The next "military" rifle that will send the gunophobes into a tizzy.

It.s a 6.8 so it would make a nice hunting rifle, self-defense and what the 2nd Amendment was written for , defence against a tyrannical government. You know all those things your handlers tell you no one needs a firearm for.
Military gonna use Creedmoor? That's interesting!
 
No. We have a 38 pistol and guns used for deer and duck hunting. That's enough even for self defense.
Ok...you don't hunt anything in between?

No rabbits, squirrel, sheep, hogs?

And what if your deer rifle or .38 breaks...can you fix it?
 
Ok...you don't hunt anything in between?

No rabbits, squirrel, sheep, hogs?

And what if your deer rifle or .38 breaks...can you fix it?

Not anymore. We've had no interest in years. I really don't care about guns.
 
For what it is, it's a very nice weapon priced to fleece dollars. Only a few years ago the derivative MCX was $2200.00 and buyers stayed away. Now something very similar at twice the price sure is a stretch. You know that A fool and his money thing.

I don't understand why people invest in multiple guns.
 
For what it is, it's a very nice weapon priced to fleece dollars. Only a few years ago the derivative MCX was $2200.00 and buyers stayed away. Now something very similar at twice the price sure is a stretch. You know that A fool and his money thing.
Than why are you here talking about guns?

I asked a question about this particular gun. Just curiosity.
 
I was issued a 10 Lb M-14 when I went in the Army in 1966. Heavy ammo. I was glad when I exchanged it with a 6 lb M-16 with light ammo in Vietnam.

Seems like we are back where we started. Troops having to hump a heavy weapon.

Of course didn't have to worry about the enemy having body armor.
 

Forum List

Back
Top