Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gosh, I am tired of schooling you. Conservative means you are free to do as you desire. That is inconsistent with slavery. Liberal means you know better than the person you want to order about. That is consistent with slavery. conservatives would never own slaves. Liberals have their plantation unto this day.YOU did no such thing. You'd have to be around 150 years old to be a part of the "we" who stopped slavery. But aren't you a conservative? If so, you have the roles reversed. It was liberals who emancipated the slaves from generations of conservative oppression.Really? We made you stop owning people, but you still force people to do things they don't want to do. Nothing has changed, only your methods of enslavement.That is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.Ben Carson would be an awesome President.
If you disagree then you are a racist.
only old white people are running for the Democratic party's presidential nomination. Diversity is on the Republican side. In 2012 the libs personally destroyed Herman Cain, because he was a black guy.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
Gosh, I am tired of schooling you. Conservative means you are free to do as you desire. That is inconsistent with slavery. Liberal means you know better than the person you want to order about. That is consistent with slavery. conservatives would never own slaves. Liberal's have their plantation unto this day.YOU did no such thing. You'd have to be around 150 years old to be a part of the "we" who stopped slavery. But aren't you a conservative? If so, you have the roles reversed. It was liberals who emancipated the slaves from generations of conservative oppression.Really? We made you stop owning people, but you still force people to do things they don't want to do. Nothing has changed, only your methods of enslavement.That is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.only old white people are running for the Democratic party's presidential nomination. Diversity is on the Republican side. In 2012 the libs personally destroyed Herman Cain, because he was a black guy.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
YOU did no such thing. You'd have to be around 150 years old to be a part of the "we" who stopped slavery. But aren't you a conservative? If so, you have the roles reversed. It was liberals who emancipated the slaves from generations of conservative oppression.Really? We made you stop owning people, but you still force people to do things they don't want to do. Nothing has changed, only your methods of enslavement.That is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.Ben Carson would be an awesome President.
If you disagree then you are a racist.
only old white people are running for the Democratic party's presidential nomination. Diversity is on the Republican side. In 2012 the libs personally destroyed Herman Cain, because he was a black guy.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
Storm Thurmond was the only Dixiecrat who switched parties. And he did no harm to black citizens. The rest died democrats. Also, name one piece of legislation the GOP passed that supported slavery or Jim Crow laws. All laws of this nature came from the Democrat Party.No, it is NOT absurd, it is historical fact. Many Racist democrats, including Ronald Reagan, did indeed join the party who freed the slaves and ended Jim Crow. Accept YOUR heritage and change your way of hoodwinking low information White males and ensnaring them in your web of lies.Absurd. Racist democrats joining the party who freed the slaves and ended Jim Crow? I have to school you people every day now? Accept your heritage and vow to change your ways of keeping folks on your plantation.Oh, shut up! In reality, BOTH parties can be called racist... hell, the whole damn country is racist if you really want to go there. Always wasThat is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
No, but bill clinton was good friends with democrats who did...orval faubus, and william j. fulbright, giving them awards and dedicating statues to them....and obama....he sat in a racist church for 20 years and is good friends with the racist pastor jeremiah wright and has had racist al sharpton to the White House a whole bunch.....and the democrats had Senator robert byrd....an actual member of the ku klux klan as a senior member of their party and he only died just recently.......
The democrat party is the party of racism...always has been always will be....
and always WILL be. A few God fearing Black Christians adhered to the altruistic concepts of their bible and GOD evidently thought BLACK PRAYERS MATTER. See how he turned those evil democrat racists around and made them serve their former slaves? And the racist demons jumped out of the democrats and went right into the RepubliKLANS! Heh heh heh!
Oh, I haven't seen any evidence of that. But I'll take your word for it.Hillary Clinton's self- hating Jews are racist as well..
David Brock penned memo on impeaching Clarence Thomas
Are these the same "racist" Jews who supported Obama twice?
too many are regretting it now that he sold out Israel to the islamonzis
I'm not blaming these democrats of today for owning slaves or writing Jim Crow laws. I'm just trying to get them to acknowledge their heritage and to quit trying to say they were republicans. The GOP and conservatives have always been for freedom for all. It's absurd we would own slaves or write laws to interfere with another man's freedom. We have always been consistent about that.YOU did no such thing. You'd have to be around 150 years old to be a part of the "we" who stopped slavery. But aren't you a conservative? If so, you have the roles reversed. It was liberals who emancipated the slaves from generations of conservative oppression.Really? We made you stop owning people, but you still force people to do things they don't want to do. Nothing has changed, only your methods of enslavement.That is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.only old white people are running for the Democratic party's presidential nomination. Diversity is on the Republican side. In 2012 the libs personally destroyed Herman Cain, because he was a black guy.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
How about you name a few, along with the party they belong to...
Storm Thurmond was the only Dixiecrat who switched parties. And he did no harm to black citizens. The rest died democrats. Also, name one piece of legislation the GOP passed that supported slavery or Jim Crow laws. All laws of this nature came from the Democrat Party.No, it is NOT absurd, it is historical fact. Many Racist democrats, including Ronald Reagan, did indeed join the party who freed the slaves and ended Jim Crow. Accept YOUR heritage and change your way of hoodwinking low information White males and ensnaring them in your web of lies.Absurd. Racist democrats joining the party who freed the slaves and ended Jim Crow? I have to school you people every day now? Accept your heritage and vow to change your ways of keeping folks on your plantation.Oh, shut up! In reality, BOTH parties can be called racist... hell, the whole damn country is racist if you really want to go there. Always wasNot one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
No, but bill clinton was good friends with democrats who did...orval faubus, and william j. fulbright, giving them awards and dedicating statues to them....and obama....he sat in a racist church for 20 years and is good friends with the racist pastor jeremiah wright and has had racist al sharpton to the White House a whole bunch.....and the democrats had Senator robert byrd....an actual member of the ku klux klan as a senior member of their party and he only died just recently.......
The democrat party is the party of racism...always has been always will be....
and always WILL be. A few God fearing Black Christians adhered to the altruistic concepts of their bible and GOD evidently thought BLACK PRAYERS MATTER. See how he turned those evil democrat racists around and made them serve their former slaves? And the racist demons jumped out of the democrats and went right into the RepubliKLANS! Heh heh heh!
Storm Thurmond was the only Dixiecrat who switched parties. And he did no harm to black citizens. The rest died democrats. Also, name one piece of legislation the GOP passed that supported slavery or Jim Crow laws. All laws of this nature came from the Democrat Party.No, it is NOT absurd, it is historical fact. Many Racist democrats, including Ronald Reagan, did indeed join the party who freed the slaves and ended Jim Crow. Accept YOUR heritage and change your way of hoodwinking low information White males and ensnaring them in your web of lies.Absurd. Racist democrats joining the party who freed the slaves and ended Jim Crow? I have to school you people every day now? Accept your heritage and vow to change your ways of keeping folks on your plantation.Oh, shut up! In reality, BOTH parties can be called racist... hell, the whole damn country is racist if you really want to go there. Always wasNo, but bill clinton was good friends with democrats who did...orval faubus, and william j. fulbright, giving them awards and dedicating statues to them....and obama....he sat in a racist church for 20 years and is good friends with the racist pastor jeremiah wright and has had racist al sharpton to the White House a whole bunch.....and the democrats had Senator robert byrd....an actual member of the ku klux klan as a senior member of their party and he only died just recently.......
The democrat party is the party of racism...always has been always will be....
and always WILL be. A few God fearing Black Christians adhered to the altruistic concepts of their bible and GOD evidently thought BLACK PRAYERS MATTER. See how he turned those evil democrat racists around and made them serve their former slaves? And the racist demons jumped out of the democrats and went right into the RepubliKLANS! Heh heh heh!
Eyeah..did no harm..
"Early in his career, Thurmond served as a circuit court judge and presided over the 1941 trial of a colored tenant farmer accused of murder. The uppity Negro had the audacity to request a Saturday off from work, prompting the plantation owner to storm into his tent, carrying a pistol and the club he regularly used to beat servants who failed to do as they were told. The worker reached for his own gun and shot the owner, simply to avoid the deadly retribution he so obviously deserved. Judge Thurmond ignored the Supreme Court edict that excluding blacks from a jury is unconstitutional and courageously allowed an all-white jury to decide the boy’s fate. Given the boy’s defiance of his master’s orders, Thurmond refused to instruct the jury on the issue of self-defense. Needless to say, when the jury then convicted the boy of murder, Thurmond sentenced him to death. The grateful people of South Carolina responded by electing Thurmond governor."
Strom Thurmond | A Tribute to the Last True Christian Senator
YOU did no such thing. You'd have to be around 150 years old to be a part of the "we" who stopped slavery. But aren't you a conservative? If so, you have the roles reversed. It was liberals who emancipated the slaves from generations of conservative oppression.Really? We made you stop owning people, but you still force people to do things they don't want to do. Nothing has changed, only your methods of enslavement.That is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.only old white people are running for the Democratic party's presidential nomination. Diversity is on the Republican side. In 2012 the libs personally destroyed Herman Cain, because he was a black guy.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
How about you name a few, along with the party they belong to...
Gosh, I am tired of schooling you. Conservative means you are free to do as you desire. That is inconsistent with slavery. Liberal means you know better than the person you want to order about. That is consistent with slavery. conservatives would never own slaves. Liberal's have their plantation unto this day.YOU did no such thing. You'd have to be around 150 years old to be a part of the "we" who stopped slavery. But aren't you a conservative? If so, you have the roles reversed. It was liberals who emancipated the slaves from generations of conservative oppression.Really? We made you stop owning people, but you still force people to do things they don't want to do. Nothing has changed, only your methods of enslavement.That is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
No it doesn't.
I wish you guys would stop making up definitions for words.
con·serv·a·tive
[kənˈsərvətiv]
ADJECTIVE
NOUN
- holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion.
synonyms: traditionalist · traditional · conventional · orthodox ·
[more]
old-fashioned · dyed-in-the-wool · hidebound · unadventurous · set in one's ways · moderate · middle-of-the-road · buttoned-down · stick-in-the-mud
antonyms: radical
- (of dress or taste) sober and conventional:
"a conservative suit"
synonyms: conventional · sober · modest · plain · unobtrusive · restrained ·
[more]
subtle · low-key · demure · unshowy · unflashy · square · straight
antonyms: ostentatious- (of an estimate) purposely low for the sake of caution:
"the film was not cheap—$30,000 is a conservative estimate"
synonyms: low · cautious · understated · moderate · reasonable- (of surgery or medical treatment) intended to control rather than eliminate a condition, with existing tissue preserved as far as possible.
- of or relating to the Conservative Party of Great Britain or a similar party in another country.
synonyms: right-wing · reactionary · traditionalist · Republican · Tory ·
[more]
redneck
antonyms: socialist
- a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics.
synonyms: right-winger · reactionary · rightist · diehard · Republican · Tory
- a supporter or member of the Conservative Party of Great Britain or a similar party in another country.
ORIGIN
late Middle English (in the sense ‘aiming to preserve’): from late Latin conservativus, from conservat- ‘conserved,’ from the verb conservare (see conserve). Current senses date from the mid 19th century onward.
RELATED FORMS
conservative (adjective)
conservative (noun)
conservatives (plural noun)
Translate conservative to
No translation found.
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries · © Oxford University Press
holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion.
YOU did no such thing. You'd have to be around 150 years old to be a part of the "we" who stopped slavery. But aren't you a conservative? If so, you have the roles reversed. It was liberals who emancipated the slaves from generations of conservative oppression.Really? We made you stop owning people, but you still force people to do things they don't want to do. Nothing has changed, only your methods of enslavement.That is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
How about you name a few, along with the party they belong to...
I am not sure you have the IQ to understand the complexities involved in the shifting political party paradigm that took place in the middle decades of the 20th Century.
That being said, party affiliation is merely circumstantial...a convenient construct behind which conservatives and liberals of each party can move freely and vote freely. Obviously there is no mandated strict loyalty to one party or the other. Otherwise, one party would hold the reins of government in perpetuity.
Conservatism and Liberalism are the key terms here, not Republican or Democrat. Here is the answer you want >
Part (1) The True Democrats! | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
YOU did no such thing. You'd have to be around 150 years old to be a part of the "we" who stopped slavery. But aren't you a conservative? If so, you have the roles reversed. It was liberals who emancipated the slaves from generations of conservative oppression.Really? We made you stop owning people, but you still force people to do things they don't want to do. Nothing has changed, only your methods of enslavement.That is because the Democrat Party is the party of slavery and Jim Crow. They never will change.
Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
How about you name a few, along with the party they belong to...
I am not sure you have the IQ to understand the complexities involved in the shifting political party paradigm that took place in the middle decades of the 20th Century.
That being said, party affiliation is merely circumstantial...a convenient construct behind which conservatives and liberals of each party can move freely and vote freely. Obviously there is no mandated strict loyalty to one party or the other. Otherwise, one party would hold the reins of government in perpetuity.
Conservatism and Liberalism are the key terms here, not Republican or Democrat. Here is the answer you want >
Part (1) The True Democrats! | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
You lost it here... You wanna go that way, fine with me.I am not sure you have the IQ
to understand the complexities involved... bla, bla, bla...
What do you think it is?Look, scholar...When someone tells the truth about you, as I have just done with Thomas, it isn't smearing; racist or any other kind. Your opinion does not override the facts that are well documented concerning Thomas' rise to the USSC and everything else I mentioned... When White conservatives love a black man, there usually is some kind of uncle tomishness going on some where in his life!Your programmed redundancy doesn't make what you state true!That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master"
Further, that which is racist is in the eye of the beholder. I don't believe in race but I did use the word "Negro" to make a point. Besides , I could (ugh) look just like Thomas for all you know since I have never revealed my race...I could also be of the highly touted pink race!
Oh, now you don't like redundancy?
Funny, since your previous post was nothing but a reassertion of racist smearing of a great man with no attempt to address my points.
So I re-posted them, to draw attention to the fact that you had not addressed them at all.
BTW, it was not the word "Negro" that was racist about your post, and I don't care what your race is, it does not change the content of your previous post.
"Well documented"?
What is "well documented"?
The thought of any black or other minority conservative in a position of national prominence scares the living shit out of liberals.I think the problem for many Democrats is that Ben Carson might be a competent black president.
A, It destroys their narrative that all conservatives are racist. B. it exposes their narrative that the GOP is for whites only as a lie.
Examples?...Easy. Clarence Thomas is the first modern day black person to suffer the attacks of liberals. They put up this incredible Anita Hill to testify against Thomas. She told stories of "pubic hairs on coke cans".....Her stories were just not believable.
When Condi Rice was Secy of State, left wing political cartoonists drew her caricature to make her look like Aunt Jemima. Totally racist. It was excused as " freedom of expression by the press"
The libs destroyed Herman Cain. There is no doubt that as the campaign progresses, the libs will be thinking of ways to attack Dr Carson.
no. it doesn't "scare" anyone. it's just bigots always had their house.... blacks who said whatever the masters wanted. you know, like clarence thomas going through school because of affirmative action then trying to take it away form everyone after him.
That was pretty racist of you.
Clarence Thomas in one of the most powerful people in the country. He is appointed for life. He owes no one anything beyond what his character and his professionalism demand of him in relation to his office.
No one is his "master".
clarence thomas is a disgrace to the bench and had no business being given thurgood marshall's seat. there is nothing "racist" about it.
apparently comparison confuses you.
Th reason blacks don't affiliate with repubs as much as they do with democrats is really a reflection of the self segregating culture of most blacks. You have the shoe on the wrong foot. It's not that repubs disassociate with blacks. It's that blacks largely refuse to affiliate with repubs due to blacks' mostly lockstep self-segregating culture. Do you really think that Major League Baseball is racist because blacks don't attend games or play much baseball? It's not MLB. It's self-segregating black culture that is responsible for that. And democrats love that and pander to it.Your premise fails terribly. Show me the neighborhoods where Blacks of any party affiliation and Republicans are frolicking together in racial harmony and bliss. Surely, the Republicans are eager to show how tolerant they are and set the example that they find the democrats to be so lacking !The democrat party panders to people as separate groups. They divide and pander. They call it diversity but it really is opportunistic segregation. That's why their diversity all live in separate neighborhoods. The white democrats flee the blacks and blacks flee from the Hispanics and the black churches and Hispanic Catholics all oppose homosexuality, another group democrats pander to.That's funny, I have never heard anyone say that except RW talking heads. No serious scholar would dare entertain his/her peers with such rubbish.Nope. The democrat party is the party of bigotry, racism and segregation. That's why they divide the country and pander. Even when their pandering conflicts with itself. Democrats are hypocritical bigots.
no. it's a function of the fact that the GOP has run the "southern strategy" since the passage of the civil rights law and endorses policies that are anti-minority.
only the guns god and gays brigade votes against their own self-interest.
Gosh, I am tired of schooling you. Conservative means you are free to do as you desire. That is inconsistent with slavery. Liberal means you know better than the person you want to order about. That is consistent with slavery. conservatives would never own slaves. Liberal's have their plantation unto this day.YOU did no such thing. You'd have to be around 150 years old to be a part of the "we" who stopped slavery. But aren't you a conservative? If so, you have the roles reversed. It was liberals who emancipated the slaves from generations of conservative oppression.Really? We made you stop owning people, but you still force people to do things they don't want to do. Nothing has changed, only your methods of enslavement.Not one democrat alive today took part in slavery.
Jim Crow? Maybe a few old codgers in Alabama. Mississippi or Georgia!
No it doesn't.
I wish you guys would stop making up definitions for words.
con·serv·a·tive
[kənˈsərvətiv]
ADJECTIVE
NOUN
- holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion.
synonyms: traditionalist · traditional · conventional · orthodox ·
[more]
old-fashioned · dyed-in-the-wool · hidebound · unadventurous · set in one's ways · moderate · middle-of-the-road · buttoned-down · stick-in-the-mud
antonyms: radical
- (of dress or taste) sober and conventional:
"a conservative suit"
synonyms: conventional · sober · modest · plain · unobtrusive · restrained ·
[more]
subtle · low-key · demure · unshowy · unflashy · square · straight
antonyms: ostentatious- (of an estimate) purposely low for the sake of caution:
"the film was not cheap—$30,000 is a conservative estimate"
synonyms: low · cautious · understated · moderate · reasonable- (of surgery or medical treatment) intended to control rather than eliminate a condition, with existing tissue preserved as far as possible.
- of or relating to the Conservative Party of Great Britain or a similar party in another country.
synonyms: right-wing · reactionary · traditionalist · Republican · Tory ·
[more]
redneck
antonyms: socialist
- a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics.
synonyms: right-winger · reactionary · rightist · diehard · Republican · Tory
- a supporter or member of the Conservative Party of Great Britain or a similar party in another country.
ORIGIN
late Middle English (in the sense ‘aiming to preserve’): from late Latin conservativus, from conservat- ‘conserved,’ from the verb conservare (see conserve). Current senses date from the mid 19th century onward.
RELATED FORMS
conservative (adjective)
conservative (noun)
conservatives (plural noun)
Translate conservative to
No translation found.
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries · © Oxford University Press
Okay genius...what do modern American Conservatives see as "holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion.
That is easy...modern American Conservatives hold to the traditional attitudes toward the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence, which include all men being equal and endowed by their creator with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
....where the democrats of the south held to slavery
You should really think through what you post before you agree with the guys you say you oppose....
Th reason blacks don't affiliate with repubs as much as they do with democrats is really a reflection of the self segregating culture of most blacks. You have the shoe on the wrong foot. It's not that repubs disassociate with blacks. It's that blacks largely refuse to affiliate with repubs due to blacks' mostly lockstep self-segregating culture. Do you really think that Major League Baseball is racist because blacks don't attend games or play much baseball? It's not MLB. It's self-segregating black culture that is responsible for that. And democrats love that and pander to it.Your premise fails terribly. Show me the neighborhoods where Blacks of any party affiliation and Republicans are frolicking together in racial harmony and bliss. Surely, the Republicans are eager to show how tolerant they are and set the example that they find the democrats to be so lacking !The democrat party panders to people as separate groups. They divide and pander. They call it diversity but it really is opportunistic segregation. That's why their diversity all live in separate neighborhoods. The white democrats flee the blacks and blacks flee from the Hispanics and the black churches and Hispanic Catholics all oppose homosexuality, another group democrats pander to.That's funny, I have never heard anyone say that except RW talking heads. No serious scholar would dare entertain his/her peers with such rubbish.
no. it's a function of the fact that the GOP has run the "southern strategy" since the passage of the civil rights law and endorses policies that are anti-minority.
only the guns god and gays brigade votes against their own self-interest.
The Southern Strategy is a myth.
Th reason blacks don't affiliate with repubs as much as they do with democrats is really a reflection of the self segregating culture of most blacks. You have the shoe on the wrong foot. It's not that repubs disassociate with blacks. It's that blacks largely refuse to affiliate with repubs due to blacks' mostly lockstep self-segregating culture. Do you really think that Major League Baseball is racist because blacks don't attend games or play much baseball? It's not MLB. It's self-segregating black culture that is responsible for that. And democrats love that and pander to it.Your premise fails terribly. Show me the neighborhoods where Blacks of any party affiliation and Republicans are frolicking together in racial harmony and bliss. Surely, the Republicans are eager to show how tolerant they are and set the example that they find the democrats to be so lacking !The democrat party panders to people as separate groups. They divide and pander. They call it diversity but it really is opportunistic segregation. That's why their diversity all live in separate neighborhoods. The white democrats flee the blacks and blacks flee from the Hispanics and the black churches and Hispanic Catholics all oppose homosexuality, another group democrats pander to.That's funny, I have never heard anyone say that except RW talking heads. No serious scholar would dare entertain his/her peers with such rubbish.
no. it's a function of the fact that the GOP has run the "southern strategy" since the passage of the civil rights law and endorses policies that are anti-minority.
only the guns god and gays brigade votes against their own self-interest.
The Southern Strategy is a myth.
Th reason blacks don't affiliate with repubs as much as they do with democrats is really a reflection of the self segregating culture of most blacks. You have the shoe on the wrong foot. It's not that repubs disassociate with blacks. It's that blacks largely refuse to affiliate with repubs due to blacks' mostly lockstep self-segregating culture. Do you really think that Major League Baseball is racist because blacks don't attend games or play much baseball? It's not MLB. It's self-segregating black culture that is responsible for that. And democrats love that and pander to it.Your premise fails terribly. Show me the neighborhoods where Blacks of any party affiliation and Republicans are frolicking together in racial harmony and bliss. Surely, the Republicans are eager to show how tolerant they are and set the example that they find the democrats to be so lacking !The democrat party panders to people as separate groups. They divide and pander. They call it diversity but it really is opportunistic segregation. That's why their diversity all live in separate neighborhoods. The white democrats flee the blacks and blacks flee from the Hispanics and the black churches and Hispanic Catholics all oppose homosexuality, another group democrats pander to.
no. it's a function of the fact that the GOP has run the "southern strategy" since the passage of the civil rights law and endorses policies that are anti-minority.
only the guns god and gays brigade votes against their own self-interest.
The Southern Strategy is a myth.
that's a lie.
