Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
Important and potentially foreshadowing Decision with huge implications gets no press at all: (had to find this on a tiny local outlet). And it may mean that Prop 8 in California will be ruled on constitutionally finally as valid. See discussion below as to why that is important today.
Not heard a PEEP about this in the MSM.
The AG of Utah cited [and apparently swayed with the argument that] Utah's voters' rights were in danger of being suppressed.
And that's why you're not hearing this story on MSNBC for sure. Not sure why it's being hidden on Fox but I have several theories.
This is big news. This is HUGE news. This is the US Supreme Court saying "we are letting the public know that we at least are considering the heavy weight of voters' rights to define marriage for themselves in each state".
I'm pretty sure justice Sotomayor was overseeing this appeal. Might have been the whole panel, I'm not sure. But that would include Kennedy. Apparently the SCOTUS has read its own opinion on Windsor 2013... Others might want to read it too in order to cipher what's is potentially coming: restoration of Prop 8 [which was never ruled on constitutionally and is still law in CA].
And I point that out because now as we speak, CA rogue officials are currently gutting subservient laws [Family Code ruled by Prop 8's definition] in violation of 7 million voters' state and federal constitutional rights to have the weight of their vote counted in democracy. That state has a constitutional statute that says no initiative law may be erased or altered in any way [including potency to rule lower code laws it defines] without another referendum from the voters. This is de facto sedition with no mitigating sugar coat.
For more on the legal discussion visit this thread: http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...ady-progression-of-sedition-and-contempt.html
Also: http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...-forced-to-adopt-orphans-to-these-people.html
And: http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...future-attempt-another-coup-on-democracy.html
U.S. Supreme Court grants Utah's appeal to stay gay marriage court order
Friday, July 18, 2014 4:22 p.m. CDT
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to a request from Utah for an emergency stay of an appeals court order that told the state to recognize hundreds of same-sex marriages performed there pending an appeal.
The appeal for a stay by Utah's attorney general had been widely expected since the 10th Circuit appeals court left intact an existing temporary stay in order to give the state time to seek a lengthier injunction from a higher court.
(Reporting by Daniel Wallis in Denver; Editing by Eric Beech) U.S. Supreme Court grants Utah's appeal to stay gay marriage court order - News - KFGO The Mighty 790AM - Fargo Moorhead, ND
Not heard a PEEP about this in the MSM.
The AG of Utah cited [and apparently swayed with the argument that] Utah's voters' rights were in danger of being suppressed.
And that's why you're not hearing this story on MSNBC for sure. Not sure why it's being hidden on Fox but I have several theories.
This is big news. This is HUGE news. This is the US Supreme Court saying "we are letting the public know that we at least are considering the heavy weight of voters' rights to define marriage for themselves in each state".
I'm pretty sure justice Sotomayor was overseeing this appeal. Might have been the whole panel, I'm not sure. But that would include Kennedy. Apparently the SCOTUS has read its own opinion on Windsor 2013... Others might want to read it too in order to cipher what's is potentially coming: restoration of Prop 8 [which was never ruled on constitutionally and is still law in CA].
And I point that out because now as we speak, CA rogue officials are currently gutting subservient laws [Family Code ruled by Prop 8's definition] in violation of 7 million voters' state and federal constitutional rights to have the weight of their vote counted in democracy. That state has a constitutional statute that says no initiative law may be erased or altered in any way [including potency to rule lower code laws it defines] without another referendum from the voters. This is de facto sedition with no mitigating sugar coat.
For more on the legal discussion visit this thread: http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...ady-progression-of-sedition-and-contempt.html
Also: http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...-forced-to-adopt-orphans-to-these-people.html
And: http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...future-attempt-another-coup-on-democracy.html
Last edited: