dilloduck
Diamond Member
wrong thread rdean
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know that I would trust an animation not to sway the jury either way away from from what actually happened.Judge is back on the bar.
nutshell whats the issue
Admission of a piece of evidence. They cannot come to a conclusion on whether to have a Daubert, Pierce, or Richardson hearing on admissibility. The evidence is an animation depicting the altercation between Zimmerman and Martin. The man who crafted the animation has been told to stay for deposition, Dr. Shu(Schu, or Shoe)maker. Both sides wish to proffer the witness tomorrow.
Court is in recess until 8:30 am
Let us know when you and Natalie have rewritten the rules!![]()
Who's Natalie?
Why would I want the rules changed? Not my board. Not my rules.
I figured neg was disapproval and pos was approval. Now from reading the rules and the general view of it... Neggs are really just some petty way for petty people to goad petty folks into getting themselves banned. All and all it seems to be neggs are just petty.
Your mere disagreement of some vague term of some small unspecified portion of a small post where I'm proposing reasons to agree with you? lol
Anyhow, back to the thread. What does your disagreement with my post have to do with this OP, GZ's trial?
There are a lot of people who have a lot more rep than I do. You are seriously shitting me if you are insinuating that I nor they never get negged. We ALL do. So suck it up. I have been on forums that have rep and forums where the staff don't want to be bothered. The rep is fun. Perhaps you need to do a little reflection on how to get the fun out of it. It makes the forum, fiery and dynamic. So, IMO, if you don't like it you can go piss up a rope. When you and your confederacy of fools get the rep is shut down a lot of people will leave and no one will be left but you whiners.
![]()
See this picture? This is where Zimmerman said he kept his weapon. In a holster behind his back. He said Trayvon (who apparently has X-ray vision) reached for the gun. But then threw him to the ground and straddled him and started beating his face but he was able to reach behind his back (while he was laying on his back) inside of Trayvon's leg, take out the gun, release the safety and shoot the 17 year old in the chest with the gun at a perpendicular angle.
![]()
See what I mean. Remember, Zimmerman was supposedly keeping his weapon in a holster behind him.
![]()
All of this while his face was being beaten.
And Republicans say, "That sounds about right".
Why wasn't Zimmerman tested for drugs?
There is a police conspiracy behind this, imo.
because crump was excluded from sitting in the courtroom
I don't know that I would trust an animation not to sway the jury either way away from from what actually happened.nutshell whats the issue
Admission of a piece of evidence. They cannot come to a conclusion on whether to have a Daubert, Pierce, or Richardson hearing on admissibility. The evidence is an animation depicting the altercation between Zimmerman and Martin. The man who crafted the animation has been told to stay for deposition, Dr. Shu(Schu, or Shoe)maker. Both sides wish to proffer the witness tomorrow.
Court is in recess until 8:30 am
I'd be interested to see what the animator does with Martin when he is supposed to have disappeared into the darkness...and from where he reappears.
Unfortunately, I cannot watch tomorrow.
because crump was excluded from sitting in the courtroom
Because of the conspiracy theorists.
As an acquittal seams more and more likely...time to start thinking about the post trial excuses.
If Zimmerman is acquitted, list the talking point excuses that will be most vocalized by those invested in a guilty verdict...
A few are already out there.
The police took too long to arrest Zimmerman.
The police didn't collect enough evidence.
Zimmerman knew exactly what to say.
Add your own...
I don't know that I would trust an animation not to sway the jury either way away from from what actually happened.nutshell whats the issue
Admission of a piece of evidence. They cannot come to a conclusion on whether to have a Daubert, Pierce, or Richardson hearing on admissibility. The evidence is an animation depicting the altercation between Zimmerman and Martin. The man who crafted the animation has been told to stay for deposition, Dr. Shu(Schu, or Shoe)maker. Both sides wish to proffer the witness tomorrow.
Court is in recess until 8:30 am
I'd be interested to see what the animator does with Martin when he is supposed to have disappeared into the darkness...and from where he reappears.
Unfortunately, I cannot watch tomorrow.