Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I never said there was a white hispanic race, I stated that is a racial category according to the government.
I also stated that white is a race and hispanic is an ethnic group about ten times now.
And FYI I don't ever follow MSM.
Do you watch Fox?
so why do you defend their lies?
Why do you lie about them making up the term?
http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdfThe U.S. Census
Bureau collects race and Hispanic
origin information following the
guidance of the U.S. Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
1997 Revisions to the Standards
for the Classification of Federal
Data on Race and Ethnicity.2 These
federal standards mandate that
race and Hispanic origin (ethnicity)
are separate and distinct conceptsand that when collecting these data
via self-identification, two different
questions must be used.
So the "graffiti" charge was because Trayvon wrote "WTF" on a locker? Lord people!
Where are the ties to an actual gang....surely the police after all of these thug like actions would have a gang tie or suspicion, right? Bloods, Crips, Best Friends...any ties to any Miami street gangs in the area? Anything? Thats what I want to see. Not that some kid wrote "wtf" on a locker, or some suspicious things in a backpack, or empty bag that contained weed. Give me something solid to confirm that he had gang ties of some sort.
And MSM isn't the only one saying he is white. Isn't the Daily Beast mostly conservative?
George Zimmerman, Hispanics, and the Messy Nature of American Identity - The Daily Beast
The case is also not about Trayvon Martin's prior brushes with the law or with the school officials.
If (only if) Trayvon had a history of violence tht GZ KNEW about at the time of the confrontation would TM's ALLEGED "past" matter.
He was a kid. He is dead. It is nothing less than a damn tragedy. And given the fact that his minor past has nothing to do with the case, it is kind of churlish and unseemly to keep bringing it up.
The case is about really just one major thing: when GZ shot TM, did GZ reasonably believe in that moment that he (GZ) was in danger in danger of dying or that he was in danger of suffering serious physical injury.
The case is also not about Trayvon Martin's prior brushes with the law or with the school officials.
If (only if) Trayvon had a history of violence tht GZ KNEW about at the time of the confrontation would TM's ALLEGED "past" matter.
He was a kid. He is dead. It is nothing less than a damn tragedy. And given the fact that his minor past has nothing to do with the case, it is kind of churlish and unseemly to keep bringing it up.
The case is about really just one major thing: when GZ shot TM, did GZ reasonably believe in that moment that he (GZ) was in danger in danger of dying or that he was in danger of suffering serious physical injury.
A horrid opening statement? You really think the jury will convict based on a knock knock joke that fell flat?You only think they've been dicks because the prosecution is getting their asses kicked.
No, they have had two horrid witnesses but the jury can figure things out. The Defense had a horrible opening statement, do you think it lost the case for them? I trust the jury to take all of it into consideration.
Actually, Bao did ok once the jury came back. We'll see. I'm hopeful.
Bao was a disaster and you KNOW the jury will interpret the long delay with something regarding his testimony.
I really see very few points scored for the prosecution. The defense managed to turn most into their own witnesses and explained what forensic evidence was presented in a way that bolsters their case. So far, the most compelling witness we've heard has been uncle Jorge, the Command Sergeant Major. You apparently have no idea what a CSM is, but what it means is he was one of a small group of the most elite non commissioned officers in the entire Army. That does not come without an unparalleled reputation.
And MSM isn't the only one saying he is white. Isn't the Daily Beast mostly conservative?
George Zimmerman, Hispanics, and the Messy Nature of American Identity - The Daily Beast
why do YOU lie in defense of the media?
so why do you defend their lies?
Why do you lie about them making up the term?
I do not lie - they made up the term - there is NO SUCH CATEGORY AS WHITE HISPANIC RACE - according to US government - the links to the rules of 2010 census prove that and it has been posted her by myself and other user.
Why do you lie in defense of MSM?
http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdfThe U.S. Census
Bureau collects race and Hispanic
origin information following the
guidance of the U.S. Office of
Management and Budgets (OMB)
1997 Revisions to the Standards
for the Classification of Federal
Data on Race and Ethnicity.2 These
federal standards mandate that
race and Hispanic origin (ethnicity)
are separate and distinct conceptsand that when collecting these data
via self-identification, two different
questions must be used.
The case is also not about Trayvon Martin's prior brushes with the law or with the school officials.
If (only if) Trayvon had a history of violence tht GZ KNEW about at the time of the confrontation would TM's ALLEGED "past" matter.
He was a kid. He is dead. It is nothing less than a damn tragedy. And given the fact that his minor past has nothing to do with the case, it is kind of churlish and unseemly to keep bringing it up.
The case is about really just one major thing: when GZ shot TM, did GZ reasonably believe in that moment that he (GZ) was in danger in danger of dying or that he was in danger of suffering serious physical injury.
The case is also not about Trayvon Martin's prior brushes with the law or with the school officials.
If (only if) Trayvon had a history of violence tht GZ KNEW about at the time of the confrontation would TM's ALLEGED "past" matter.
He was a kid. He is dead. It is nothing less than a damn tragedy. And given the fact that his minor past has nothing to do with the case, it is kind of churlish and unseemly to keep bringing it up.
The case is about really just one major thing: when GZ shot TM, did GZ reasonably believe in that moment that he (GZ) was in danger in danger of dying or that he was in danger of suffering serious physical injury.
it goes to character and behaviors...if zimmerman can be cast as a 'wanna be cop', well?
The case is also not about Trayvon Martin's prior brushes with the law or with the school officials.
If (only if) Trayvon had a history of violence tht GZ KNEW about at the time of the confrontation would TM's ALLEGED "past" matter.
He was a kid. He is dead. It is nothing less than a damn tragedy. And given the fact that his minor past has nothing to do with the case, it is kind of churlish and unseemly to keep bringing it up.
The case is about really just one major thing: when GZ shot TM, did GZ reasonably believe in that moment that he (GZ) was in danger in danger of dying or that he was in danger of suffering serious physical injury.
Who the hell posted this for you?
And MSM isn't the only one saying he is white. Isn't the Daily Beast mostly conservative?
George Zimmerman, Hispanics, and the Messy Nature of American Identity - The Daily Beast
why do YOU lie in defense of the media?
What am I lying about? Paulitcian claimed MSM made up the term, they did not. For one the Times used it before they did.
I find it funny you keep trying to lie and say I am defending the media. For one, usually it's the other way around. Lol
Second, all I am pointing out is Paulitcian lied when claiming they made up the term, which you also backed up. They did not make up the term. Please point out where I have defended them in any other way? Or were you lying?
Washington Post
why do YOU lie in defense of the media?
What am I lying about? Paulitcian claimed MSM made up the term, they did not. For one the Times used it before they did.
I find it funny you keep trying to lie and say I am defending the media. For one, usually it's the other way around. Lol
Second, all I am pointing out is Paulitcian lied when claiming they made up the term, which you also backed up. They did not make up the term. Please point out where I have defended them in any other way? Or were you lying?
Washington Post
They DID make up the term.
There is no such thing as white hispanic race and US government in it's official documents precisely said - those are TWO different things and two differnet questions in different sections are used to ask them.
You stated above that in your state applications there was such thing yourself - on the previous page - and that is a LIE.
I understand, you might have forgotten it was 2 different questions in 2 different sections - and that is exactly what MSM is counting on fabricationg the term which is a LIE.
So why are you defending their LIES?
And why do you continue to LIE here you are not defending them as you clearly ARE?
Why do you lie about them making up the term?
I do not lie - they made up the term - there is NO SUCH CATEGORY AS WHITE HISPANIC RACE - according to US government - the links to the rules of 2010 census prove that and it has been posted her by myself and other user.
Why do you lie in defense of MSM?
Show me how and when they made up the term? And that they were the first to use the term.
I will be waiting.
This judge has certainly given all the breaks to the prosecution and almost none to the defense. That has become increasingly obvious. Deliberate or due to bias? Who knows. But if appearances count for anything, then yes, she is favoring the Martin side, perhaps to protect herself from the predictable public reaction if there is an acquittal? Or I can also accept Ilar's take on it.
The Defense is not really that good. You all would like to think they are but West for instance will stand and object to something giving some rambling reason and not a law.
He rambles on a lot as a matter of fact. His opening went on and on, he asks things over and over. It isn't the fault of the witness if he can't form a direct question. O'Mara is just an asshole. If Zimmerman goes to jail, it's partially their fault.
I rather think you are either watching a different trial or you long ago gave up any objectivity whatsoever re this one. I have not only been watching the trial and, while I claim no expertise whatsoever in criminal law, I have spent a LOT of hours watching trials. And in my opinion, despite a shaky start that nobody thought smart, the defense has since done a great job. And the lawyer types who are also watching and commenting on the process also agree that the defense has done superbly.
Yeah, they screwed up a few minutes of the opening remarks, but ended them effectively. They kept Trayvon's mother on the stand too long. But otherwise, I haven't seen much to gig them on.
The prosecution, on the other hand, day after day seemed to be making the defense's case for them.
I do not lie - they made up the term - there is NO SUCH CATEGORY AS WHITE HISPANIC RACE - according to US government - the links to the rules of 2010 census prove that and it has been posted her by myself and other user.
Why do you lie in defense of MSM?
Show me how and when they made up the term? And that they were the first to use the term.
I will be waiting.
playing dumb now, when cornered?
there is no such thing as white hispanic race invented by MSM mixing ethnicity and race into RACE.
