it. Just like how American slave owners had black people as property.Even if we call it a life, it’s her choice to get it out from inside her body or not. Not a guy poisoning her drink.
You guys love to invent things people said, when they never said them. Is a slave growing inside of and feeding off of a woman’s body? Is a slave the same as that?So you're saying that the fetus is a life now but is her property, and she therefore has property rights over it. Just like how American slave owners had black people as property. Cool.Even if we call it a life, it’s her choice to get it out from inside her body or not. Not a guy poisoning her drink.
Biology is one of the more black and white things. Is a fetus a life? Yes, biology says yes it is.Black and white thinking would be that a fetus is a life. Period. No exceptions and no considerations.
Your position of "it's her choice no mater what" is very anti-scientific as a result. You're saying that in this instance, feelings and convenience is important enough to ignore science. That's fine if that's your position, but don't claim that your global warming opponents are "denying science." ... if you want to have any logical consistency, that is.
