The Moment Sandy Hook Parents start cashing in their kids..

Secular Humanism sure seems to upset and threaten Keys.

Deceit FRAUDULENTLY advanced as a means of influencing the Ignorant: "Secular Humanism sure seems to upset and threaten Keys."

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance: The fundamental elements of socialism.

No keys, it was simply an observation. ...

The issue is not the observation, its the deceitful nature of implication, which was noted as being fraudulent and posed as it was, as a means to influence others who suffer similar levels of ignorance, as that which you suffer.

But your concession to that point is hereby duly noted and summarily accepted.

Feel better?
 
So scared you will go against the law. You are a criminal. I'm sure lots of people shooting in a dark crowded theater would have made the situation much better....

Once again you prove that you are a dumbass.

I don't know about the state he lives in but the one I live in (and most states) a sign or request by a business owner to not bring in a firearm does not have the force of law so he probably didn't break a law.

It depends on your state. In all however you are a toad if you ignore the sign.
Have you ever snuck food into a cinema? Then STFU.
 
The studies show they have no idea. From less than 800k to 3 million is not accurate at all. Could just as well be 100. They are just flawed surveys of what 5000 people for the largest ones. Only 200 criminals a year killed in defense. That is proof they are not happening in such large numbers.

Brain....I know you can't help yourself....have a nice Christmas....

You too! Hope Santa is good to you.
I'm sure he will be.....as long as I don't shoot him as a home invader.
 
Wry Catcher recommended licensing for gun owners. I remember that. I just don't remember your brilliant proposal for eliminating gun violence. So let's have it.

He thinks by imposing new laws, that criminals will follow them. Yes, criminals will follow the law. :eek-52: If only we had known it was so easy, just make a new law and BOOM! No more crime! :eusa_angel:
 
Wry Catcher recommended licensing for gun owners. I remember that. I just don't remember your brilliant proposal for eliminating gun violence. So let's have it.

He thinks by imposing new laws, that criminals will follow them. Yes, criminals will follow the law. :eek-52: If only we had known it was so easy, just make a new law and BOOM! No more crime! :eusa_angel:

There's no evidence that she's ever engaged in thinking of any kind, on anything.
 
Last edited:
The studies show they have no idea. From less than 800k to 3 million is not accurate at all. Could just as well be 100. They are just flawed surveys of what 5000 people for the largest ones. Only 200 criminals a year killed in defense. That is proof they are not happening in such large numbers.

Brain....I know you can't help yourself....have a nice Christmas....

You too! Hope Santa is good to you.
I'm sure he will be.....as long as I don't shoot him as a home invader.

You are far more likely to accidently shoot some innocent person than an actual criminal.
 
Of course you don't. You really have no idea what you are talking about and you just admitted it. Pathetic.

Well, why don't you tell us. That way, I can tear you apart . . . AGAIN.

It is in this thread. Go find it. Will slow your stupidity for a while.

No, I don't have the time to search the entire thread. Why don't you just state it clearly right now. Just what restrictions would you like to put on law-abiding citizens, and how exactly would it help anything? Explain your position, or you lose by default for not having a position, you dope.

You have had no idea what you are talking about yet you had time to post. You have time to search.
I didn't see it either and this is my thread. Maybe you can post it again since it seems to have been posted in full redacted form.

I'm not surprised you can't follow your own thread. Better go back and read.
 
The studies show they have no idea. From less than 800k to 3 million is not accurate at all. Could just as well be 100. They are just flawed surveys of what 5000 people for the largest ones. Only 200 criminals a year killed in defense. That is proof they are not happening in such large numbers.

Brain....I know you can't help yourself....have a nice Christmas....

You too! Hope Santa is good to you.
I'm sure he will be.....as long as I don't shoot him as a home invader.

You are far more likely to accidently shoot some innocent person than an actual criminal.
No. You are. I'm combat trained to know my weapon and know my target. You've already admitted you would be an incompetent retard with a gun. Don't project that on others.

And I hate to break it to you, but Santa Clause doesn't exist.
 
Well, why don't you tell us. That way, I can tear you apart . . . AGAIN.

It is in this thread. Go find it. Will slow your stupidity for a while.

No, I don't have the time to search the entire thread. Why don't you just state it clearly right now. Just what restrictions would you like to put on law-abiding citizens, and how exactly would it help anything? Explain your position, or you lose by default for not having a position, you dope.

You have had no idea what you are talking about yet you had time to post. You have time to search.
I didn't see it either and this is my thread. Maybe you can post it again since it seems to have been posted in full redacted form.

I'm not surprised you can't follow your own thread. Better go back and read.
I can't prove something that isn't there, Beevis.
 
The studies show they have no idea. From less than 800k to 3 million is not accurate at all. Could just as well be 100. They are just flawed surveys of what 5000 people for the largest ones. Only 200 criminals a year killed in defense. That is proof they are not happening in such large numbers.

Brain....I know you can't help yourself....have a nice Christmas....

You too! Hope Santa is good to you.
I'm sure he will be.....as long as I don't shoot him as a home invader.

You are far more likely to accidently shoot some innocent person than an actual criminal.
No. You are. I'm combat trained to know my weapon and know my target. You've already admitted you would be an incompetent retard with a gun. Don't project that on others.

And I hate to break it to you, but Santa Clause doesn't exist.

This guy is trained too.
Gun safety instructor accidentally shoots student - CNN.com
 
Brain....I know you can't help yourself....have a nice Christmas....

You too! Hope Santa is good to you.
I'm sure he will be.....as long as I don't shoot him as a home invader.

You are far more likely to accidently shoot some innocent person than an actual criminal.
No. You are. I'm combat trained to know my weapon and know my target. You've already admitted you would be an incompetent retard with a gun. Don't project that on others.

And I hate to break it to you, but Santa Clause doesn't exist.

This guy is trained too.
Gun safety instructor accidentally shoots student - CNN.com
Are you stupid enough to think this happens often? Firearms accidents are caused mostly by ignorance of guns and failure to follow basic safety rules. People like you do this. Not people like me.
 
You are far more likely to accidently shoot some innocent person than an actual criminal.

and with innocent people with guns stopping violent criminal attack and saving lives 1.6 million times a year...you are far more likely to stop a crime than you are to accidentally shoot someone with your gun....or even to kill a violent criminal.....
 
You too! Hope Santa is good to you.
I'm sure he will be.....as long as I don't shoot him as a home invader.

You are far more likely to accidently shoot some innocent person than an actual criminal.
No. You are. I'm combat trained to know my weapon and know my target. You've already admitted you would be an incompetent retard with a gun. Don't project that on others.

And I hate to break it to you, but Santa Clause doesn't exist.

This guy is trained too.
Gun safety instructor accidentally shoots student - CNN.com
Are you stupid enough to think this happens often? Firearms accidents are caused mostly by ignorance of guns and failure to follow basic safety rules. People like you do this. Not people like me.

I'm sure he said the same thing. So did the guy with the Uzi girl no doubt.
 
I'm sure he will be.....as long as I don't shoot him as a home invader.

You are far more likely to accidently shoot some innocent person than an actual criminal.
No. You are. I'm combat trained to know my weapon and know my target. You've already admitted you would be an incompetent retard with a gun. Don't project that on others.

And I hate to break it to you, but Santa Clause doesn't exist.

This guy is trained too.
Gun safety instructor accidentally shoots student - CNN.com
Are you stupid enough to think this happens often? Firearms accidents are caused mostly by ignorance of guns and failure to follow basic safety rules. People like you do this. Not people like me.

I'm sure he said the same thing. So did the guy with the Uzi girl no doubt.

So then, I expect the next time a child dies in a drowning in the pool due to a parent's negligence, you will demand that we ban swimming pools?
 
You are far more likely to accidently shoot some innocent person than an actual criminal.

and with innocent people with guns stopping violent criminal attack and saving lives 1.6 million times a year...you are far more likely to stop a crime than you are to accidentally shoot someone with your gun....or even to kill a violent criminal.....
I am. You are. I don't think she is. She already admitted to being accident prone with guns. She doesn't want to carry a gun and shouldn't carry one either. Sometimes the universe just works these things out.
 

Forum List

Back
Top