Hillary Clinton's self- hating Jews are racist as well..
David Brock penned memo on impeaching Clarence Thomas
Are these the same "racist" Jews who supported Obama twice?
too many are regretting it now that he sold out Israel to the islamonzis
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hillary Clinton's self- hating Jews are racist as well..
David Brock penned memo on impeaching Clarence Thomas
Are these the same "racist" Jews who supported Obama twice?
The thought of any black or other minority conservative in a position of national prominence scares the living shit out of liberals.I think the problem for many Democrats is that Ben Carson might be a competent black president.
A, It destroys their narrative that all conservatives are racist. B. it exposes their narrative that the GOP is for whites only as a lie.
Examples?...Easy. Clarence Thomas is the first modern day black person to suffer the attacks of liberals. They put up this incredible Anita Hill to testify against Thomas. She told stories of "pubic hairs on coke cans".....Her stories were just not believable.
When Condi Rice was Secy of State, left wing political cartoonists drew her caricature to make her look like Aunt Jemima. Totally racist. It was excused as " freedom of expression by the press"
The libs destroyed Herman Cain. There is no doubt that as the campaign progresses, the libs will be thinking of ways to attack Dr Carson.
no. it doesn't "scare" anyone. it's just bigots always had their house.... blacks who said whatever the masters wanted. you know, like clarence thomas going through school because of affirmative action then trying to take it away form everyone after him.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master".
clarence thomas is a disgrace to the bench and had no business being given thurgood marshall's seat. there is nothing "racist" about it.
apparently comparison confuses you.
Racist comment..RejectedThe thought of any black or other minority conservative in a position of national prominence scares the living shit out of liberals.I think the problem for many Democrats is that Ben Carson might be a competent black president.
A, It destroys their narrative that all conservatives are racist. B. it exposes their narrative that the GOP is for whites only as a lie.
Examples?...Easy. Clarence Thomas is the first modern day black person to suffer the attacks of liberals. They put up this incredible Anita Hill to testify against Thomas. She told stories of "pubic hairs on coke cans".....Her stories were just not believable.
When Condi Rice was Secy of State, left wing political cartoonists drew her caricature to make her look like Aunt Jemima. Totally racist. It was excused as " freedom of expression by the press"
The libs destroyed Herman Cain. There is no doubt that as the campaign progresses, the libs will be thinking of ways to attack Dr Carson.
no. it doesn't "scare" anyone. it's just bigots always had their house.... blacks who said whatever the masters wanted. you know, like clarence thomas going through school because of affirmative action then trying to take it away form everyone after him.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master".
A court jester is not a powerful person. Thomas doesn't even seem to have his own opinion about anything. He is truly the stereotypical Negro and is being led around by Scalia like a house boy . He is a Corn-servative though, just SHUCKING his way through his life appointment without a kernel of ambition and forsaking the Black people and the AA that got him there.
The thought of any black or other minority conservative in a position of national prominence scares the living shit out of liberals.I think the problem for many Democrats is that Ben Carson might be a competent black president.
A, It destroys their narrative that all conservatives are racist. B. it exposes their narrative that the GOP is for whites only as a lie.
Examples?...Easy. Clarence Thomas is the first modern day black person to suffer the attacks of liberals. They put up this incredible Anita Hill to testify against Thomas. She told stories of "pubic hairs on coke cans".....Her stories were just not believable.
When Condi Rice was Secy of State, left wing political cartoonists drew her caricature to make her look like Aunt Jemima. Totally racist. It was excused as " freedom of expression by the press"
The libs destroyed Herman Cain. There is no doubt that as the campaign progresses, the libs will be thinking of ways to attack Dr Carson.
no. it doesn't "scare" anyone. it's just bigots always had their house.... blacks who said whatever the masters wanted. you know, like clarence thomas going through school because of affirmative action then trying to take it away form everyone after him.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master".
clarence thomas is a disgrace to the bench and had no business being given thurgood marshall's seat. there is nothing "racist" about it.
apparently comparison confuses you.
It seems that every black that doesn't dance to democrats music is disgrace. Marshall was appointed by that racist Johnson, right? How we dare to put black in that seat...
Oh, btw, once Marshall was gone, it's not his seat anymore.
More racist rhetoric..Your programmed redundancy doesn't make what you state true!The thought of any black or other minority conservative in a position of national prominence scares the living shit out of liberals.
A, It destroys their narrative that all conservatives are racist. B. it exposes their narrative that the GOP is for whites only as a lie.
Examples?...Easy. Clarence Thomas is the first modern day black person to suffer the attacks of liberals. They put up this incredible Anita Hill to testify against Thomas. She told stories of "pubic hairs on coke cans".....Her stories were just not believable.
When Condi Rice was Secy of State, left wing political cartoonists drew her caricature to make her look like Aunt Jemima. Totally racist. It was excused as " freedom of expression by the press"
The libs destroyed Herman Cain. There is no doubt that as the campaign progresses, the libs will be thinking of ways to attack Dr Carson.
no. it doesn't "scare" anyone. it's just bigots always had their house.... blacks who said whatever the masters wanted. you know, like clarence thomas going through school because of affirmative action then trying to take it away form everyone after him.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master".
A court jester is not a powerful person. Thomas doesn't even seem to have his own opinion about anything. He is truly the stereotypical Negro and is being led around by Scalia like a house boy . He is a Corn-servative though, just SHUCKING his way through his life appointment without a kernel of ambition and forsaking the Black people and the AA that got him there.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master"
Further, that which is racist is in the eye of the beholder. I don't believe in race but I did use the word "Negro" to make a point. Besides , I could (ugh) look just like Thomas for all you know since I have never revealed my race...I could also be of the highly touted pink race!
And now you libs are making excuses for being racist. Ahh, the old double standard.....You are racist. That's final.The thought of any black or other minority conservative in a position of national prominence scares the living shit out of liberals.I think the problem for many Democrats is that Ben Carson might be a competent black president.
A, It destroys their narrative that all conservatives are racist. B. it exposes their narrative that the GOP is for whites only as a lie.
Examples?...Easy. Clarence Thomas is the first modern day black person to suffer the attacks of liberals. They put up this incredible Anita Hill to testify against Thomas. She told stories of "pubic hairs on coke cans".....Her stories were just not believable.
When Condi Rice was Secy of State, left wing political cartoonists drew her caricature to make her look like Aunt Jemima. Totally racist. It was excused as " freedom of expression by the press"
The libs destroyed Herman Cain. There is no doubt that as the campaign progresses, the libs will be thinking of ways to attack Dr Carson.
no. it doesn't "scare" anyone. it's just bigots always had their house.... blacks who said whatever the masters wanted. you know, like clarence thomas going through school because of affirmative action then trying to take it away form everyone after him.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master".
clarence thomas is a disgrace to the bench and had no business being given thurgood marshall's seat. there is nothing "racist" about it.
apparently comparison confuses you.
Denial is not a valid defense.Ben Carson would be an awesome President.
If you disagree then you are a racist.
![]()
What's the matter Jill, this has been the mantra of the left ever since Obama came onto the scene.
no. it hasn't. but it's what the rightwingnut likes to say.![]()
34. Senators 34 traitors are joining Obama and giving Iran the nuke. We might as well build the fucking bomb for them.Hillary Clinton's self- hating Jews are racist as well..
David Brock penned memo on impeaching Clarence Thomas
Are these the same "racist" Jews who supported Obama twice?
too many are regretting it now that he sold out Israel to the islamonzis
Actually, he has done a remarkably good job as president...
So you think a lefty black token judge is OK but a righty black token judge isn't.The thought of any black or other minority conservative in a position of national prominence scares the living shit out of liberals.I think the problem for many Democrats is that Ben Carson might be a competent black president.
A, It destroys their narrative that all conservatives are racist. B. it exposes their narrative that the GOP is for whites only as a lie.
Examples?...Easy. Clarence Thomas is the first modern day black person to suffer the attacks of liberals. They put up this incredible Anita Hill to testify against Thomas. She told stories of "pubic hairs on coke cans".....Her stories were just not believable.
When Condi Rice was Secy of State, left wing political cartoonists drew her caricature to make her look like Aunt Jemima. Totally racist. It was excused as " freedom of expression by the press"
The libs destroyed Herman Cain. There is no doubt that as the campaign progresses, the libs will be thinking of ways to attack Dr Carson.
no. it doesn't "scare" anyone. it's just bigots always had their house.... blacks who said whatever the masters wanted. you know, like clarence thomas going through school because of affirmative action then trying to take it away form everyone after him.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master".
clarence thomas is a disgrace to the bench and had no business being given thurgood marshall's seat. there is nothing "racist" about it.
apparently comparison confuses you.
The repubs don't endorse anti-minority policy. That's your indoctrination showing. Being against affirmative action and special treatment and set-asides is actually not being for any group. Rather, it's a reflection of neutrality. Minorities and those who support minority focus believe that if special treatment isn't afforded then it's an affront. That is what conditioning will do.Th reason blacks don't affiliate with repubs as much as they do with democrats is really a reflection of the self segregating culture of most blacks. You have the shoe on the wrong foot. It's not that repubs disassociate with blacks. It's that blacks largely refuse to affiliate with repubs due to blacks' mostly lockstep self-segregating culture. Do you really think that Major League Baseball is racist because blacks don't attend games or play much baseball? It's not MLB. It's self-segregating black culture that is responsible for that. And democrats love that and pander to it.Your premise fails terribly. Show me the neighborhoods where Blacks of any party affiliation and Republicans are frolicking together in racial harmony and bliss. Surely, the Republicans are eager to show how tolerant they are and set the example that they find the democrats to be so lacking !The democrat party panders to people as separate groups. They divide and pander. They call it diversity but it really is opportunistic segregation. That's why their diversity all live in separate neighborhoods. The white democrats flee the blacks and blacks flee from the Hispanics and the black churches and Hispanic Catholics all oppose homosexuality, another group democrats pander to.That's funny, I have never heard anyone say that except RW talking heads. No serious scholar would dare entertain his/her peers with such rubbish.Nope. The democrat party is the party of bigotry, racism and segregation. That's why they divide the country and pander. Even when their pandering conflicts with itself. Democrats are hypocritical bigots.
no. it's a function of the fact that the GOP has run the "southern strategy" since the passage of the civil rights law and endorses policies that are anti-minority.
only the guns god and gays brigade votes against their own self-interest.
So you think a lefty black token judge is OK but a righty black token judge isn't.The thought of any black or other minority conservative in a position of national prominence scares the living shit out of liberals.I think the problem for many Democrats is that Ben Carson might be a competent black president.
A, It destroys their narrative that all conservatives are racist. B. it exposes their narrative that the GOP is for whites only as a lie.
Examples?...Easy. Clarence Thomas is the first modern day black person to suffer the attacks of liberals. They put up this incredible Anita Hill to testify against Thomas. She told stories of "pubic hairs on coke cans".....Her stories were just not believable.
When Condi Rice was Secy of State, left wing political cartoonists drew her caricature to make her look like Aunt Jemima. Totally racist. It was excused as " freedom of expression by the press"
The libs destroyed Herman Cain. There is no doubt that as the campaign progresses, the libs will be thinking of ways to attack Dr Carson.
no. it doesn't "scare" anyone. it's just bigots always had their house.... blacks who said whatever the masters wanted. you know, like clarence thomas going through school because of affirmative action then trying to take it away form everyone after him.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master".
clarence thomas is a disgrace to the bench and had no business being given thurgood marshall's seat. there is nothing "racist" about it.
apparently comparison confuses you.
The repubs don't endorse anti-minority policy. That's your indoctrination showing. Being against affirmative action and special treatment and set-asides is actually not being for any group. Rather, it's a reflection of neutrality. Minorities and those who support minority focus believe that if special treatment isn't afforded then it's an affront. That is what conditioning will do.Th reason blacks don't affiliate with repubs as much as they do with democrats is really a reflection of the self segregating culture of most blacks. You have the shoe on the wrong foot. It's not that repubs disassociate with blacks. It's that blacks largely refuse to affiliate with repubs due to blacks' mostly lockstep self-segregating culture. Do you really think that Major League Baseball is racist because blacks don't attend games or play much baseball? It's not MLB. It's self-segregating black culture that is responsible for that. And democrats love that and pander to it.Your premise fails terribly. Show me the neighborhoods where Blacks of any party affiliation and Republicans are frolicking together in racial harmony and bliss. Surely, the Republicans are eager to show how tolerant they are and set the example that they find the democrats to be so lacking !The democrat party panders to people as separate groups. They divide and pander. They call it diversity but it really is opportunistic segregation. That's why their diversity all live in separate neighborhoods. The white democrats flee the blacks and blacks flee from the Hispanics and the black churches and Hispanic Catholics all oppose homosexuality, another group democrats pander to.That's funny, I have never heard anyone say that except RW talking heads. No serious scholar would dare entertain his/her peers with such rubbish.
no. it's a function of the fact that the GOP has run the "southern strategy" since the passage of the civil rights law and endorses policies that are anti-minority.
only the guns god and gays brigade votes against their own self-interest.
As long as my back is not turned towards you, I am content to be wherever.You are now in the troll bin.Apparently you don't know what trolling is! My narrative was meant for intelligent readers, you were just the dumb vehicle for conveying that purpose to others.That was a long post just to troll.Hispanic blacks are not American blacks. Nice try.I don't know what credentials you possess to make such arrogant assertions but chances are fairly good that they are no more valuable than a prize from a box of Cracker Jacks. MLB is just one sport. It is interesting to note you failed to mention the shared popularity of the NFL and NBA among White and Black fans. BUT, even MLB is popular among Black Cubans, Puerto Ricans and other Hispanic Black enclaves just as soccer is.
Baseball is the sport that first allowed blacks to integrate and make it possible for blacks to enter other pro sports. MLB goes out of its way to honor black players and negro leagues and to attract black players but the post-1960's black culture has turned its back on baseball. The proactive segregation is not with MLB or the repubs but with contemporary black culture.
BTW, my credentials are that I live in a mostly black county and have many years in a mostly black school system. I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Surely you aren't saying that Black cuban-Americans or Black puerto Rican-Americans who use Spanish as their main language are NOT Hispanic! Does my try still seem so nice?
I won't linger on Black American Hispanics. That is another discussion in the making for another thread.
Your bizarre insistence on using the lack of Black support for MLB as a sign of collective black apathy towards assimilation is insane. At best it is a weak argument..
And don't think just because you live in a mostly black county and have worked as a janitor for many years in a black school system, that has any clout around here.
"Everyone knows"..So you think a lefty black token judge is OK but a righty black token judge isn't.The thought of any black or other minority conservative in a position of national prominence scares the living shit out of liberals.
A, It destroys their narrative that all conservatives are racist. B. it exposes their narrative that the GOP is for whites only as a lie.
Examples?...Easy. Clarence Thomas is the first modern day black person to suffer the attacks of liberals. They put up this incredible Anita Hill to testify against Thomas. She told stories of "pubic hairs on coke cans".....Her stories were just not believable.
When Condi Rice was Secy of State, left wing political cartoonists drew her caricature to make her look like Aunt Jemima. Totally racist. It was excused as " freedom of expression by the press"
The libs destroyed Herman Cain. There is no doubt that as the campaign progresses, the libs will be thinking of ways to attack Dr Carson.
no. it doesn't "scare" anyone. it's just bigots always had their house.... blacks who said whatever the masters wanted. you know, like clarence thomas going through school because of affirmative action then trying to take it away form everyone after him.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master".
clarence thomas is a disgrace to the bench and had no business being given thurgood marshall's seat. there is nothing "racist" about it.
apparently comparison confuses you.
I still think any token judges are ok. Are you ignorant enough to imply that thyroid Marshall wasn't deserving of his place?
Everyone knows Thomas isn't smart enough for the bench.
Dismissing the facts does not make them non facts.The repubs don't endorse anti-minority policy. That's your indoctrination showing. Being against affirmative action and special treatment and set-asides is actually not being for any group. Rather, it's a reflection of neutrality. Minorities and those who support minority focus believe that if special treatment isn't afforded then it's an affront. That is what conditioning will do.Th reason blacks don't affiliate with repubs as much as they do with democrats is really a reflection of the self segregating culture of most blacks. You have the shoe on the wrong foot. It's not that repubs disassociate with blacks. It's that blacks largely refuse to affiliate with repubs due to blacks' mostly lockstep self-segregating culture. Do you really think that Major League Baseball is racist because blacks don't attend games or play much baseball? It's not MLB. It's self-segregating black culture that is responsible for that. And democrats love that and pander to it.Your premise fails terribly. Show me the neighborhoods where Blacks of any party affiliation and Republicans are frolicking together in racial harmony and bliss. Surely, the Republicans are eager to show how tolerant they are and set the example that they find the democrats to be so lacking !The democrat party panders to people as separate groups. They divide and pander. They call it diversity but it really is opportunistic segregation. That's why their diversity all live in separate neighborhoods. The white democrats flee the blacks and blacks flee from the Hispanics and the black churches and Hispanic Catholics all oppose homosexuality, another group democrats pander to.
no. it's a function of the fact that the GOP has run the "southern strategy" since the passage of the civil rights law and endorses policies that are anti-minority.
only the guns god and gays brigade votes against their own self-interest.
Nice words. All nonsense. *shrug*
YOU did no such thing. You'd have to be around 150 years old to be a part of the "we" who stopped slavery. But aren't you a conservative? If so, you have the roles reversed. It was liberals who emancipated the slaves from generations of conservative oppression.Really? We made you stop owning people, but you still force people to do things they don't want to do. Nothing has changed, only your methods of enslavement.That is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.Ben Carson would be an awesome President.
If you disagree then you are a racist.
only old white people are running for the Democratic party's presidential nomination. Diversity is on the Republican side. In 2012 the libs personally destroyed Herman Cain, because he was a black guy.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
Herman Cain destroyed Herman Cain because he was never serious about running for President and was on a book tour.Ben Carson would be an awesome President.
If you disagree then you are a racist.
only old white people are running for the Democratic party's presidential nomination. Diversity is on the Republican side. In 2012 the libs personally destroyed Herman Cain, because he was a black guy.
No, it is NOT absurd, it is historical fact. Many Racist democrats, including Ronald Reagan, did indeed join the party who freed the slaves and ended Jim Crow. Accept YOUR heritage and change your way of hoodwinking low information White males and ensnaring them in your web of lies.Absurd. Racist democrats joining the party who freed the slaves and ended Jim Crow? I have to school you people every day now? Accept your heritage and vow to change your ways of keeping folks on your plantation.Oh, shut up! In reality, BOTH parties can be called racist... hell, the whole damn country is racist if you really want to go there. Always wasThat is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.only old white people are running for the Democratic party's presidential nomination. Diversity is on the Republican side. In 2012 the libs personally destroyed Herman Cain, because he was a black guy.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
No, but bill clinton was good friends with democrats who did...orval faubus, and william j. fulbright, giving them awards and dedicating statues to them....and obama....he sat in a racist church for 20 years and is good friends with the racist pastor jeremiah wright and has had racist al sharpton to the White House a whole bunch.....and the democrats had Senator robert byrd....an actual member of the ku klux klan as a senior member of their party and he only died just recently.......
The democrat party is the party of racism...always has been always will be....
and always WILL be. A few God fearing Black Christians adhered to the altruistic concepts of their bible and GOD evidently thought BLACK PRAYERS MATTER. See how he turned those evil democrat racists around and made them serve their former slaves? And the racist demons jumped out of the democrats and went right into the RepubliKLANS! Heh heh heh!
Justice Thomas's judicial decisions have be well thought out, consistent and brilliant. I can't say the same thing for the white guy, justice Roberts.So you think a lefty black token judge is OK but a righty black token judge isn't.The thought of any black or other minority conservative in a position of national prominence scares the living shit out of liberals.
A, It destroys their narrative that all conservatives are racist. B. it exposes their narrative that the GOP is for whites only as a lie.
Examples?...Easy. Clarence Thomas is the first modern day black person to suffer the attacks of liberals. They put up this incredible Anita Hill to testify against Thomas. She told stories of "pubic hairs on coke cans".....Her stories were just not believable.
When Condi Rice was Secy of State, left wing political cartoonists drew her caricature to make her look like Aunt Jemima. Totally racist. It was excused as " freedom of expression by the press"
The libs destroyed Herman Cain. There is no doubt that as the campaign progresses, the libs will be thinking of ways to attack Dr Carson.
no. it doesn't "scare" anyone. it's just bigots always had their house.... blacks who said whatever the masters wanted. you know, like clarence thomas going through school because of affirmative action then trying to take it away form everyone after him.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master".
clarence thomas is a disgrace to the bench and had no business being given thurgood marshall's seat. there is nothing "racist" about it.
apparently comparison confuses you.
I still think any token judges are ok. Are you ignorant enough to imply that thyroid Marshall wasn't deserving of his place?
Everyone knows Thomas isn't smart enough for the bench.