The Right is truly, truly terrified of Hillary Clinton

[Billy000]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWOJZccJVk4


Ok....



Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton Will Have Sex With A Woman On White House Desk To Get Elected | Crooks and Liars

"I'm telling you," Beck said, "Hillary Clinton will be having sex with a woman on the White House desk if it becomes popular"

Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton Would Have Sex With a Woman on the White House Desk for Popularity - NationalJournal.com

One of Beck's guests pointed out that Clinton "came out" in favor of gay marriage last year—phrasing that Beck seized upon with aplomb.

"Hillary came out last year?" he asked incredulously. "Because I didn't think that had been officially ...," he trailed off.

Beck continued with a quip about Clinton's hypothetical sexual relations in the Oval Office.

"I'm telling you, Hillary Clinton will be having sex with a woman on the White House desk if it becomes popular," he said, to his colleagues' chuckles. "She will be! She'll be like, 'Look, the arc of history wasn't ready for a president to be a lesbian and have sex on the desk.' "

Beck: Hillary 'Will Be Having Sex With A Woman On The White House Desk If It Becomes Popular'

While trashing political "cowards" who have backed gay marriage as it has become more popular with the public, conservative icon Glenn Beck appeared to reveal a pet theory that Hillary Clinton might be a lesbian.

"What I heard you just say is that Hillary came out last year?" Beck said after one of his co-hosts noted that Clinton voiced her support for same-sex marriage. "Because I didn't think that had officially…"

"I'm telling you, Hillary Clinton will be having sex with a woman on the White House desk if it becomes popular," he continued. "She'll be like, 'Look, the arc of history wasn't ready for a President to be a lesbian.'"

Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton 'Will Be Having Sex With A Woman' In The White House If It Becomes Popular

It isn't the first time that Clinton has faced conservative claims about her sexuality. In September 2013, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer pointed to a then-recent interview with Bill Clinton's alleged ex-mistress, Gennifer Flowers.

In that interview with the Daily Mail's Laura Collins, Flowers had speculated about the nature of Hillary Clinton's relationship with aide Huma Abedin (also the wife of failed New York mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner), and implied she was bisexual.

"The bottom line is that if Hillary Clinton becomes president in 2016, she will not only be our first female president, she could be our first lesbian president,” Fischer noted at the time.

Terrified of Hillary: Glenn Beck Thinks Clinton Will Claim to be a Lesbian to Win






-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yepp, they are really terrified of her and already in 2014, are getting pretty desperate



Of course, when you consider all the straight dudes out there who love to watch lesbian porn, these crazy accusations could end up being a problem for the GOP on down the road....

Beck never ceases ro amaze me. He is a monumentally stupid clown.

 

[Redfish]

Hillary will get the female, moderate, minority and Democrat vote, what's left for the far right? Hmmmm, let me think.

Bullshit---------women are fed up with the incompetence and lies of dems and libs, women do not respect a woman who looks the other way while her husband commits rape and sex with juveniles. Moderates are also fed up with the failures of liberalism. She may get the black vote, but asians, hispanics, and other minority groups do not like her or her politics.

the next two elections will return control to republicans and others who are dedicated to the constitution, effective govt, stopping the waste, creating real jobs, protecting americans at home and abroad, and returning the country to sanity.

you lefties had your chance--and you failed----you elected the worst president in history and he has destroyed your party and your philosophy-------------congratulations, idiots.

The voice from the extreme far right sees things through red-tinted glasses only.

If the truth has a red tint, then so be it. What I said is the truth. Deal with it. you guys failed, your hero failed, your liberal ideas failed, its over.

 

[blackhawk]

I'm not interested in seeing Obamas third term which is essentially what a Hillary election would be. I'm pretty much sick of all the political family dynasty's Clinton, Bush, and Kennedy.

 

[Stephanie]

Hillary will be another Obama just in a pant suit

we should all feel blessed the woman who couldn't control her predatory hubby who used young woman as play toy's will be in control of our country

 

[nodoginnafight]

I'm not positioned on the right - but even I am a little uneasy about the possibility of a Hillary Clinton administration. But when I read posts like the one above (basically blaming a woman for the sins of her husband) I hate to align myself with folks of that mindset.

 

[Vermonter]

We are 32 months away from the 2016 election. 32 Months.

Seems I remember that 32 months away from the 2008 election, Madame Hillary was a shoe in for the nomination. It was going to be a coronation.

But something happened. A community organizer with a nanosecond in the US Senate came along and showed her the door. 32 Months before the 2008 election, nobody even heard of Barack Obama, let alone think he would defeat Madame Hillary!

She's going to be 69 years old in November 2016. She has also suffered a brain injury which meant she couldn't retestify in the Benghazi hearings.

She has NO record of accomplishment in the Senate. She introduced NO legislation.
Her record as Secretary of State is abysmal. She forged NO treaties, she stopped NO wars, and she backed the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

America does not want four more years of Barack Obama in drag.

 

[Redfish]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWOJZccJVk4


Ok....



Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton Will Have Sex With A Woman On White House Desk To Get Elected | Crooks and Liars

"I'm telling you," Beck said, "Hillary Clinton will be having sex with a woman on the White House desk if it becomes popular"

Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton Would Have Sex With a Woman on the White House Desk for Popularity - NationalJournal.com





Beck: Hillary 'Will Be Having Sex With A Woman On The White House Desk If It Becomes Popular'




Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton 'Will Be Having Sex With A Woman' In The White House If It Becomes Popular

It isn't the first time that Clinton has faced conservative claims about her sexuality. In September 2013, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer pointed to a then-recent interview with Bill Clinton's alleged ex-mistress, Gennifer Flowers.

In that interview with the Daily Mail's Laura Collins, Flowers had speculated about the nature of Hillary Clinton's relationship with aide Huma Abedin (also the wife of failed New York mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner), and implied she was bisexual.

"The bottom line is that if Hillary Clinton becomes president in 2016, she will not only be our first female president, she could be our first lesbian president,” Fischer noted at the time.

Terrified of Hillary: Glenn Beck Thinks Clinton Will Claim to be a Lesbian to Win






-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yepp, they are really terrified of her and already in 2014, are getting pretty desperate



Of course, when you consider all the straight dudes out there who love to watch lesbian porn, these crazy accusations could end up being a problem for the GOP on down the road....

Beck never ceases ro amaze me. He is a monumentally stupid clown.

and by continually focusing on him, you fools make him richer and give him a bigger voice, just like you do with Sarah Palin.

you are so stupid that you don't realize that you are helping those that you disagree with------------in short, liberals are mental midgits.

 

[Derideo_Te]

all the left and people like the op cares about, is winning

they don't care if a President represents ALL the people...their needs are much more important

The last president who represented "ALL the people" was George Washington as far as the electorate is concerned.

Since then there has always been a partisan divide of one kind or another.

Disclaimer: Technically the president does represent all of the people but I using the same context as Stephanie for the purposes of debating this point.

the point is that previous presidents at least TRIED to represent all of the people. Obama clearly has no desire to represent anyone who does not subscribe to his marxist collectivist agenda.

Did Bush jr represent all of the people who did not subscribe to his warmongering agenda? His approval ratings would indicate that he did not try to represent all of the people. Quite the opposite in fact, he called those that disagreed terrorist supporters. Accusing Obama of being divisive while ignoring Bush jr destroys your position.

 

[The Rabbi]

Hillary Clinton has a 30 year history of lying and incompetence. She has never achieved anything and got her positions largely on the strength of her husband's name.
IOW she's the perfect Dem candidate.
Yeah, the GOP isn't scared of her. That's a laugh. She's the weakest candidate the Dems have put up in years. ANd she's the strongest candidate they have. The Democrats are out of ideas, out of integrity, and soon to be out of power.

 

[bedowin62]

The last president who represented "ALL the people" was George Washington as far as the electorate is concerned.

Since then there has always been a partisan divide of one kind or another.

Disclaimer: Technically the president does represent all of the people but I using the same context as Stephanie for the purposes of debating this point.

the point is that previous presidents at least TRIED to represent all of the people. Obama clearly has no desire to represent anyone who does not subscribe to his marxist collectivist agenda.

Did Bush jr represent all of the people who did not subscribe to his warmongering agenda? His approval ratings would indicate that he did not try to represent all of the people. Quite the opposite in fact, he called those that disagreed terrorist supporters. Accusing Obama of being divisive while ignoring Bush jr destroys your position.

America is far more divided now than it was under Bush. it's comical the way the Left runs away from the fact dems voted for nearly every bush and republican policy. why would they do that?
you losers always want it both ways; either bush's policies were so "divisive" and "disastrous" that you Dems shouldnt have voted for them; or your record indicates you DID vote for them (it does) and you are BEING DIVISIVE LYING ABOUT YOUR OWN RECORD all for political gain

 

[Redfish]

The last president who represented "ALL the people" was George Washington as far as the electorate is concerned.

Since then there has always been a partisan divide of one kind or another.

Disclaimer: Technically the president does represent all of the people but I using the same context as Stephanie for the purposes of debating this point.

the point is that previous presidents at least TRIED to represent all of the people. Obama clearly has no desire to represent anyone who does not subscribe to his marxist collectivist agenda.

Did Bush jr represent all of the people who did not subscribe to his warmongering agenda? His approval ratings would indicate that he did not try to represent all of the people. Quite the opposite in fact, he called those that disagreed terrorist supporters. Accusing Obama of being divisive while ignoring Bush jr destroys your position.

you have an interesting view of history. Yes, the Iraq war was a stupid waste---but Bush did not do it alone, congress (both parties) voted to authroize and fund that huge fiasco.

Bush also did not have an adoring media that constantly tried to cover for him like obama has.

If Bush had obama's media, his ratings would have been much higher. We have allowed our media to have too much power and we do not require them to give us the truth. We might as well stop using the word "media" and start using "pravda".

 

[rdean]

Is there anything they aren't terrified of?

 

[The Rabbi]

Pres Bush received the highest approval rating of any president in office.
And then the Democrats bailed on him when things didnt go just how they wanted.

 

[HelenaHandbag]

I'm not positioned on the right - but even I am a little uneasy about the possibility of a Hillary Clinton administration. But when I read posts like the one above (basically blaming a woman for the sins of her husband) I hate to align myself with folks of that mindset.

I think it is less blaming her for the sins of he husband and more of the sitting around in utter humiliation, in hopes of a political payoff in the end.

That translates to wanting it too much.

 

[bedowin62]

when bush said his "with us or against us" comment it was mean mostly for countries who looked the other way regarding terrorism and the money used to support it.
that you took that as something directed at you or fellow Americans is revealing

oh the things a leftard unwittingly admits!

 

[bodecea]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWOJZccJVk4


Ok....



Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton Will Have Sex With A Woman On White House Desk To Get Elected | Crooks and Liars

"I'm telling you," Beck said, "Hillary Clinton will be having sex with a woman on the White House desk if it becomes popular"

Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton Would Have Sex With a Woman on the White House Desk for Popularity - NationalJournal.com

One of Beck's guests pointed out that Clinton "came out" in favor of gay marriage last year—phrasing that Beck seized upon with aplomb.

"Hillary came out last year?" he asked incredulously. "Because I didn't think that had been officially ...," he trailed off.

Beck continued with a quip about Clinton's hypothetical sexual relations in the Oval Office.

"I'm telling you, Hillary Clinton will be having sex with a woman on the White House desk if it becomes popular," he said, to his colleagues' chuckles. "She will be! She'll be like, 'Look, the arc of history wasn't ready for a president to be a lesbian and have sex on the desk.' "

Beck: Hillary 'Will Be Having Sex With A Woman On The White House Desk If It Becomes Popular'

While trashing political "cowards" who have backed gay marriage as it has become more popular with the public, conservative icon Glenn Beck appeared to reveal a pet theory that Hillary Clinton might be a lesbian.

"What I heard you just say is that Hillary came out last year?" Beck said after one of his co-hosts noted that Clinton voiced her support for same-sex marriage. "Because I didn't think that had officially…"

"I'm telling you, Hillary Clinton will be having sex with a woman on the White House desk if it becomes popular," he continued. "She'll be like, 'Look, the arc of history wasn't ready for a President to be a lesbian.'"

Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton 'Will Be Having Sex With A Woman' In The White House If It Becomes Popular

It isn't the first time that Clinton has faced conservative claims about her sexuality. In September 2013, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer pointed to a then-recent interview with Bill Clinton's alleged ex-mistress, Gennifer Flowers.

In that interview with the Daily Mail's Laura Collins, Flowers had speculated about the nature of Hillary Clinton's relationship with aide Huma Abedin (also the wife of failed New York mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner), and implied she was bisexual.

"The bottom line is that if Hillary Clinton becomes president in 2016, she will not only be our first female president, she could be our first lesbian president,” Fischer noted at the time.

Terrified of Hillary: Glenn Beck Thinks Clinton Will Claim to be a Lesbian to Win






-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yepp, they are really terrified of her and already in 2014, are getting pretty desperate



Of course, when you consider all the straight dudes out there who love to watch lesbian porn, these crazy accusations could end up being a problem for the GOP on down the road....

This kind of talk would have destroyed a woman running for office a few decades ago. Now....not so much. Let Beck rant.

 

[Redfish]

I'm not positioned on the right - but even I am a little uneasy about the possibility of a Hillary Clinton administration. But when I read posts like the one above (basically blaming a woman for the sins of her husband) I hate to align myself with folks of that mindset.

I think it is less blaming her for the sins of he husband and more of the sitting around in utter humiliation, in hopes of a political payoff in the end.

That translates to wanting it too much.

said another way, she has no principles other than gaining political power. She sold her soul for a chance to be the first female president, and she blew it. She is a total failure.

 

[Derideo_Te]

the point is that previous presidents at least TRIED to represent all of the people. Obama clearly has no desire to represent anyone who does not subscribe to his marxist collectivist agenda.

Did Bush jr represent all of the people who did not subscribe to his warmongering agenda? His approval ratings would indicate that he did not try to represent all of the people. Quite the opposite in fact, he called those that disagreed terrorist supporters. Accusing Obama of being divisive while ignoring Bush jr destroys your position.

America is far more divided now than it was under Bush. it's comical the way the Left runs away from the fact dems voted for nearly every bush and republican policy. why would they do that?
you losers always want it both ways; either bush's policies were so "divisive" and "disastrous" that you Dems shouldnt have voted for them; or your record indicates you DID vote for them (it does) and you are BEING DIVISIVE LYING ABOUT YOUR OWN RECORD all for political gain

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

 

[Derideo_Te]

the point is that previous presidents at least TRIED to represent all of the people. Obama clearly has no desire to represent anyone who does not subscribe to his marxist collectivist agenda.

Did Bush jr represent all of the people who did not subscribe to his warmongering agenda? His approval ratings would indicate that he did not try to represent all of the people. Quite the opposite in fact, he called those that disagreed terrorist supporters. Accusing Obama of being divisive while ignoring Bush jr destroys your position.

you have an interesting view of history. Yes, the Iraq war was a stupid waste---but Bush did not do it alone, congress (both parties) voted to authroize and fund that huge fiasco.

Bush also did not have an adoring media that constantly tried to cover for him like obama has.

If Bush had obama's media, his ratings would have been much higher. We have allowed our media to have too much power and we do not require them to give us the truth. We might as well stop using the word "media" and start using "pravda".

So now it is the fault of the media rather than his failed policies?

 

[The Rabbi]

Did Bush jr represent all of the people who did not subscribe to his warmongering agenda? His approval ratings would indicate that he did not try to represent all of the people. Quite the opposite in fact, he called those that disagreed terrorist supporters. Accusing Obama of being divisive while ignoring Bush jr destroys your position.

America is far more divided now than it was under Bush. it's comical the way the Left runs away from the fact dems voted for nearly every bush and republican policy. why would they do that?
you losers always want it both ways; either bush's policies were so "divisive" and "disastrous" that you Dems shouldnt have voted for them; or your record indicates you DID vote for them (it does) and you are BEING DIVISIVE LYING ABOUT YOUR OWN RECORD all for political gain

Deflection indicates that you cannot support your fallacious position. The point raised by Stephanie was representation of all of the people by the president. Deflecting to congress demonstrates that you have no valid rebuttal to the low approval ratings by the electorate of Bush jr and his policies. Therefore you are conceding that he never even TRIED to represent everyone.

Pres Bush had the highest approval rating of any president ever.
WHen Truman left office his ratings were among the lowest. Did Truman not represent all Americans?
Your arguments are typically ignorant bullshit.