Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, dems segregate, exploit, and pander to every group, race, ethnicity, and color. They simply can't treat all americans as equal. They have to use different dialects and gimmicks for each group.
without the victim the dems have no-one but some old southern blue dogs who will not give up
The white male from the south is the only true minority left
Having the supreme court legeslate against the will of the people makes no sense to me
It's called a commitment to the U.S. Constitution. And that commitment is measured by applying those principles to everyone - even those you disagree with.
To imply that one segment of the political spectrum has benefited more than another is absurd. A commitment to free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution has protected the KKK and Black Panthers and every other group in between.
If you find yourself affiliated with a group that is consistently trying to deny Constitutional rights to groups, then I'd question your group - not the Constitution.
Whatever, guy.
Hey, I think I just saw a tranny go down the street. Time for you to panic.
Actually, dems segregate, exploit, and pander to every group, race, ethnicity, and color. They simply can't treat all americans as equal. They have to use different dialects and gimmicks for each group.
without the victim the dems have no-one but some old southern blue dogs who will not give up
The white male from the south is the only true minority leftHaving the supreme court legeslate against the will of the people makes no sense to me
without the victim the dems have no-one but some old southern blue dogs who will not give up
The white male from the south is the only true minority left
Having the supreme court legeslate against the will of the people makes no sense to me
It's called a commitment to the U.S. Constitution. And that commitment is measured by applying those principles to everyone - even those you disagree with.
To imply that one segment of the political spectrum has benefited more than another is absurd. A commitment to free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution has protected the KKK and Black Panthers and every other group in between.
If you find yourself affiliated with a group that is consistently trying to deny Constitutional rights to groups, then I'd question your group - not the Constitution.
The Judical branch is suppose to interpet
not legeslate, to make law
The people of California voted there will
there is nothing in constitution that mandates 2 men in love should be married by law and have the same rights that a man and woman has
Defense of marriage act is the will of the people
what does that have to do with the 1st amendment?
I think you mean "the Judicial Branch".
Grammar School Civics Fail!
to say that Gays should be happy with "legal unions" is like saying black folks should have been perfectly happy with this...
It dispenses water, right?
What does that have to do with the will of the People?
and your right, that was a stuipd mistake on my part
I think you mean "the Judicial Branch".
Grammar School Civics Fail!
to say that Gays should be happy with "legal unions" is like saying black folks should have been perfectly happy with this...
It dispenses water, right?
What does that have to do with the will of the People?
and your right, that was a stuipd mistake on my part
Slavery was OK under the "will of the people".
You're not very bright, are you?
without the victim the dems have no-one but some old southern blue dogs who will not give up
The white male from the south is the only true minority left
Having the supreme court legeslate against the will of the people makes no sense to me
It's called a commitment to the U.S. Constitution. And that commitment is measured by applying those principles to everyone - even those you disagree with.
To imply that one segment of the political spectrum has benefited more than another is absurd. A commitment to free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution has protected the KKK and Black Panthers and every other group in between.
If you find yourself affiliated with a group that is consistently trying to deny Constitutional rights to groups, then I'd question your group - not the Constitution.
The Judical branch is suppose to interpet
not legeslate, to make law
The people of California voted there will
there is nothing in constitution that mandates 2 men in love should be married by law and have the same rights that a man and woman has
Defense of marriage act is the will of the people
what does that have to do with the 1st amendment?
Some where in all of this I found my self whats left that is Wholesome?
Is there nothing left for a normal person can say its mine, leave it alone?
I mean I never owned a slave
I could care less if a black man or woman does well for themselves, if they earn it, good for them. They have every right to and have those rights protected by law now for 60 years. What is the problem?
You want the same benefits that straight people have? What was wrong with a legal union?
Illegal immigrants are breaking the laws of the land. Does it make me a bad person to want them arrested?
Why it is that everything that is normal makes some-one else feel as though there oppressed?
Is there something amiss with a man and woman being the only ones that can truly marry? By the grace of god two men cannot have a baby
Why is the left so jealous of everything? When is it that enough is enough?
Do we really need another protected class?
Does the will of the people mean nothing any-more
You people didn't seem to mind it when the Court struck down the City of Chicago's legislation banning handgun ownership.
Funny how that works, eh?
One day legislatures are the good guys and should rule, another day it's the Courts who should rule.
lol
Again the will of the people is ignored
any-way to win is the liberals motto
The state of California spoke clear and loud and through the legeslative branch told to shut up
I really mean this when I say our great nation as it was founded is gone for ever
I support a legal union to the extent that is really no different than a LLC
But to the left the ends justify the means
I think you mean "the Judicial Branch".
Grammar School Civics Fail!
to say that Gays should be happy with "legal unions" is like saying black folks should have been perfectly happy with this...
It dispenses water, right?
What does that have to do with the will of the People?
and your right, that was a stuipd mistake on my part
Joe likes to forget it was democrats that made those Jim Crow laws.
It was blacks who got their vote invalidated , libs are celebrating this
without the victim the dems have no-one but some old southern blue dogs who will not give up
The white male from the south is the only true minority left
Having the supreme court legeslate against the will of the people makes no sense to me
It's called a commitment to the U.S. Constitution. And that commitment is measured by applying those principles to everyone - even those you disagree with.
To imply that one segment of the political spectrum has benefited more than another is absurd. A commitment to free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution has protected the KKK and Black Panthers and every other group in between.
If you find yourself affiliated with a group that is consistently trying to deny Constitutional rights to groups, then I'd question your group - not the Constitution.
The Judical branch is suppose to interpet
not legeslate, to make law
The people of California voted there will
there is nothing in constitution that mandates 2 men in love should be married by law and have the same rights that a man and woman has
Defense of marriage act is the will of the people
what does that have to do with the 1st amendment?
Some where in all of this I found my self whats left that is Wholesome?
Is there nothing left for a normal person can say its mine, leave it alone?
I mean I never owned a slave
I could care less if a black man or woman does well for themselves, if they earn it, good for them. They have every right to and have those rights protected by law now for 60 years. What is the problem?
You want the same benefits that straight people have? What was wrong with a legal union?
Illegal immigrants are breaking the laws of the land. Does it make me a bad person to want them arrested?
Why it is that everything that is normal makes some-one else feel as though there oppressed?
Is there something amiss with a man and woman being the only ones that can truly marry? By the grace of god two men cannot have a baby
Why is the left so jealous of everything? When is it that enough is enough?
Do we really need another protected class?
Does the will of the people mean nothing any-more
What does that have to do with the will of the People?
and your right, that was a stuipd mistake on my part
Joe likes to forget it was democrats that made those Jim Crow laws.
It is true that those Conservatives who implemented those Jim Crow laws were Democrats.
Again the will of the people is ignored
The state of California spoke clear
