Papageorgio
The Ultimate Winner
- May 18, 2010
- 61,514
- 18,689
Well, how could I possibly argue against something that you simply "know". Too funny.Lol! You are funny.Good point but there is a reasonable explanation for why it was done that had to do with Military codes unrelated to Obama.The DOD that has Obama as the Commander and Chief? Lol! Now you are being silly.
Terror act or workplace violence? Hasan trial raises sensitive issue
So, victims and others are demanding, why is the November 2009 attack at Fort Hood being tried as a case of workplace violence and not as an act of terror?
Military law expert Scott L. Silliman says the answer is simple - because the Uniform Code of Military Justice does not have a punitive article for "terrorism."
"They really didn't have an option," says Silliman, director emeritus of Duke University's Center on Law, Ethics and National Security in Durham, N.C. "He was an active-duty officer. The crime occurred on a military installation. … It was obvious he was going to face a court-martial."
You go with that. We all know the real reason. And remember Benghazi? That was over a book? Lol!
I thought Benghazi would shut the nutter up.