Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In an undercover sting operation, a woman who was 23-plus weeks pregnant (abortion is illegal in New York and other states after 24 weeks) secretly recorded the conversations she had in this abortionists office.
In an exchange laden with euphemisms on both sides to conceal the gruesome nature of the discussion, the pregnant woman wondered aloud what would happen if it (her fetus) emerged from her intact and alive.
The employee assigned to take note of medical history reassured the woman, We never had that for ages (a seeming admission that a baby did survive abortion at the clinic at least once) but that should it survive this, They would still have to put it in like a jar, a container, with solution, and send it to the lab. . . . We dont just throw it out in the garbage.
Oh, and this innocuous-sounding solution was, of course, a toxic substance suitable for killing an infant.
Like, what if it was twitching? asked the pregnant woman.
The solution will make it stop, said the clinic employee. Thats the whole purpose of the solution . . . It will automatically stop. It wont be able to breathe anymore.
IF this bullshit by Lila Rose is actually true, then that shouldn't be allowed. If it is born alive, it is a person, protected by law, and they must try and save its life - although I would imagine that this depends on how far along the woman is in her pregnancy.
Intentionally stopping a heartbeat is murder right?
I wonder why late term abortions are necessary in a state that not only allows abortions, but actually pays for them through Medicaid. I am sure the usual suspects will pop in and try to blame this on the pro life crowd, but it only makes sense if you ignore reality.
In an undercover sting operation, a woman who was 23-plus weeks pregnant (abortion is illegal in New York and other states after 24 weeks) secretly recorded the conversations she had in this abortionists office.
In an exchange laden with euphemisms on both sides to conceal the gruesome nature of the discussion, the pregnant woman wondered aloud what would happen if it (her fetus) emerged from her intact and alive.
The employee assigned to take note of medical history reassured the woman, We never had that for ages (a seeming admission that a baby did survive abortion at the clinic at least once) but that should it survive this, They would still have to put it in like a jar, a container, with solution, and send it to the lab. . . . We dont just throw it out in the garbage.
Oh, and this innocuous-sounding solution was, of course, a toxic substance suitable for killing an infant.
Like, what if it was twitching? asked the pregnant woman.
The solution will make it stop, said the clinic employee. Thats the whole purpose of the solution . . . It will automatically stop. It wont be able to breathe anymore.
IF this bullshit by Lila Rose is actually true, then that shouldn't be allowed. If it is born alive, it is a person, protected by law, and they must try and save its life - although I would imagine that this depends on how far along the woman is in her pregnancy.
IF this bullshit by Lila Rose is actually true, then that shouldn't be allowed. If it is born alive, it is a person, protected by law, and they must try and save its life - although I would imagine that this depends on how far along the woman is in her pregnancy.
IF this bullshit by Lila Rose is actually true, then that shouldn't be allowed. If it is born alive, it is a person, protected by law, and they must try and save its life - although I would imagine that this depends on how far along the woman is in her pregnancy.
Yes, under current law it does depend.
But how do you personally differentiate between "born alive" and "in vitro alive"?
IF this bullshit by Lila Rose is actually true, then that shouldn't be allowed. If it is born alive, it is a person, protected by law, and they must try and save its life - although I would imagine that this depends on how far along the woman is in her pregnancy.
It doesn't matter if it happens in a hospital, even if the mother doesn't want the child.
IF this bullshit by Lila Rose is actually true, then that shouldn't be allowed. If it is born alive, it is a person, protected by law, and they must try and save its life - although I would imagine that this depends on how far along the woman is in her pregnancy.
Intentionally stopping a heartbeat is murder right?
IF this bullshit by Lila Rose is actually true, then that shouldn't be allowed. If it is born alive, it is a person, protected by law, and they must try and save its life - although I would imagine that this depends on how far along the woman is in her pregnancy.
Yes, under current law it does depend.
But how do you personally differentiate between "born alive" and "in vitro alive"?
Intentionally stopping a heartbeat is murder right?
Nope. Because then the death penalty would be considered murder, and removing a person from life support would also be murder.
IF this bullshit by Lila Rose is actually true, then that shouldn't be allowed. If it is born alive, it is a person, protected by law, and they must try and save its life - although I would imagine that this depends on how far along the woman is in her pregnancy.
Yes, under current law it does depend.
But how do you personally differentiate between "born alive" and "in vitro alive"?
In vitro alive? There is a difference between an embryo and a newborn baby...I am not sure if this is what you mean??
