The media ignored and still ignores Obama's lies

Kinda like stephanie trolls hero mass murderer Reagan should never have been Re-elected after all HIS LIES..:lmao:

Reagan lied about Iran-Contra, and Clinton lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, but at least there was honor to it. The affair was wrong, but a president standing up to so many people making such a big deal out of a simple affair could be seen as honorable IMHO. However if confirmed, what is honorable about a pack of lies?
No. Reagan acknowledged Iran/contra was a mistake but Clinton committed perjury over daliances and repeated mysogenistic sexual harassment allegations. Big difference. You bought the lefty media bs.

That would not change their intentions.
Whose intentions?
 
Kinda like stephanie trolls hero mass murderer Reagan should never have been Re-elected after all HIS LIES..:lmao:

Reagan lied about Iran-Contra, and Clinton lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, but at least there was honor to it. The affair was wrong, but a president standing up to so many people making such a big deal out of a simple affair could be seen as honorable IMHO. However if confirmed, what is honorable about a pack of lies?
No. Reagan acknowledged Iran/contra was a mistake but Clinton committed perjury over daliances and repeated mysogenistic sexual harassment allegations. Big difference. You bought the lefty media bs.

That would not change their intentions.
Whose intentions?

We were talking about Reagan and Clinton. Go back and read.
 
Kinda like stephanie trolls hero mass murderer Reagan should never have been Re-elected after all HIS LIES..:lmao:

Reagan lied about Iran-Contra, and Clinton lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, but at least there was honor to it. The affair was wrong, but a president standing up to so many people making such a big deal out of a simple affair could be seen as honorable IMHO. However if confirmed, what is honorable about a pack of lies?
No. Reagan acknowledged Iran/contra was a mistake but Clinton committed perjury over daliances and repeated mysogenistic sexual harassment allegations. Big difference. You bought the lefty media bs.

That would not change their intentions.
Whose intentions?

We were talking about Reagan and Clinton. Go back and read.
What's your point about intentions?
 
What's your point about intentions?

Nobody was doing anything to stop the communists in Nicaragua, but Reagan did. Without that help, Nicaragua could have become a communist nation. Maybe, maybe not.

Instead of making relations better, Obama puts us at odds with potentially communist Russia over Syria and the Ukraine.
 
Kinda like stephanie trolls hero mass murderer Reagan should never have been Re-elected after all HIS LIES..:lmao:

Reagan lied about Iran-Contra, and Clinton lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, but at least there was honor to it. The affair was wrong, but a president standing up to so many people making such a big deal out of a simple affair could be seen as honorable IMHO. However if confirmed, what is honorable about a pack of lies?
Nobody gave a shit about his stupid affair.

They gave a shit about whether or not he was sexually assaulting women, however. And he PERJURED himself when that issue was being investigated.
 
There's gotta be something in the Clinton' diet back in Little Rock that made them into congenital liars.
One is as bad as the other.
Anyway. The FBI is now doing a full scale criminal investigation into Hillary and her home brew server to see if the bitch was responsible for mishandling classified documents. If she didn't understand that sending and receiving State emails with details of NK's nuclear program was automatically classified whether the email had a 'stamp' on it does anyone in their right mind believe she is competent enough to be the President?
 

Forum List

Back
Top