The Right To Bear Arms

[M14 Shooter]

According to Scalia...who supposedly was an "originalist" and ....wasn't

No. According to the United States Supreme Court.
You are fully aware that you opinion runs contrary to established fact.

 

[danielpalos]

Heller vs DC.

Individual right free from connection with militia service.

a simple error in law subject to our Ninth Amendment.

There is no appeal to ignorance of the law in federal venues.

 

[danielpalos]

There are no individual rights in our Second Amendment because it is about the security of a free State not natural rights.

It's not about the "right of the people to keep and bear arms" like the CLEAR, EXPRESS LANGUAGE STATE, YOU FUCKING MEXICAN ASSWIPE!!!!

SHUT THE FUCK UP, TROLL!!!

.

The People not the Persons. It makes all the difference in the world to the security of a free State.

Given that the first amendment specifies that the right of the people to assemble is protected, does that mean you have the right to get together with anyone you choose, or must you be a part of an organized group to get together on a street corner?

Our Second Amendment declares which subset of the People have literal recourse.

Stop trolling

you need a valid argument not fallacious ad hominems.

 

[danielpalos]

According to Scalia...who supposedly was an "originalist" and ....wasn't

No. According to the United States Supreme Court.
You are fully aware that you opinion runs contrary to established fact.

Our form of Socialism is limited to Express powers delegated by the People our representatives to Government.

 

[Lesh]

Stop fucking TROLLING

Troll

 

[danielpalos]

Stop fucking TROLLING

Troll

what objection do you argumentatively have?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

a simple error in law subject to our Ninth Amendment.

The 9th Amendment helps OUR argument. Not yours.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Only the Supreme Court has the authority to determine the meaning of the Second Amendment.

And they rejected the interpritation that the 2A protects the right of a militia, not induviduals.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Our Second Amendment declares which subset of the People have literal recourse.

It literally states that the right of the people (no qualification)...shall not be infringed.

 

[danielpalos]

a simple error in law subject to our Ninth Amendment.

The 9th Amendment helps OUR argument. Not yours.

There are no individual terms in our Second Article of Amendment. All terms are collective and plural. You cannot claim any implied individual right from the syntax expressly declared in our supreme law of the land.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The first clause expressly declares it to be the "gospel Truth" for the militia of the United States.

It states that A militia and does not specifically refer to or name a specific organization or body.

It literally states that a militia is necessary and literally states that the right of the people shall not be infringed.

 

[danielpalos]

The first clause expressly declares it to be the "gospel Truth" for the militia of the United States.

It states that A militia and does not specifically refer to or name a specific organization or body.

It literally states that a militia is necessary and literally states that the right of the people shall not be infringed.

I am not sure why you believe you can appeal to ignorance of this common law fact:

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

That is the common law for the common defense.

 

[hadit]

It doesn't say that. I know you desperately want it to, because you continually say it does, but it just doesn't.

lol. Nobody takes the right wing seriously about the Law, Constitutional or otherwise. Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.

Everyone has recourse to the second amendment. The right of the people and so forth.

LOL. Nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The North had to win simply Because, only well regulated militia of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

Not the unorganized militias.

Given that the Amendment says the right of the people, who then does not have recourse to it?

Well regulated militia of the People have literal recourse to our Second Article of Amendment, every time the unorganized militia whines about gun control.

That's not an answer.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

There are no individual terms in our Second Article of Amendment.

And, who said that? What legal authority gave you that idea. Or are you just talking out of your bean-farting ass?

There are no individual terms in the 1st Amendment either.

Is it your argument that individuals' free speech is not protected?

 

[danielpalos]

lol. Nobody takes the right wing seriously about the Law, Constitutional or otherwise. Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.

Everyone has recourse to the second amendment. The right of the people and so forth.

LOL. Nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The North had to win simply Because, only well regulated militia of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

Not the unorganized militias.

Given that the Amendment says the right of the people, who then does not have recourse to it?

Well regulated militia of the People have literal recourse to our Second Article of Amendment, every time the unorganized militia whines about gun control.

That's not an answer.

Yes, it is. Why do you believe it isn't?

 

[hadit]

The first clause claims you are simply wrong.

What? All it says is that a well regulated militia is necessary. That is all the first clause tells us.

So the founders intended to tell us that something is necessary and that is all they did in the 2A???

WRONG, YOU FUCKING ASS!!!

Because it's necessary, what does the rest of the Amendment do?

It protects the right of the PEOPLE, not the fucking militia!!!! THAT IS PLAIN ENGLISH, AS IT IS WRITTEN!!!!

THERE ARE NO COLLECTIVE RIGHTS, YOU DUMB FUCK!!!

THE MILITIA DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT.

PEOPLE DO.

INDIVIDUALS EXERCISE RIGHTS. GROUPS ONLY EXERCISE RIGHTS TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY ARE MADE UP OF INDIVIDUALS WHO EXERCISE THEIR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.

All you do is repeat shit over and over and over and over and over and never make a fucking point EVER!!!

I am so FUCK SICK of you

SHUT THE FUCK UP and GO BACK TO MEXICO!!!

.

There are no individual rights in our Second Amendment because it is about the security of a free State not natural rights.

That's not what it says.

The first clause expressly declares it to be the "gospel Truth" for the militia of the United States.

No it doesn't. It says the right of the people, not the militia, as you fantasize.

 

[danielpalos]

There are no individual terms in our Second Article of Amendment.

And, who said that? What legal authority gave you that idea. Or are you just talking out of your bean-farting ass?

There are no individual terms in the 1st Amendment either.

Is it your argument that individuals' free speech is not protected?

willful blindness is a moral turpitude, right winger.

The People are the Militia; you are either, well regulated or not.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

You have the right to be armed in your home.

This is a lie of omission.

How you get maintain that right is up to the state down to the city.

This is a lie of deliberate misrepresentation.

Sorry, you already got your daily reward. You can't get anymore fruitcake awards today.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You have the right to be armed in your home.

This is a lie of omission.

How you get maintain that right is up to the state down to the city.

This is a lie of deliberate misrepresentation.

Sorry, you already got your daily reward. You can't get anymore fruitcake awards today.

Nothing here changes the fact you lied.

 

[Lesh]

The first clause expressly declares it to be the "gospel Truth" for the militia of the United States.

It states that A militia and does not specifically refer to or name a specific organization or body.

It literally states that a militia is necessary and literally states that the right of the people shall not be infringed.

“Literally “ means that those words actually are on that Amendment. They are not