Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Proof of what? That is it only the Left that jumps to conclusions about people's guilt?
Oops sorry, I keep forgetting to dumb down my post for you idiots. If I have to explain the two sentences I wrote, then you are more of an dumbass than your name suggest.
I don't think you can dumb things down, Secesh. There is nothing below bottom.
Oops sorry, I keep forgetting to dumb down my post for you idiots. If I have to explain the two sentences I wrote, then you are more of an dumbass than your name suggest.
I don't think you can dumb things down, Secesh. There is nothing below bottom.
You're probably right, I'd have to get my five year old grandson to explain it to you. You're also correct in that there is nothing below your level of intelligence. Oh by the way, your attempt at an insult is lame, I've never fought for the confederacy, but nice try.
Yep Sadam was our buddy before he joined OPEC. He suddenly became a terrorist, etc then.
What gives you the authority to speak for "nationalist"? How do you know what they care about or what principles they hold? Have you ever talked to anyone that claimed to be a nationalist? I think you're just making wild assumptions without anything to back it up. Prove me wrong!
You're too fucking stupid and dishonest for me to care what you think. Try reading up on Nationalism before accidentally confessing the depths of your ignorance.
In other words you got nothing. Just as I thought.
Yep Sadam was our buddy before he joined OPEC. He suddenly became a terrorist, etc then.
The US used Saddam as a balance to Iran. Bad move, but it was done.
When Saddam attacked Iran, used poison gas, and got bogged down in a bloody stalemate, big ho hum.
But when he succeeded in smashing Kuwait, then he was a threat.
Bush Sr did a good job getting a coalition to oust him. A real coalition - it included just about everyone.
Clinton dropped the ball, but hey the economy right?
No wait the economy was good because of tech, not Clinton.
Facts sure do suck don't they.
Yep Sadam was our buddy before he joined OPEC. He suddenly became a terrorist, etc then.
The US used Saddam as a balance to Iran. Bad move, but it was done.
When Saddam attacked Iran, used poison gas, and got bogged down in a bloody stalemate, big ho hum.
But when he succeeded in smashing Kuwait, then he was a threat.
Bush Sr did a good job getting a coalition to oust him. A real coalition - it included just about everyone.
Clinton dropped the ball, but hey the economy right?
No wait the economy was good because of tech, not Clinton.
Facts sure do suck don't they.
Especially when some are intentionally omitted.
Yep Sadam was our buddy before he joined OPEC. He suddenly became a terrorist, etc then.
The US used Saddam as a balance to Iran. Bad move, but it was done.
When Saddam attacked Iran, used poison gas, and got bogged down in a bloody stalemate, big ho hum.
But when he succeeded in smashing Kuwait, then he was a threat.
Bush Sr did a good job getting a coalition to oust him. A real coalition - it included just about everyone.
Clinton dropped the ball, but hey the economy right?
No wait the economy was good because of tech, not Clinton.
Facts sure do suck don't they.
You're too fucking stupid and dishonest for me to care what you think. Try reading up on Nationalism before accidentally confessing the depths of your ignorance.
In other words you got nothing. Just as I thought.
Free educational service:
"The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them."
George Orwell: Notes on Nationalism
In other words you got nothing. Just as I thought.
Free educational service:
"The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them."
George Orwell: Notes on Nationalism
A novelist is going to expalin to me what you're incapable of explaining? A novelist that's been dead for sixty years? You people are the dumbest fucks I've ever seen.
Your concession is duly noted.
In other words you got nothing. Just as I thought.
Free educational service:
"The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them."
George Orwell: Notes on Nationalism
A novelist is going to expalin to me what you're incapable of explaining? A novelist that's been dead for sixty years? You people are the dumbest fucks I've ever seen.
Your concession is duly noted.
Saddam was never used to balance iran. That's a talk radio wanna-sound-informed talking point and used to try and justify Rumsfeld sucking Saddam's dick.
Free educational service:
"The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them."
George Orwell: Notes on Nationalism
A novelist is going to expalin to me what you're incapable of explaining? A novelist that's been dead for sixty years? You people are the dumbest fucks I've ever seen.
Your concession is duly noted.
Orwell was not just a novelist, no more than Erich Maria Remarque, Stephen Crane and Dalton Trumbo were just novelists. Novels, as well as musical lyrics and other forms of artistic endeavor have been used for centuries to frame our world for us by creative thinkers.
Only the ignorant or the mentally challenged fail to understand the value of George Orwell's words to political discourse.
Saddam was never used to balance iran. That's a talk radio wanna-sound-informed talking point and used to try and justify Rumsfeld sucking Saddam's dick.
Check the timing. Before the collapse of the USSR everything was seen through the lens of superpower competition. After the overthrow of US backed tyrant Shah Pahlavi and the emergence of fire breathing radical clerics in Iran, the US wanted to balance what was seen as a threat to our hegemony in the region.
Learn a few facts next time.
A novelist is going to expalin to me what you're incapable of explaining? A novelist that's been dead for sixty years? You people are the dumbest fucks I've ever seen.
Your concession is duly noted.
Orwell was not just a novelist, no more than Erich Maria Remarque, Stephen Crane and Dalton Trumbo were just novelists. Novels, as well as musical lyrics and other forms of artistic endeavor have been used for centuries to frame our world for us by creative thinkers.
Only the ignorant or the mentally challenged fail to understand the value of George Orwell's words to political discourse.
So a novelist that's been dead for 60 years, is going to explain what idiot number one said about what he calls "nationalist" today? Makes sense.
You should have informed me you were an Islamofascist who saw EVERYTHING as a US attempt to exert imperialistic control over teh (sic) everpeaceful religion of Mohammed. I would not have wasted time trying to inform you, as your religion (or is that cult) dictates your beliefs.Backing saddam, like we backed iran, had the same goal: a doorway for physical US presence in the ME capable of direct control over energy.
Orwell was not just a novelist, no more than Erich Maria Remarque, Stephen Crane and Dalton Trumbo were just novelists. Novels, as well as musical lyrics and other forms of artistic endeavor have been used for centuries to frame our world for us by creative thinkers.
Only the ignorant or the mentally challenged fail to understand the value of George Orwell's words to political discourse.
So a novelist that's been dead for 60 years, is going to explain what idiot number one said about what he calls "nationalist" today? Makes sense.
I take it you advocate burning the New Testament because it's most prolific writer has been dead for over 2000 years. Is that true or is your time frame of dead authors only used when your superbly arrogant shadow has no other way to ignore information that nauseates your stupidity?
You should have informed me you were an Islamofascist who saw EVERYTHING as a US attempt to exert imperialistic control over teh (sic) everpeaceful religion of Mohammed. I would not have wasted time trying to inform you, as your religion (or is that cult) dictates your beliefs.Backing saddam, like we backed iran, had the same goal: a doorway for physical US presence in the ME capable of direct control over energy.
