Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zimmerman didn't pull his gun when he got sucker punched
Zimmerman didn't pull his gun when he was knocked down
Zimmerman didn't pull his gun when Martin sat on top of him
Zimmerman didn't pull his gun when Martin was pummeling him
Zimmerman didn't pull his gun when his head was being slammed into the concrete
Zimmerman didn't pull his gun when he screamed for help, "But none came"
Zimmerman didn't pull his gun when he saw someone turn and walk away
Zimmerman did pull his gun and shot Martin after he thought Martin was going for his gun.
This! You have to ask yourself why a person in possession of overwhelming force took the beating that he did. All of the physical and forensic evidence corroborates his story. There is no evil here. Two people had an encounter, one of them, Martin, went physical and the other defended himself, legally, with deadly force. It's tragic but had Martin not died, he would have been the criminal. He initiated the violence.
At any rate, I want this judge investigated for her conduct towards the defense. I mean come on.
Sadly, she isn't atypical of judges in the United States. I've been lucky to have pretty good judges to work with, but I've had to deal with judges who shouldn't be anywhere near the bench. One judge I know is the nicest guy off the bench, but when he gets up there he is absolutely crazy with his rulings.
'We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion." (D&C 121:39)
So basically, we throw judicial ethics out of the window?
Sadly, she isn't atypical of judges in the United States. I've been lucky to have pretty good judges to work with, but I've had to deal with judges who shouldn't be anywhere near the bench. One judge I know is the nicest guy off the bench, but when he gets up there he is absolutely crazy with his rulings.
'We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion." (D&C 121:39)
So basically, we throw judicial ethics out of the window?
Nope. Im all for judicial ethics. Im just stating that it's alot more widespread than you might realize.
-- words of Andrew Branca found at Getting to Murder 2: Finding George Zimmerman?s ?Depraved Mind?Florida defines murder in the second degree as:
The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated by any act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life, although without any premeditated design to effect the death of any particular individual, is murder in the second degree . . .
Floridas standard jury instruction for murder 2 notes that:
An act is imminently dangerous to another and demonstrating a depraved mind if it is an act or series of acts that:
a person of ordinary judgment would know is reasonably certain to kill or do serious bodily injury to another, and
is done from ill will, hatred, spite, or an evil intent, and
is of such a nature that the act itself indicates an indifference to human life.
Then look at "manslaughter." Law of Self Defense ? FL 782.07 Manslaughter
"Culpable negligence." That's the key element of "manslaughter."
It's a really BIG problem for the prosecution because if the jury agrees that the intentional acts of pulling out the gun and firing it at the person (TM) was "justified," then it is NOT "negligence" of any stripe or flavor.
Judge Nelson whittled down manslaughter even further this morning. An instruction for voluntary manslaughter (by act) will be given, but not for involuntary (culpable negligence). I'm aware you know the distinction; I just put the proceeding in parentheses to clarify for others.
] and had missed that decision by the judge.
Stalking is never charged when there's someone arrested for murder. Stalking is something that would be charged by itself when there's no killing.
I'll admit that saying he was stalking is a little bit of a stretch, but since no one has come up with a better word to describe it, I use it. He was ALMOST stalking, so close to it as to be indecipherable. Well you get the idea.
It was almost stalking. It was kind of like stalking. I can call it stalking if I want to and you can't stop me, nyah nyah.
You're a psycho knob muffin.
I'm a psycho because I never fully agreed it was pure stalking?
That shows I have values.
I use the word "stalking" because like many who believe GZ is guilty, I'm sure, use it because it's expedient to do so and just merely to say he followed is terribly lacking. He followed with a gun, which is begging for a disaster, like just what happened. Furthermore, he knew very well that there was a very high chance of a confrontation to occur, when he followed someone. You'd have to be a moron to think there wouldn't be.
BTW Muffin is the name of my dog. Don't abuse it faggot.
The foam rubber doll is in the courtroom.
lie counter for state's closing at 2 already
Nuhuh! AL just wishes it was part of Pensacola.
testarosa said:Here comes the other homey
I don't care if it's in Alabama, Florida, or Montana...I want some Old Bay Steamer in Ft. Walton right now because of you all!
I don't care if it's in Alabama, Florida, or Montana...I want some Old Bay Steamer in Ft. Walton right now because of y'all
There I fixed it.
All the rednecks live in Florida that's we're having this trial don't all y'all know?
So basically, we throw judicial ethics out of the window?
Nope. Im all for judicial ethics. Im just stating that it's alot more widespread than you might realize.
Is there a reason why nobody is doing anything about it?
Except he wasnt stalking Trayvon. There is a reason stalking wasn't charged. There is absolutely zero evidence to support a stalking charge.
Stalking is never charged when there's someone arrested for murder. Stalking is something that would be charged by itself when there's no killing.
I'll admit that saying he was stalking is a little bit of a stretch, but since no one has come up with a better word to describe it, I use it. He was ALMOST stalking, so close to it as to be indecipherable. Well you get the idea.
To be stalking, the activity would have to be done repeatedly. That's why Zimmerman was not charged with stalking.
Is Bernie's entire closing going to be a 3 hour long appeal to emotion??
Is Bernie's entire closing going to be a 3 hour long appeal to emotion??
With a splattering of "ASSHOLE" and "FUCKING PUNK"
Just like his whole case, ya know.
