The Liberal NY Times lied about Hillary Clinton, because they hate her guts

[Bassman007]

New York Times admits they lied about Hillary Clinton - - - again - National/World News

Again people, this is the most liberal paper in the known world, and they hate the lie known as Hilary....

Great stuff.

 

[MACAULAY]

Thanks for this....Speaking of this Mills person, who was Mrs. Clinton's Chief of Staff as a federal employee while Mrs. Clinton was also a federal employee...both doing the People's Business...or at least they were both so sworn to do it.

Now, as to the Behngazi Commission, Mrs. Clinton is refusing to turn over communications between her and this Mills because it happens that Mills has a law degree. (You can't swing a dead cat in Washington without hitting a dozen lawyers...which of course is why it is the most corrupt city in the world.)

So, it turns out that, instead of doing the People's Business, like they were paid to do, they now employ the Attorney Client Privilege so they can keep from telling us what they were up to...its like Taking the Fifth.

And she would like to be President, and fully believes she is entitled to be so, because her husband was once President...I believe that bad bump she got on her head when she fell out (drunk?) a while back....it made her think she is like Evita Peron and this is Argentina.

You Democratic/Socialists are in a pickle....and America is laughing at you.

Its Uncle Joe or a disheveled Socialist. What will all you lazy dumb-asses do?

 

[mamooth]

Oh, only the craziest people think that the "WE WANT WAR IN IRAQ! PRESIDENT BUSH, LET US KNOW HOW WE CAN HELP!" New York Times is somehow "liberal".

The rather neocon aligned NYT has openly despised both of the Clintons for over 20 years. That's not news to anybody. Hence, they tell a lot of lies about the Clintons.

It does have the NYT and Hillary haters frustrated and panicked, the way that their smear campaigns aren't working. If the smears aren't working, what hope do they have?

 

[Bassman007]

Oh, only the craziest people think that the "WE WANT WAR IN IRAQ! PRESIDENT BUSH, LET US KNOW HOW WE CAN HELP!" New York Times is somehow "liberal".

The rather neocon aligned NYT has openly despised both of the Clintons for over 20 years. That's not news to anybody. Hence, they tell a lot of lies about the Clintons.

It does have the NYT and Hillary haters frustrated and panicked, the way that their smear campaigns aren't working. If the smears aren't working, what hope do they have?

Your attempt to hide this truth has failed

New York Times admits they lied about Hillary Clinton - - - again - National/World News

Again people, this is the most liberal paper in the known world, and they hate the lie known as Hilary....

Great stuff.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

New York Times admits they lied about Hillary Clinton - - - again - National/World News

Again people, this is the most liberal paper in the known world, and they hate the lie known as Hilary....

Great stuff.

Carlos Slim is working with Obama to destroy Hillary and make Biden the nominee

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Oh, only the craziest people think that the "WE WANT WAR IN IRAQ! PRESIDENT BUSH, LET US KNOW HOW WE CAN HELP!" New York Times is somehow "liberal".

The rather neocon aligned NYT has openly despised both of the Clintons for over 20 years. That's not news to anybody. Hence, they tell a lot of lies about the Clintons.

It does have the NYT and Hillary haters frustrated and panicked, the way that their smear campaigns aren't working. If the smears aren't working, what hope do they have?

LOL NYTimes NeoCon.

LOL

Fluffer gotta Fluff