The Right is truly, truly terrified of Hillary Clinton

[bedowin62]

Did Bush jr represent all of the people who did not subscribe to his warmongering agenda? His approval ratings would indicate that he did not try to represent all of the people. Quite the opposite in fact, he called those that disagreed terrorist supporters. Accusing Obama of being divisive while ignoring Bush jr destroys your position.

America is far more divided now than it was under Bush. it's comical the way the Left runs away from the fact dems voted for nearly every bush and republican policy. why would they do that?
you losers always want it both ways; either bush's policies were so "divisive" and "disastrous" that you Dems shouldnt have voted for them; or your record indicates you DID vote for them (it does) and you are BEING DIVISIVE LYING ABOUT YOUR OWN RECORD all for political gain

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

the only one deflecting is you; and it's laughable. were Bush's rating static?

no they werent. in fact his approval rating about NOW where obama is right now was comparable to where obama's is RIGHT NOW at this point.
people were tired of war; and that explains the approval rating toward the end

the only one deflecting is you. you're a joke

 

[bodecea]

Think of all those RW dudes who love their lesbie-porn.

Boy, oh boy, are they gonna be conflicted in 2016.

good one doofus; now can you get out of people's bedrooms?

lol

libs are such idiotic fools and hypocrites

Ironic post is Ironic.

 

[Derideo_Te]

when bush said his "with us or against us" comment it was mean mostly for countries who looked the other way regarding terrorism and the money used to support it.
that you took that as something directed at you or fellow Americans is revealing

oh the things a leftard unwittingly admits!

The extreme right was branding everyone who did not support the warmongering as "unamerican". Your revisionism of history doesn't alter the facts.

 

[Redfish]

Did Bush jr represent all of the people who did not subscribe to his warmongering agenda? His approval ratings would indicate that he did not try to represent all of the people. Quite the opposite in fact, he called those that disagreed terrorist supporters. Accusing Obama of being divisive while ignoring Bush jr destroys your position.

America is far more divided now than it was under Bush. it's comical the way the Left runs away from the fact dems voted for nearly every bush and republican policy. why would they do that?
you losers always want it both ways; either bush's policies were so "divisive" and "disastrous" that you Dems shouldnt have voted for them; or your record indicates you DID vote for them (it does) and you are BEING DIVISIVE LYING ABOUT YOUR OWN RECORD all for political gain

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

One of the first things Bush did was try to work with Ted Kennedy on education and immigration. Did he try hard enough? who knows what was done behind closed doors. The problem is that DC has become so partisan that no one can get anything done-------------we need another Reagan and O'Neill----------where are the statesmen of today?

 

[bedowin62]

America is far more divided now than it was under Bush. it's comical the way the Left runs away from the fact dems voted for nearly every bush and republican policy. why would they do that?
you losers always want it both ways; either bush's policies were so "divisive" and "disastrous" that you Dems shouldnt have voted for them; or your record indicates you DID vote for them (it does) and you are BEING DIVISIVE LYING ABOUT YOUR OWN RECORD all for political gain

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

the only one deflecting is you; and it's laughable. were Bush's rating static?

no they werent. in fact his approval rating about NOW where obama is right now was comparable to where obama's is RIGHT NOW at this point.
people were tired of war; and that explains the approval rating toward the end

the only one deflecting is you. you're a joke

oh; and to pull 'he never even tried to represent everyone" from your own false premise is even more laughable than the rest of your poor excuse for an argument. it represents your own wishes; and isnt backed up by anything.

by the way; people; ESPECIALLY the working poor and minorities; had it MUCH BETTER when Bush was in office

 

[The Rabbi]

when bush said his "with us or against us" comment it was mean mostly for countries who looked the other way regarding terrorism and the money used to support it.
that you took that as something directed at you or fellow Americans is revealing

oh the things a leftard unwittingly admits!

The extreme right was branding everyone who did not support the warmongering as "unamerican". Your revisionism of history doesn't alter the facts.

Link?

 

[Derideo_Te]

America is far more divided now than it was under Bush. it's comical the way the Left runs away from the fact dems voted for nearly every bush and republican policy. why would they do that?
you losers always want it both ways; either bush's policies were so "divisive" and "disastrous" that you Dems shouldnt have voted for them; or your record indicates you DID vote for them (it does) and you are BEING DIVISIVE LYING ABOUT YOUR OWN RECORD all for political gain

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

Pres Bush had the highest approval rating of any president ever.
WHen Truman left office his ratings were among the lowest. Did Truman not represent all Americans?
Your arguments are typically ignorant bullshit.

Bush jr's high approval rating was a response to the people rallying around following the 9/11 attack. Immediately prior to 9/11 his approval ratings had been dropping fast and were about to dip below 50%. He subsequently left office with the lowest approval rating of any president, even Truman. A one time blip does not eradicate the overall failure of his policies.

 

[bedowin62]

it's comical to watch the lib talking points.

"warmongering"?

Dems as a Party voted to keep fighting and funding both wars for a decade

after ridiculing the troop surge in iraq under bush obama did the same thing in afghanistan.

dems called bush as "war criminal" for drone attacks that killed civilians

drone attacks have TRIPLED under obama; not a peep from o-bots or the Left. where is cindy sheehan these days? locked in the WH basement?


and losers like the idiot here have the GALL to try to accuse others of deflecting or avoiding the topic?


libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[Redfish]

when bush said his "with us or against us" comment it was mean mostly for countries who looked the other way regarding terrorism and the money used to support it.
that you took that as something directed at you or fellow Americans is revealing

oh the things a leftard unwittingly admits!

The extreme right was branding everyone who did not support the warmongering as "unamerican". Your revisionism of history doesn't alter the facts.

that is simply not true--------encouraging americans to support our kids in uniform is not support of warmongering. What was said is that even though you may not support the conflict, you should support our troops-------unlike what was done to our military during and after viet nam.

its your kind of revisionist history that is dividing this country, try dealing with the truth, it might make you sleep better.

 

[natstew]

I'm not positioned on the right - but even I am a little uneasy about the possibility of a Hillary Clinton administration. But when I read posts like the one above (basically blaming a woman for the sins of her husband) I hate to align myself with folks of that mindset.

You got it wrong, Hillary was destroying any woman who spoke up about Bill sexually assaulting them, goes all the way back to college.

 

[nodoginnafight]

America is far more divided now than it was under Bush.

That's not true. in 2000 the nation was split about 50 - 50 in the POTUS election.
In 2004 the split was 51 to 48 Bush.

That's pretty sharply divided.

Post Bush the 2008 election was 53% to 46%
and 2012 was 51 - 47

So the numbers indicate the country is LESS divided than it was during Bush's administration.

Of course, I guess you could credit Bush with bringing the country together because when he left office, 78% of Americans were united in their belief that he sucked.

 

[bedowin62]

right now; through five -plus years of obama; Bush's average approval rating is higher than obama's

keep trying though left-wing idiot

lol

 

[bedowin62]

America is far more divided now than it was under Bush.

That's not true. in 2000 the nation was split about 50 - 50 in the POTUS election.
In 2004 the split was 51 to 48 Bush.

That's pretty sharply divided.

Post Bush the 2008 election was 53% to 46%
and 2012 was 51 - 47

Sothe numbers indicate the country is LESS divided than it was during Bush's administration.

Of course, I guess you could credit Bush with bringing the country together because when he left office, 78% of Americans were united in their belief that he sucked.

yea and these message boards indicate American is less divided under obama too huh idiot?

 

[Derideo_Te]

America is far more divided now than it was under Bush. it's comical the way the Left runs away from the fact dems voted for nearly every bush and republican policy. why would they do that?
you losers always want it both ways; either bush's policies were so "divisive" and "disastrous" that you Dems shouldnt have voted for them; or your record indicates you DID vote for them (it does) and you are BEING DIVISIVE LYING ABOUT YOUR OWN RECORD all for political gain

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

the only one deflecting is you; and it's laughable. were Bush's rating static?

no they werent. in fact his approval rating about NOW where obama is right now was comparable to where obama's is RIGHT NOW at this point.
people were tired of war; and that explains the approval rating toward the end

the only one deflecting is you. you're a joke

You deflected to congress and away from the electorate.

Bush jr's defining policy was warmongering. However his abysmal rating when he left office was because of the abject failure of the GOP deregulation of the economy that resulted in the 2008 collapse.

Obama's defining policy is the ACA and while his ratings are currently low the ACA is gaining approval amongst the electorate. By 2016 it should be well above 50% and that will be reflected in Obama's ratings too in all likelihood.

 

[bedowin62]

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

the only one deflecting is you; and it's laughable. were Bush's rating static?

no they werent. in fact his approval rating about NOW where obama is right now was comparable to where obama's is RIGHT NOW at this point.
people were tired of war; and that explains the approval rating toward the end

the only one deflecting is you. you're a joke

You deflected to congress and away from the electorate.

Bush jr's defining policy was warmongering. However his abysmal rating when he left office was because of the abject failure of the GOP deregulation of the economy that resulted in the 2008 collapse.

Obama's defining policy is the ACA and while his ratings are currently low the ACA is gaining approval amongst the electorate. By 2016 it should be well above 50% and that will be reflected in Obama's ratings too in all likelihood.

YAWN
the "electrate" as you see them AT ONE POINT in time.

like i said obama is at about the same place bush was at this point.

you losers demand the right to frame every debate in your own terms; then cry when you are called on it

 

[Derideo_Te]

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

the only one deflecting is you; and it's laughable. were Bush's rating static?

no they werent. in fact his approval rating about NOW where obama is right now was comparable to where obama's is RIGHT NOW at this point.
people were tired of war; and that explains the approval rating toward the end

the only one deflecting is you. you're a joke

oh; and to pull 'he never even tried to represent everyone" from your own false premise is even more laughable than the rest of your poor excuse for an argument. it represents your own wishes; and isnt backed up by anything.

by the way; people; ESPECIALLY the working poor and minorities; had it MUCH BETTER when Bush was in office

Facts not in evidence! The poverty rate had been steadily dropping under Clinton. Under Bush jr it reversed direction and climbed instead.

 

[Wildman]

Hillary will stand in front of the coffins of American heroes and lie to the American people...

what do you mean.., "will" ?? i believe she already done that liberliar trick.

 

[bedowin62]

if you could only name a "GOP DEREGULATION" that supposedly caused the economic collapse; you might not look so stupid

oh and by calling it "GOP deregulation" you are already admitting even IF you can try to pin the whole thing on Republicans; those events took place before Bush took office

you're a joke. let's see what you got

 

[bedowin62]

the only one deflecting is you; and it's laughable. were Bush's rating static?

no they werent. in fact his approval rating about NOW where obama is right now was comparable to where obama's is RIGHT NOW at this point.
people were tired of war; and that explains the approval rating toward the end

the only one deflecting is you. you're a joke

oh; and to pull 'he never even tried to represent everyone" from your own false premise is even more laughable than the rest of your poor excuse for an argument. it represents your own wishes; and isnt backed up by anything.

by the way; people; ESPECIALLY the working poor and minorities; had it MUCH BETTER when Bush was in office

Facts not in evidence! The poverty rate had been steadily dropping under Clinton. Under Bush jr it reversed direction and climbed instead.

obama; not clinton; is president you mindless moron

the poverty rate and minority unemployment is HIGHER UNDER OBAMA THAN IT WAS UNDER BUSH
again you losers on the Left try to dictate the parameters of every debate; when the truth is inconveniant to your narrative

jokes

 

[bedowin62]

oh; and to pull 'he never even tried to represent everyone" from your own false premise is even more laughable than the rest of your poor excuse for an argument. it represents your own wishes; and isnt backed up by anything.

by the way; people; ESPECIALLY the working poor and minorities; had it MUCH BETTER when Bush was in office

Facts not in evidence! The poverty rate had been steadily dropping under Clinton. Under Bush jr it reversed direction and climbed instead.

obama; not clinton; is president you mindless moron

the poverty rate and minority unemployment is HIGHER UNDER OBAMA THAN IT WAS UNDER BUSH
again you losers on the Left try to dictate the parameters of every debate; when the truth is inconveniant to your narrative

jokes

oh; and who's deflecting now?