The Tolerant Left

It’s freedom of speech, not freedom from consequences

So disagreement requires the consequence of throwing a hissy fit and breaking a speaker?

Snowflake.
Nah it could’ve been anything. If you go somewhere for no other reason than to insult people and piss them off, you should probably expect consequences.
 
So disagreement requires the consequence of throwing a hissy fit and breaking a speaker?

Snowflakeiness is turning to an anonymous message board to try and evoke sympathy for a misogynist, racist bigot.
 
It’s freedom of speech, not freedom from consequences

So disagreement requires the consequence of throwing a hissy fit and breaking a speaker?

Snowflake.
Nah it could’ve been anything. If you go somewhere for no other reason than to insult people and piss them off, you should probably expect consequences.

If a discussion insults and pisses you off...

Snowflake.
“Discussion” :rofl:

The goal was not a discussion. The goal was the OP’s article, except all that happened was a speaker got unplugged. So the event was a total failure for the propaganda machine.
 
It’s freedom of speech, not freedom from consequences

So disagreement requires the consequence of throwing a hissy fit and breaking a speaker?

Snowflake.
Nah it could’ve been anything. If you go somewhere for no other reason than to insult people and piss them off, you should probably expect consequences.

If a discussion insults and pisses you off...

Snowflake.
“Discussion” :rofl:

The goal was not a discussion. The goal was the OP’s article, except all that happened was a speaker got unplugged. So the event was a total failure for the propaganda machine.

It was a panel discussion. Maybe if progressives weren't so insecure about their viewpoints, they wouldn't have to resort to throwing hissy fits and breaking things.
 
It’s freedom of speech, not freedom from consequences

So disagreement requires the consequence of throwing a hissy fit and breaking a speaker?

Snowflake.
Nah it could’ve been anything. If you go somewhere for no other reason than to insult people and piss them off, you should probably expect consequences.

If a discussion insults and pisses you off...

Snowflake.
“Discussion” :rofl:

The goal was not a discussion. The goal was the OP’s article, except all that happened was a speaker got unplugged. So the event was a total failure for the propaganda machine.

It was a panel discussion. Maybe if progressives weren't so insecure about their viewpoints, they wouldn't have to resort to throwing hissy fits and breaking things.
Sure but the discussion wasn’t the goal :thup:
 
No, snowflakeness is being unable to hear a differing opinion without trashing the sound system.

I think it's adorable how you brand bigotry, misogyny, and racism as merely a differing opinion.

The fact that you apply those words to "anything I disagree with" means they no longer mean anything remotely near to what they originally meant.

They are crutches to be used by weaklings such as yourself who can defend your ideas or your fellow travellers except through name-calling.
 

Forum List

Back
Top