Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
Probably best that this legal aspect is discussed here relevant to the "Mistaking Behaviors for Race" focus instead of who is sitting in jail right now...
Did you expect there would be no civil disobedience? Are you in support of the people who married gays in California anyway while Prop 8 was law (still is when they impeach Ginsburg & Kagan and retry the case)? If you were in support of that, you are in support also of Kim Davis' refusal on principle. You have your principles, she has hers. Only, she's sitting in jail because of hers. But that's better than eternity in the slammer.
If she loses her job because of her passive but firm religious objections, she is going to FLEECE the state of Kentucky. That's a given. Anyone wishing to retire early might choose to do exactly what she's doing, matter of fact.. In order for the jury to find against Ms. Davis they would have to find that the 1st Amendment no longer is a working amendment and that a person can be discriminated against based on their religion.
See, I told y'all that mistaking behaviors for race was going to cause a legal logjam and unraveling of American Law . But NOOOOOObody wanted to listen. Now we are right in the thick of it, what, not even four months after June's Judicial coup?
Behaviors are what Christains cannot promote. The Anne Heches of this waffling cult whose only binding trait seems to be utter rejection of the missionary position between heterosexuals, cannot demand that Christians abdicate their faith to accomodate the new rainbow religion.
Repeat after me:
"Homosexuality is NOT a race"..."Homosexuality is NOT a race"...."Homosexuality is NOT a race"...ladies and gentlemen of the jury, your turn "Homosexuality is NOT a race"...judges, your turn "Homosexuality is NOT a race"...now Congress, "Homosexuality is NOT race"... State attorneys general, now you: "Homosexuality is NOT a race"..
HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT A RACE. The mistaken premise is already tearing away at the Constitution. Loosely knit, temporally-shifting organized deviant sex behaviors were NEVER given Constitutional protection. Behaviors are regulated locally at the state level.
I love the cheeky judge who refused to divorce those two people because he said that since his state cannot define what marriage is, then they are also too ignorant to define what marriage isn't. He's leaving that divorce up to the US Supreme Court...lol.. Go judge! Drive that unravelling constitutional issue over the home plate. Tenn. judge refuses Straight Couple's divorce because of Gay Marriage | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
I don't think she will. The longer she stays in that jail, the more the jury will award her when this is all said and done.There is no reason to hold her once she no longer holds the office, so she won't be. When her term is up, she's out, if she doesn't fold before then, which she will...
Did you expect there would be no civil disobedience? Are you in support of the people who married gays in California anyway while Prop 8 was law (still is when they impeach Ginsburg & Kagan and retry the case)? If you were in support of that, you are in support also of Kim Davis' refusal on principle. You have your principles, she has hers. Only, she's sitting in jail because of hers. But that's better than eternity in the slammer.
If she loses her job because of her passive but firm religious objections, she is going to FLEECE the state of Kentucky. That's a given. Anyone wishing to retire early might choose to do exactly what she's doing, matter of fact.. In order for the jury to find against Ms. Davis they would have to find that the 1st Amendment no longer is a working amendment and that a person can be discriminated against based on their religion.
See, I told y'all that mistaking behaviors for race was going to cause a legal logjam and unraveling of American Law . But NOOOOOObody wanted to listen. Now we are right in the thick of it, what, not even four months after June's Judicial coup?
Behaviors are what Christains cannot promote. The Anne Heches of this waffling cult whose only binding trait seems to be utter rejection of the missionary position between heterosexuals, cannot demand that Christians abdicate their faith to accomodate the new rainbow religion.
Repeat after me:
"Homosexuality is NOT a race"..."Homosexuality is NOT a race"...."Homosexuality is NOT a race"...ladies and gentlemen of the jury, your turn "Homosexuality is NOT a race"...judges, your turn "Homosexuality is NOT a race"...now Congress, "Homosexuality is NOT race"... State attorneys general, now you: "Homosexuality is NOT a race"..
HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT A RACE. The mistaken premise is already tearing away at the Constitution. Loosely knit, temporally-shifting organized deviant sex behaviors were NEVER given Constitutional protection. Behaviors are regulated locally at the state level.
I love the cheeky judge who refused to divorce those two people because he said that since his state cannot define what marriage is, then they are also too ignorant to define what marriage isn't. He's leaving that divorce up to the US Supreme Court...lol.. Go judge! Drive that unravelling constitutional issue over the home plate. Tenn. judge refuses Straight Couple's divorce because of Gay Marriage | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Last edited: