PixieStix
Platinum Member
- Apr 2, 2009
- 15,085
- 5,464
- 370
Do you think Obama will make a statement?
He needs to stay out of this. Whatever he says will only feed fires
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you think Obama will make a statement?
Many times.WoW!
I'm shocked, but not surprised.
"Zimmerman is TOAST!"
How many times did you type that out?
But, from a legal standpoint, I wonder why the prosecution never asked "If you were walking home, and a stranger with a gun confronted you and tried to stop you from going home, would YOU 'stand your ground' and fight back intensely?"
Afterall, a stranger with a gun DID confront Trayvon. Did Trayvon "Stand his ground" by responding with violent force?
If YOU were walking home, and a stranger with a gun confronted you, how would YOU respond?
Crazy case.
Crump just compared Trayvon Martin to Martin Luther King Jr. and Medger Evers.
Then called for calm.
Negged. Oh and reported.![]()
I reported you for frivolous reporting. So, whether or not you followed through with your nonsense, the mods are now aware of your abuse of the system.
So let me get this right...you reported me for something I may or may not have done because I am the one of frivolous reporting.
WOW! Do you even know what this sounds like?![]()
Short answer? *YES* Give it time he will say something stupid like 'They acted stupidly'...Mark my words...Now, will Obama go on TV and say something that enflames emotions and makes unnecessary strife?
The Martin family was not in court for the verdict.
They flew out of town.
They didn't want that racist egg on their face.
Lockejaw said:Martin had no other signs of injury from the scuffle besides the bullet wound
So what? If you were suddenly face to face with a man who appeared to be stalking you are you going to let him hit you first? And that bullet wound is problematical also. If Martin was on top of GZ as the defense would have us believe, GZ could not have got to his gun. According to the prosecution, Martin was attempting to get off GZ's whipped butt allowing GZ finally to grab his gun and fire. I do not necessarily agree with that scenario but it does make sense.
. Zimmerman passed two polygraphs at the police station. So I would say it is a very safe bet that Martin was the aggressor.
Er do you have a link? I also would love to know what questions were asked. Did the polygraph interview go something like this ?
Q. Did you shoot Travon Martin
A. yes
Ok, end of interview... you are free to go now! Good job son!
Martin as the aggressor? Is it not equally as feasible to see Martin as a person defending himself under the Florida SYG law? As the law stipulates Martin had no duty to retreat or continue to run from his "follower."
According to one of Zimmerman's 6 different versions of the confrontation, Martin asked him what his problem was. Zimmerman missed that opportunity to explain who he was and why he was following TM but instead he said:' "I don't have a problem." With an answer like that to ponder Martin obviously decided that he had better neutralize the threat as best he could....before that strange dude ( GZ) got him first!
Many times.WoW!
I'm shocked, but not surprised.
"Zimmerman is TOAST!"
How many times did you type that out?
I failed to realize how "conservative" that jury was. 2 of the jurors are gun owners.
They have to go back to face that "conservative" gun-owning, toting and supporting community.
In the end, it seems, they couldn't replace Trayvon with their child/ren.
Nothing will convince me that had the races been reversed that the killer WOULDN'T have been initially arrested.
You got the verdict you wanted...be happy.
The Martin family was not in court for the verdict.
They flew out of town.
Did they use their settlement to buy a funky little jet of their own??
![]()
I want my riots.
Second Amendment Marc...DEAL WITH IT asshole.Many times.WoW!
I'm shocked, but not surprised.
"Zimmerman is TOAST!"
How many times did you type that out?
I failed to realize how "conservative" that jury was. 2 of the jurors are gun owners.
They have to go back to face that "conservative" gun-owning, toting and supporting community.
In the end, it seems, they couldn't replace Trayvon with their child/ren.
Nothing will convince me that had the races been reversed that the killer WOULDN'T have been initially arrested.
You got the verdict you wanted...be happy.