Pop23
Gold Member
Marty, do you truly think that Insurance companies priced their insurance on the basis that ALL those on the plan will have baby birthing coverage? these are actuaries for goodness sakes and they don't take risks with their estimates....That is basically the whole concept in a nutshell.
I am certain they KNOW that women are 50% of the population or there abouts,and "x" amount of them are in birthing age etc, and have used these figures to estimate the cost of the coverage...same with those in the nation with preexisting conditions, they have estimated how many there will be based on the factual and actual numbers and trends they have before them to make these judgements....
AS WITH ALL coverage on any and all plans....it's how many will need "x operations" or how many will need "y medicines for diabetes" and they prorate the cost of these diseases or operations or whatever, over the full policy holders in the plan...
THIS IS HOW INSURANCE WORKS....Marty....all insurance.
Just as there are no women with Prostate cancer, and no men with vaginal or ovarian cancer, yet the man and or woman, still has that "coverage" on the family plan...
and also, in the case of 100% paid B/C coverage, some states had made it mandatory long before Obamacare and in the end, NO policy hike was needed in order to give this birth control coverage, because less women got pregnant and less women needed those type of services, so it all ended up being a wash....no increase in medical costs for b/c coverage on insurance.
Marty, do you truly think that Insurance companies priced their insurance on the basis that ALL those on the plan will have baby birthing coverage?
Sorry, but it is true the risk is spread to EVERYONE who buys a compliant plan.
Then to be fair. Car insurance should be mandatory for those that don't own cars. Then maybe the savings will allow me to afford buying health insurance for others?
Come on people