QuickHitCurepon
Diamond Member
Something can still be done about Obama, but nothing can be done to change the past.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whose intentions?No. Reagan acknowledged Iran/contra was a mistake but Clinton committed perjury over daliances and repeated mysogenistic sexual harassment allegations. Big difference. You bought the lefty media bs.Kinda like stephanie trolls hero mass murderer Reagan should never have been Re-elected after all HIS LIES..
Reagan lied about Iran-Contra, and Clinton lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, but at least there was honor to it. The affair was wrong, but a president standing up to so many people making such a big deal out of a simple affair could be seen as honorable IMHO. However if confirmed, what is honorable about a pack of lies?
That would not change their intentions.
It was. He was impeached.If Clinton's perjury was so damning, why wasn't it pursued?
It was. He was impeached.If Clinton's perjury was so damning, why wasn't it pursued?
Whose intentions?No. Reagan acknowledged Iran/contra was a mistake but Clinton committed perjury over daliances and repeated mysogenistic sexual harassment allegations. Big difference. You bought the lefty media bs.Kinda like stephanie trolls hero mass murderer Reagan should never have been Re-elected after all HIS LIES..
Reagan lied about Iran-Contra, and Clinton lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, but at least there was honor to it. The affair was wrong, but a president standing up to so many people making such a big deal out of a simple affair could be seen as honorable IMHO. However if confirmed, what is honorable about a pack of lies?
That would not change their intentions.
What's your point about intentions?Whose intentions?No. Reagan acknowledged Iran/contra was a mistake but Clinton committed perjury over daliances and repeated mysogenistic sexual harassment allegations. Big difference. You bought the lefty media bs.Kinda like stephanie trolls hero mass murderer Reagan should never have been Re-elected after all HIS LIES..
Reagan lied about Iran-Contra, and Clinton lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, but at least there was honor to it. The affair was wrong, but a president standing up to so many people making such a big deal out of a simple affair could be seen as honorable IMHO. However if confirmed, what is honorable about a pack of lies?
That would not change their intentions.
We were talking about Reagan and Clinton. Go back and read.
I think repubs saw the potential lefty media backlash and that's why they applied only censure. Lefties began the misinformation campaign about 'lying about sex' to underplay and dismiss the infractions and set up a run for HR Haldeman Clinton.It was. He was impeached.If Clinton's perjury was so damning, why wasn't it pursued?
Wow, in word only.
What's your point about intentions?
Nobody gave a shit about his stupid affair.Kinda like stephanie trolls hero mass murderer Reagan should never have been Re-elected after all HIS LIES..
Reagan lied about Iran-Contra, and Clinton lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, but at least there was honor to it. The affair was wrong, but a president standing up to so many people making such a big deal out of a simple affair could be seen as honorable IMHO. However if confirmed, what is honorable about a pack of lies?
No, it means that Obama voters have no room to criticize anyone else's alleged dishonesty.Does this mean that it is ok for Carson to lie?