The Right To Bear Arms

[hadit]

If your intention is to say stupid shit in order to lose this argument...you're succeeding

You don't know what you are talking about and have only fallacy for rebuttal instead of Any valid argument.

That's really pathetic. I've seen you try the PeeWee Herman thing before. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

i am not the inferior one with nothing but fallacy.

Yes, yes you are. You haven't produced a valid argument yet.

i can't take Your inferiority seriously; you need a valid argument.

A lot of people have given you many, many valid arguments that you've ignored, only to pop up and regurgitate the same failed phrases over and over again. No one can take you seriously about anything.

 

[hadit]

It doesn't LITERALLY say "A [well regulated] militia" as opposed to "The Militia of the United States"?

It doesn't LITERALLY state that [a militia] [is] (is = a conjugated "be" verb = same as "being") necessary? It doesn't literally state that "the right of the people" to keep and bear arms "shall not be infringed."

I think I pretty much LITERALLY stated it. I added no new words..

.

The People are the Militia; you are Either well regulated or not.

So if the people are the militia, and the militia can't have its right to arms infringed, that means the right of the PEOPLE to bear arms shall not be infringed. You just nuked your own argument.

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States; organize sufficient militia to make that happen, don't make excuses, right wingers. There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine.

Don't you remember? I told you that we already did that, so now we can go back to ordinary people owning guns if they want to.

too lazy to muster but like to be hypocritical about the Poor, allegedly mooching?

Now you're talking about the poor? Pick a subject and stay with it.

 

[Lakhota]

The NRA Comes Out Against The Violence Against Women Act

The NRA is pure evil.

 

[Rigby5]

The NRA Comes Out Against The Violence Against Women Act

The NRA is pure evil.

The NRA has nothing at all to do with it, and in fact, the NRA originated the first gun control legislation back in 1911 when they were tied to the KKK and wanted to ensure Blacks, immigrants, and union organizers would be unable to defend themselves.
There is no excuse for preventing any law abiding citizens from having military grade weapon.
To do so would be to create an elite government not of or by the people.
And that is a dictatorship.
Citizens are more trusted with weapons and need them more than police or military do.
Citizens are the real first line of defense, and the police and military are more likely to either not be there when needed, or be abusive.

 

[danielpalos]

So if the people are the militia, and the militia can't have its right to arms infringed, that means the right of the PEOPLE to bear arms shall not be infringed. You just nuked your own argument.

all he does is respond with bullshit

projecting is what the right wing is best at.

 

[danielpalos]

You don't know what you are talking about and have only fallacy for rebuttal instead of Any valid argument.

That's really pathetic. I've seen you try the PeeWee Herman thing before. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

i am not the inferior one with nothing but fallacy.

Yes, yes you are. You haven't produced a valid argument yet.

i can't take Your inferiority seriously; you need a valid argument.

A lot of people have given you many, many valid arguments that you've ignored, only to pop up and regurgitate the same failed phrases over and over again. No one can take you seriously about anything.

All terms in our Second Amendment are collective and plural; where are you getting your implied individual rights from?

 

[danielpalos]

The People are the Militia; you are Either well regulated or not.

So if the people are the militia, and the militia can't have its right to arms infringed, that means the right of the PEOPLE to bear arms shall not be infringed. You just nuked your own argument.

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States; organize sufficient militia to make that happen, don't make excuses, right wingers. There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine.

Don't you remember? I told you that we already did that, so now we can go back to ordinary people owning guns if they want to.

too lazy to muster but like to be hypocritical about the Poor, allegedly mooching?

Now you're talking about the poor? Pick a subject and stay with it.

no valid rebuttals, only fallacy; i got it, right wingers.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

All terms in our Second Amendment are collective and plural; where are you getting your implied individual rights from?

All terms in our First Amendment are collective and plural.

Explain that, you communist Mexican illegal fuck.

 

[danielpalos]

All terms in our Second Amendment are collective and plural; where are you getting your implied individual rights from?

All terms in our First Amendment are collective and plural.

Explain that, you communist Mexican illegal fuck.

The term Militia is expressly declared in our Second Amendment.

That does explain it, "you refugee from the mountains of the true Caucasians".

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The term Militia is expressly declared in our Second Amendment.

That does explain it, "you refugee from the mountains of the true Caucasians".

Thay explains JACK SHIT. And I am NOT from Caucas.

Militia is a distinct term. "People" is used in the First Amendment, yet none of those rights are "collective" rights. Just because the word "Militia" is in the second amendment does not mean that all terms are collective.

That is the most idiotic claim I have ever heard.

You are a dumb fuck.

Go back to Mexico and enter the country the right way.

.

 

[danielpalos]

The term Militia is expressly declared in our Second Amendment.

That does explain it, "you refugee from the mountains of the true Caucasians".

Thay explains JACK SHIT. And I am NOT from Caucas.

Militia is a distinct term. "People" is used in the First Amendment, yet none of those rights are "collective" rights. Just because the word "Militia" is in the second amendment does not mean that all turms are collective.

That is the most idiotic claim I have ever heard.

You are a dumb fuck.

Go back to Mexico and enter the country the right way.

.

Militia is the distinct term that proves you wrong. Not learn Anglo-Saxon well enough, "you refugee from the Olde World"?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The term Militia is expressly declared in our Second Amendment.

That does explain it, "you refugee from the mountains of the true Caucasians".

Thay explains JACK SHIT. And I am NOT from Caucas.

Militia is a distinct term. "People" is used in the First Amendment, yet none of those rights are "collective" rights. Just because the word "Militia" is in the second amendment does not mean that all turms are collective.

That is the most idiotic claim I have ever heard.

You are a dumb fuck.

Go back to Mexico and enter the country the right way.

.

Militia is the distinct term that proves you wrong. Not learn Anglo-Saxon well enough, "you refugee from the Olde World"?

Fuck you.

Nobody accepts your bullshit communist "collective rights" argument. It is illogical bullshit.

Now, fuck off, troll.

.

 

[danielpalos]

The term Militia is expressly declared in our Second Amendment.

That does explain it, "you refugee from the mountains of the true Caucasians".

Thay explains JACK SHIT. And I am NOT from Caucas.

Militia is a distinct term. "People" is used in the First Amendment, yet none of those rights are "collective" rights. Just because the word "Militia" is in the second amendment does not mean that all turms are collective.

That is the most idiotic claim I have ever heard.

You are a dumb fuck.

Go back to Mexico and enter the country the right way.

.

Militia is the distinct term that proves you wrong. Not learn Anglo-Saxon well enough, "you refugee from the Olde World"?

Fuck you.

Nobody accepts your bullshit communist "collective rights" argument. It is illogical bullshit.

Now, fuck off, troll.

.

You lost already?

Where is your dictionary definition that defines your point of view. You all can cite definitions for socialism.

 

[progressive hunter]

The NRA Comes Out Against The Violence Against Women Act

The NRA is pure evil.

The NRA has nothing at all to do with it, and in fact, the NRA originated the first gun control legislation back in 1911 when they were tied to the KKK and wanted to ensure Blacks, immigrants, and union organizers would be unable to defend themselves.
There is no excuse for preventing any law abiding citizens from having military grade weapon.
To do so would be to create an elite government not of or by the people.
And that is a dictatorship.
Citizens are more trusted with weapons and need them more than police or military do.
Citizens are the real first line of defense, and the police and military are more likely to either not be there when needed, or be abusive.

you ate your KOO-KOO puffs didnt you???

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You lost already?

Where is your dictionary definition that defines your point of view. You all can cite definitions for socialism.

You have NEVER ONCE cited a source.

Shut your fucking illegal Mexican mouth.

.

 

[M14 Shooter]

If you don't feed the troll, he will go away.

 

[danielpalos]

You lost already?

Where is your dictionary definition that defines your point of view. You all can cite definitions for socialism.

You have NEVER ONCE cited a source.

Shut your fucking illegal Mexican mouth.

.

I have cited our express Second Amendment.

Is English your second language; you keep making excuses.

 

[danielpalos]

You lost already?

Where is your dictionary definition that defines your point of view. You all can cite definitions for socialism.

You have NEVER ONCE cited a source.

Shut your fucking illegal Mexican mouth.

.

Our Second Amendment is Express not Implied.

The People are the Militia; you are either well regulated or not.

We should have no security problems in our free States and we really can blame our State legislators for it.

 

[hadit]

That's really pathetic. I've seen you try the PeeWee Herman thing before. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

i am not the inferior one with nothing but fallacy.

Yes, yes you are. You haven't produced a valid argument yet.

i can't take Your inferiority seriously; you need a valid argument.

A lot of people have given you many, many valid arguments that you've ignored, only to pop up and regurgitate the same failed phrases over and over again. No one can take you seriously about anything.

All terms in our Second Amendment are collective and plural; where are you getting your implied individual rights from?

The right of the people. You can't have people without persons. You do understand that, correct?

 

[hadit]

So if the people are the militia, and the militia can't have its right to arms infringed, that means the right of the PEOPLE to bear arms shall not be infringed. You just nuked your own argument.

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States; organize sufficient militia to make that happen, don't make excuses, right wingers. There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine.

Don't you remember? I told you that we already did that, so now we can go back to ordinary people owning guns if they want to.

too lazy to muster but like to be hypocritical about the Poor, allegedly mooching?

Now you're talking about the poor? Pick a subject and stay with it.

no valid rebuttals, only fallacy; i got it, right wingers.

If you have a relevant comment, you'll get a rebuttal. Diversions, however, not so much.