The Right is truly, truly terrified of Hillary Clinton

[jillian]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWOJZccJVk4


Ok....



Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton Will Have Sex With A Woman On White House Desk To Get Elected | Crooks and Liars

"I'm telling you," Beck said, "Hillary Clinton will be having sex with a woman on the White House desk if it becomes popular"

Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton Would Have Sex With a Woman on the White House Desk for Popularity - NationalJournal.com

One of Beck's guests pointed out that Clinton "came out" in favor of gay marriage last year—phrasing that Beck seized upon with aplomb.

"Hillary came out last year?" he asked incredulously. "Because I didn't think that had been officially ...," he trailed off.

Beck continued with a quip about Clinton's hypothetical sexual relations in the Oval Office.

"I'm telling you, Hillary Clinton will be having sex with a woman on the White House desk if it becomes popular," he said, to his colleagues' chuckles. "She will be! She'll be like, 'Look, the arc of history wasn't ready for a president to be a lesbian and have sex on the desk.' "

Beck: Hillary 'Will Be Having Sex With A Woman On The White House Desk If It Becomes Popular'

While trashing political "cowards" who have backed gay marriage as it has become more popular with the public, conservative icon Glenn Beck appeared to reveal a pet theory that Hillary Clinton might be a lesbian.

"What I heard you just say is that Hillary came out last year?" Beck said after one of his co-hosts noted that Clinton voiced her support for same-sex marriage. "Because I didn't think that had officially…"

"I'm telling you, Hillary Clinton will be having sex with a woman on the White House desk if it becomes popular," he continued. "She'll be like, 'Look, the arc of history wasn't ready for a President to be a lesbian.'"

Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton 'Will Be Having Sex With A Woman' In The White House If It Becomes Popular

It isn't the first time that Clinton has faced conservative claims about her sexuality. In September 2013, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer pointed to a then-recent interview with Bill Clinton's alleged ex-mistress, Gennifer Flowers.

In that interview with the Daily Mail's Laura Collins, Flowers had speculated about the nature of Hillary Clinton's relationship with aide Huma Abedin (also the wife of failed New York mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner), and implied she was bisexual.

"The bottom line is that if Hillary Clinton becomes president in 2016, she will not only be our first female president, she could be our first lesbian president,” Fischer noted at the time.

Terrified of Hillary: Glenn Beck Thinks Clinton Will Claim to be a Lesbian to Win






-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yepp, they are really terrified of her and already in 2014, are getting pretty desperate



Of course, when you consider all the straight dudes out there who love to watch lesbian porn, these crazy accusations could end up being a problem for the GOP on down the road....

its awesome.

I particularly love the unvarnished misogyny in their rants.

 

[Gadawg73]

Doubt she will run.

I agree, she is too old, two tired, and has too much baggage. I also think she has some non-disclosed medical issues.

maybe the dems can run Charlie Rangel, with Farrakhan as his VP

You left out she is fat and ugly.
A 2 bagger.

 

[Billy000]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWOJZccJVk4


Ok....



Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton Will Have Sex With A Woman On White House Desk To Get Elected | Crooks and Liars




Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton Would Have Sex With a Woman on the White House Desk for Popularity - NationalJournal.com





Beck: Hillary 'Will Be Having Sex With A Woman On The White House Desk If It Becomes Popular'




Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton 'Will Be Having Sex With A Woman' In The White House If It Becomes Popular




Terrified of Hillary: Glenn Beck Thinks Clinton Will Claim to be a Lesbian to Win






-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yepp, they are really terrified of her and already in 2014, are getting pretty desperate



Of course, when you consider all the straight dudes out there who love to watch lesbian porn, these crazy accusations could end up being a problem for the GOP on down the road....

Beck never ceases ro amaze me. He is a monumentally stupid clown.

and by continually focusing on him, you fools make him richer and give him a bigger voice, just like you do with Sarah Palin.

you are so stupid that you don't realize that you are helping those that you disagree with------------in short, liberals are mental midgits.

How does me posting on this forum about him make him richer?

 

[Stephanie]

Doubt she will run.

I agree, she is too old, two tired, and has too much baggage. I also think she has some non-disclosed medical issues.

maybe the dems can run Charlie Rangel, with Farrakhan as his VP

You left out she is fat and ugly.
A 2 bagger.

3 but not quite coyote, yet

 

[Gadawg73]

I do not like Rangel's politics but he is a highly decorated war hero. Enlisted man. Dude has a Bronze Star.

 

[editec]

They NOT the ONLY ones.

 

[Gadawg73]

If I would have to look at Hillary every day I would also stoop to getting a Lewinsky from a chick that looks like John Elway with a black wig on.

 

[jillian]

Doubt she will run.

I agree, she is too old, two tired, and has too much baggage. I also think she has some non-disclosed medical issues.

maybe the dems can run Charlie Rangel, with Farrakhan as his VP

i adore how the same people commenting on Hillary's appearance drool lovingly over the oldest president we ever had. lmao....

by the way, you're ugly and your mother dresses you funny.

nah nah nah nah nah

 

[jillian]

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

the only one deflecting is you; and it's laughable. were Bush's rating static?

no they werent. in fact his approval rating about NOW where obama is right now was comparable to where obama's is RIGHT NOW at this point.
people were tired of war; and that explains the approval rating toward the end

the only one deflecting is you. you're a joke

oh; and to pull 'he never even tried to represent everyone" from your own false premise is even more laughable than the rest of your poor excuse for an argument. it represents your own wishes; and isnt backed up by anything.

by the way; people; ESPECIALLY the working poor and minorities; had it MUCH BETTER when Bush was in office

absolute lie.

but thanks for playing

 

[bedowin62]

Beck never ceases ro amaze me. He is a monumentally stupid clown.

and by continually focusing on him, you fools make him richer and give him a bigger voice, just like you do with Sarah Palin.

you are so stupid that you don't realize that you are helping those that you disagree with------------in short, liberals are mental midgits.

How does me posting on this forum about him make him richer?

because you energize the other side.

how is ranting about Beck going to make Hillary's record not one of failure?

 

[bedowin62]

the only one deflecting is you; and it's laughable. were Bush's rating static?

no they werent. in fact his approval rating about NOW where obama is right now was comparable to where obama's is RIGHT NOW at this point.
people were tired of war; and that explains the approval rating toward the end

the only one deflecting is you. you're a joke

oh; and to pull 'he never even tried to represent everyone" from your own false premise is even more laughable than the rest of your poor excuse for an argument. it represents your own wishes; and isnt backed up by anything.

by the way; people; ESPECIALLY the working poor and minorities; had it MUCH BETTER when Bush was in office

absolute lie.

but thanks for playing

great; prove i lied

i'll wait.....................

 

[natstew]

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

the only one deflecting is you; and it's laughable. were Bush's rating static?

no they werent. in fact his approval rating about NOW where obama is right now was comparable to where obama's is RIGHT NOW at this point.
people were tired of war; and that explains the approval rating toward the end

the only one deflecting is you. you're a joke

You deflected to congress and away from the electorate.

Bush jr's defining policy was warmongering. However his abysmal rating when he left office was because of the abject failure of the GOP deregulation of the economy that resulted in the 2008 collapse.

Obama's defining policy is the ACA and while his ratings are currently low the ACA is gaining approval amongst the electorate. By 2016 it should be well above 50% and that will be reflected in Obama's ratings too in all likelihood.

You are wrong again, (as usual), It was 1998, Clinton was President, he pushed repeal of Glass-Steagall and even got some Republicans to go along with him. So much for working with Democrats, they always 'backstab' the Republicans when the Repubicans 'cross the aisle'.

Repeal of Glass-Steagall Caused the Financial Crisis - US News

 

[Edgetho]

Please run Hitlery, dimocraps.

Please, please, please run that ugly scrunt of a miserable excuse for a human being.

Please.

Not only is she a lying, incompetent scum-sucking corrupt-o-crat, she's ugly. I mean -butt-ugly. Or even Fugly. More like uglier than a gunny-sack full of assholes. Or a bag of warts. Ugly-Ugly

And yes, Virginia. That counts.

When you look (and talk) like a Women's Prison Warden.........

 

[Gadawg73]

Now that former Governor from Michigan is a hottie.
If elected I would be her intern.

 

[Derideo_Te]

when bush said his "with us or against us" comment it was mean mostly for countries who looked the other way regarding terrorism and the money used to support it.
that you took that as something directed at you or fellow Americans is revealing

oh the things a leftard unwittingly admits!

The extreme right was branding everyone who did not support the warmongering as "unamerican". Your revisionism of history doesn't alter the facts.

Link?

Republican attacks on dissent since 9/11 - Brendan Nyhan

December 2001: In response to Democratic plans to question parts of the USA Patriot Act during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, John Ashcroft suggests that people who disagree with the administration's anti-terrorism policies are on the side of the terrorists. "To those who pit Americans against immigrants, and citizens against non-citizens; to those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists, for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve. They give ammunition to America's enemies, and pause to America's friends. They encourage people of good will to remain silent in the face of evil."

February 2002: Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle expresses mild disagreement with US anti-terror policies, saying US success in the war on terror "is still somewhat in doubt." In response, Rep. Tom Davis (R-VA) says that Daschle's "divisive comments have the effect of giving aid and comfort to our enemies by allowing them to exploit divisions in our country."

May 2002: After the disclosure that President Bush received a general warning about possible Al Qaeda hijackings prior to 9/11, Democrats demand to know what other information the administration had before the attacks. In response, White House communications director Dan Bartlett says that the Democratic statements "are exactly what our opponents, our enemies, want us to do."

June 2002: Republican Senate candidate Saxby Chambliss issued a press release accusing Senator Max Cleland (D-GA) of "breaking his oath to protect and defend the Constitution" because he voted for a successful 1997 amendment to the chemical weapons treaty that removed language barring inspectors from certain countries from being part of United Nations inspection teams in Iraq.

September 2002: Campaigning against Democrats who did not support his legislation to create the Department of Homeland Security (a department whose creation he had previously opposed), President Bush said that "the Senate is more interested in special interests in Washington and not interested in the security of the American people." After a speech by Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle criticizing the Bush administration and the GOP for politicizing the war on terror, Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX), the House Majority Whip, criticized those in Congress who are "questioning the president's leadership, that are constantly throwing up hurdles to keep us from doing what we have to do to protect the American people." He added, "These are people that don't want to protect the American people... [T]hey will do anything, spend all the time and resources they can, to avoid confronting evil."

May 2004: After Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) said "the direction [in Iraq] has got be changed or it is unwinnable," Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) said Democrats are "basically giving aid and comfort to the enemy." Similarly, when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called President Bush an "incompetent leader," House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) said Pelosi "apparently is so caught up in partisan hatred for President Bush that her words are putting American lives at risk."

September 2004: As John Kerry steps up his criticism of the Bush administration's handling of Iraq and the war on terror, Republicans repeatedly suggest that he is emboldening the enemy. Senator Zell Miller (D-GA) says that "while young Americans are dying in the sands of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan, our nation is being torn apart and made weaker because of the Democrats' manic obsession to bring down our Commander in Chief." President Bush says, "You can embolden an enemy by sending a mixed message... You send the wrong message to our troops by sending mixed messages." And Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) claims that terrorists "are going to throw everything they can between now and the election to try and elect Kerry," adding that Democrats are "consistently saying things that I think undermine our young men and women who are serving over there."

In addition, South Dakota GOP chair Randy Frederick attacked Senator Tom Daschle, saying "Daschle's three years as Complainer in Chief have brought shame to the honor of his office, concern to our men and women in uniform, and comfort to America's enemies." When asked about this comment, John Thune, Daschle's opponent, cited Daschle's statement that President Bush "failed so miserably at diplomacy that we're now forced to war" before the invasion of Iraq, saying "What it does is emboldens our enemies and undermines the morale of our troops," adding, "His words embolden the enemy."

July 2005: Senator Dick Durbin states that a description of US interrogation procedures at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility sounds like something "done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime -- Pol Pot or others." Presidential adviser Karl Rove responds by suggesting that Durbin and other liberals seek to put US troops in danger, saying that "Al Jazeera now broadcasts the words of Senator Durbin to the Mideast, certainly putting our troops in greater danger. No more needs to be said about the motives of liberals."

November/December 2005: With critics of the war in Iraq growing increasingly vocal, Republicans lash out, suggesting that Democrats are encouraging the enemy and want to surrender to terrorists. President Bush says that "These baseless attacks send the wrong signal to our troops and to an enemy that is questioning America's will." Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ) states that "Many on the Democratic side have revealed their exit strategy: surrender" and Rep. Geoff Davis (R-KY) says that "[T]he liberal leadership have put politics ahead of sound fiscal and national security policy. And what they have done is cooperated with our enemies and are emboldening our enemies."

After DNC chairman Howard Dean says "The idea that we're going to win this war is an idea that unfortunately is just plain wrong," Republicans reiterate the same line of attack. House Speaker Dennis Hastert says Dean "made it clear the Democratic Party sides with those who wish to surrender" and GOP chairman Ken Mehlman says Dean's statement "sends the wrong message to our troops, the wrong message to the enemy, the wrong message to the Iraqi people."

 

[Billy000]

and by continually focusing on him, you fools make him richer and give him a bigger voice, just like you do with Sarah Palin.

you are so stupid that you don't realize that you are helping those that you disagree with------------in short, liberals are mental midgits.

How does me posting on this forum about him make him richer?

because you energize the other side.

how is ranting about Beck going to make Hillary's record not one of failure?

How does me "energizing the other side" on this forum make him richer?

My ranting has no effect on either of these individuals.

 

[Stephanie]

and by continually focusing on him, you fools make him richer and give him a bigger voice, just like you do with Sarah Palin.

you are so stupid that you don't realize that you are helping those that you disagree with------------in short, liberals are mental midgits.

How does me posting on this forum about him make him richer?

because you energize the other side.

how is ranting about Beck going to make Hillary's record not one of failure?

no kidding, are we suppose to give a shit what Beck says...my gawd the brainless and stupid around here

 

[bedowin62]

oh; and to pull 'he never even tried to represent everyone" from your own false premise is even more laughable than the rest of your poor excuse for an argument. it represents your own wishes; and isnt backed up by anything.

by the way; people; ESPECIALLY the working poor and minorities; had it MUCH BETTER when Bush was in office

absolute lie.

but thanks for playing

great; prove i lied

i'll wait.....................

pathetic left-wing loser Jillian; you called my claim an "absolute lie".
as opposed to a not so absolute lie?

lol anyway you sound so convinced. it is an absolute lie you should have been able to provide the "truth" by now.
what's taking you so long?

 

[Gadawg73]

What Hillary does in her private life is none of my business but if she divorced Bill and led a real life I would have more respect for her.
Many a sham marriage in politics equally divided in both parties but electing someone President that lives a lie in their personal life?
No.

 

[Derideo_Te]

when bush said his "with us or against us" comment it was mean mostly for countries who looked the other way regarding terrorism and the money used to support it.
that you took that as something directed at you or fellow Americans is revealing

oh the things a leftard unwittingly admits!

The extreme right was branding everyone who did not support the warmongering as "unamerican". Your revisionism of history doesn't alter the facts.

that is simply not true--------encouraging americans to support our kids in uniform is not support of warmongering. What was said is that even though you may not support the conflict, you should support our troops-------unlike what was done to our military during and after viet nam.

its your kind of revisionist history that is dividing this country, try dealing with the truth, it might make you sleep better.

Irrefutable facts say otherwise!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/9024901-post95.html