Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No they didn't, and already proved they didn't.
And yes it is.
However long the term has been around, Zimmerman is not "white". He has African and indigenous American ancestry. He is about as "white" as Obama.
Yep, half white, more than he does African.
One does not know what race he listed as his race. I am guessing he marked white or other.
If the Times used the term before MSM how did they make up the term?
You also never proved they made up the term.
And if you check white as race and hispanic as ethnicity on the census. What would that make you?
No they didn't, and already proved they didn't.
And yes it is.
However long the term has been around, Zimmerman is not "white". He has African and indigenous American ancestry. He is about as "white" as Obama.
Yep, half white, more than he does African.
One does not know what race he listed as his race. I am guessing he marked white or other.
someone seems confused
someone is cornered on her lies but does not have the courage to admit it.
MSM in Ruben Navarette's own words invented the term - but Luissa will still deny the fact SHE lied they did not.
Then she lied about the term being on the official government documents.
And the police report was the first to list him as white
http://cnninsession.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/martinpolicreport.pdf
In actual fact, GZ might have wanted to be a cop.
Indeed, we also now see he wanted to be a prosecutor.
Can't wait for the prosecutor to piss on him for THAT.
But none of that makes TM's brushes with the law (or close brushes with entities akin to the law) relevant to the case. TM is not on trial, being dead.
Again, it would be relevant if he had some tendency towards violence AND IF GZ knew that trait at the time of their unfortunate contact with each other. Beyond that, it has nothing I can see that has anything to do with the trial.
GZ was the one who had a tendency toward violence. He beat up his wife and had an altercation with a cop, molested his cousin when he was little. He beat all of the charges, hopefully he doesn't get away with this. How's that for past history?
I'm sure you'll have some witty retort.
He beat up his wife? I'm sure you can support that claim.
And there WAS a CLAIM that when he was little he fiddled around with a young cousin, but I doubt you will support YOUR claim that it actually DID happen.
People "beat" charges when they aren't true. They certainly aren't proved which makes your assertions utterly baseless.
So, as far as past "histories" go, your empty claims are non starters.
When and if you can present an actual fact, that will be a refreshing first time for you in this discussion.
That's not a witticism. It's a sad truth.
someone seems confused
someone is cornered on her lies but does not have the courage to admit it.
MSM in Ruben Navarette's own words invented the term - but Luissa will still deny the fact SHE lied they did not.
Then she lied about the term being on the official government documents.
You are using a conservative columnist as proof?
CNN is a right-wing media in your description 
GZ was the one who had a tendency toward violence. He beat up his wife and had an altercation with a cop, molested his cousin when he was little. He beat all of the charges, hopefully he doesn't get away with this. How's that for past history?
I'm sure you'll have some witty retort.
He beat up his wife? I'm sure you can support that claim.
And there WAS a CLAIM that when he was little he fiddled around with a young cousin, but I doubt you will support YOUR claim that it actually DID happen.
People "beat" charges when they aren't true. They certainly aren't proved which makes your assertions utterly baseless.
So, as far as past "histories" go, your empty claims are non starters.
When and if you can present an actual fact, that will be a refreshing first time for you in this discussion.
That's not a witticism. It's a sad truth.
George Zimmerman?s relevant past
His cousin did a lot more than talk about the molestation. She also said he was very racist and always had been.
This judge has certainly given all the breaks to the prosecution and almost none to the defense. That has become increasingly obvious. Deliberate or due to bias? Who knows. But if appearances count for anything, then yes, she is favoring the Martin side, perhaps to protect herself from the predictable public reaction if there is an acquittal? Or I can also accept Ilar's take on it.
The Defense is not really that good. You all would like to think they are but West for instance will stand and object to something giving some rambling reason and not a law.
He rambles on a lot as a matter of fact. His opening went on and on, he asks things over and over. It isn't the fault of the witness if he can't form a direct question. O'Mara is just an asshole. If Zimmerman goes to jail, it's partially their fault.
No one has said gang ties, but it's apparent that he was cultivating a "gangsta" image. Or was the "Creepy white crackah" remark the way good kids refer to a white man?
Well, apparently the dad had a crip tat. Also, he (and Crump) publicly denounced support of the New BP's 10k hit and then they were standing right by him at a rally in photos when they were in town.
I don't know jack about that stuff, so I'm just passing it along with no strings attached. It is irrelevant to this or that.
Unless stuff comes out when Crump takes the stand.
Then we'll have a "real" conversation.
GZ was the one who had a tendency toward violence. He beat up his wife and had an altercation with a cop, molested his cousin when he was little. He beat all of the charges, hopefully he doesn't get away with this. How's that for past history?
I'm sure you'll have some witty retort.
He beat up his wife? I'm sure you can support that claim.
And there WAS a CLAIM that when he was little he fiddled around with a young cousin, but I doubt you will support YOUR claim that it actually DID happen.
People "beat" charges when they aren't true. They certainly aren't proved which makes your assertions utterly baseless.
So, as far as past "histories" go, your empty claims are non starters.
When and if you can present an actual fact, that will be a refreshing first time for you in this discussion.
That's not a witticism. It's a sad truth.
George Zimmerman?s relevant past
His cousin did a lot more than talk about the molestation. She also said he was very racist and always had been.
someone is cornered on her lies but does not have the courage to admit it.
MSM in Ruben Navarette's own words invented the term - but Luissa will still deny the fact SHE lied they did not.
Then she lied about the term being on the official government documents.
You are using a conservative columnist as proof?
Ruben Navarette from CNN is conservative columnist
Luissa, have some dignity and do not dig yourself into a deeper hole of lies
it goes to character and behaviors...if zimmerman can be cast as a 'wanna be cop', well?
In actual fact, GZ might have wanted to be a cop.
Indeed, we also now see he wanted to be a prosecutor.
Can't wait for the prosecutor to piss on him for THAT.
But none of that makes TM's brushes with the law (or close brushes with entities akin to the law) relevant to the case. TM is not on trial, being dead.
Again, it would be relevant if he had some tendency towards violence AND IF GZ knew that trait at the time of their unfortunate contact with each other. Beyond that, it has nothing I can see that has anything to do with the trial.
GZ was the one who had a tendency toward violence. He beat up his wife and had an altercation with a cop, molested his cousin when he was little. He beat all of the charges, hopefully he doesn't get away with this. How's that for past history?
I'm sure you'll have some witty retort.
He beat up his wife? I'm sure you can support that claim.
And there WAS a CLAIM that when he was little he fiddled around with a young cousin, but I doubt you will support YOUR claim that it actually DID happen.
People "beat" charges when they aren't true. They certainly aren't proved which makes your assertions utterly baseless.
So, as far as past "histories" go, your empty claims are non starters.
When and if you can present an actual fact, that will be a refreshing first time for you in this discussion.
That's not a witticism. It's a sad truth.
George Zimmerman?s relevant past
His cousin did a lot more than talk about the molestation. She also said he was very racist and always had been.
If he was 9 and she was 8, which I believe they were, it is a non issue. Kids that age check each other out on a regular basis.
He beat up his wife? I'm sure you can support that claim.
And there WAS a CLAIM that when he was little he fiddled around with a young cousin, but I doubt you will support YOUR claim that it actually DID happen.
People "beat" charges when they aren't true. They certainly aren't proved which makes your assertions utterly baseless.
So, as far as past "histories" go, your empty claims are non starters.
When and if you can present an actual fact, that will be a refreshing first time for you in this discussion.
That's not a witticism. It's a sad truth.
George Zimmerman?s relevant past
His cousin did a lot more than talk about the molestation. She also said he was very racist and always had been.
If he was 9 and she was 8, which I believe they were, it is a non issue. Kids that age check each other out on a regular basis.
You are using a conservative columnist as proof?
Ruben Navarette from CNN is conservative columnist
Luissa, have some dignity and do not dig yourself into a deeper hole of lies
You stated in his own words the media made up the term. Like I said...
You are using his words as proof.
He beat up his wife? I'm sure you can support that claim.
And there WAS a CLAIM that when he was little he fiddled around with a young cousin, but I doubt you will support YOUR claim that it actually DID happen.
People "beat" charges when they aren't true. They certainly aren't proved which makes your assertions utterly baseless.
So, as far as past "histories" go, your empty claims are non starters.
When and if you can present an actual fact, that will be a refreshing first time for you in this discussion.
That's not a witticism. It's a sad truth.
George Zimmerman?s relevant past
His cousin did a lot more than talk about the molestation. She also said he was very racist and always had been.
She said so; and to your thoroughly biased way of seeing things, THAT alone is enough to make it so.
Out of not so idle curiosity, WHAT IF she happens to be full of shit?
Show me some valid evidence and then demonstrate that it matters to what happened when TM was pounding GZ?
A truly low rent dick move by the "State."
I like that the prosecution has it in them. The Defense had Trayvon's Dad sent out of the courtroom for at least a day for some BS. They called a friend of GM's to the stand to testify that Tracy Martin cursed at him when GM's friend was simply holding the door for Martin.
Once he gets on the stand, he's saying uhm, it's what I heard, or I thought I heard that.
The Defense have been Dicks from the getgo.
You only think they've been dicks because the prosecution is getting their asses kicked.
