And by making your response personal, you lost any credibility you may have thought you had.
Except that I didn't make it personal, I made it about the veracity of your source.
Obfuscating is not going to help you make whatever point you thought you were making, particularly when you made no point, and certainly didn't support your claim with anything resembling evidence. You asked for evidence. I provided a link to lots of evidence. It was obvious that you didn't even bother to browse the site, otherwise you would have made an attempt to prove your point by debunking just one item listed there. You didn't do that. You simply made a biased assessment based on your own political beliefs. And by the way, my penis has nothing to do with it. Does yours?
Yet the burden of proof is still on the AGW cult that can not provide one link to datasets with source code that proves CO2 controls climate.