The turtle says Biden impeachment “Not good for the country”

I don't know about this. I might have to agree with Mitch. Having Kamala Harris as president would not be good for the country. I'd rather have dementia Joe, depends and all.
The problem is that the Senate would not convict.

There is not much difference between Kamala and Joe. They are both not very bright, and are pawns of the DNC and Deep State which are really in control.

The reason we need Kamala to take over is that the current situation is a charade. We all know BIden is not cognitivly in charge of the US at the moment, and there is no chance he will finish his next term, if he somehow manages to finish the next 17 months.

So he needs to step aside so that Dems can actually vote for candidates who are likely to finish the next term.

But then Newsom is going to run, which is not good for us, because while he is terrible, he's a much better candidate than Joe.

There is no way Dems are going to allow POTUS to debate. Newsom could debate.

My guess is that Dems will wait a bit, then give Biden a dignified way to step aside when he's a little more willing to do so.

But if he doesn't, he's going to come darn hard. Biden has a history of saying and doing dumb things, and lots of people are undoubtedly in possession of evidence. NSA records every verbal and electronic communication which traverses international boundaries and they can.

Section 702 prohibits the NSA from targeting people inside the U.S., but the agency, in “incidental” collection, gathers information from U.S. residents who are communicating with the agency’s overseas targets.

The law then allows the FBI and other intelligence agencies to search those U.S. communications for evidence of crimes, including crimes not connected to terrorism. Many digital rights groups, along with some lawmakers, want to end this so-called backdoor search of Section 702 records.

This collection of U.S. communications without a warrant is, “in a word, wrong,” Representative John Conyers Jr., a Michigan Democrat, said during the March 1 hearing.
 
Mr. Archer: Because people would be intimidated to mess with them.

Mr. Goldman: In what way?

Mr. Archer: Legally.
Mr. Archer: Legally.

Then-Vice President Joe Biden attended dinners with Hunter Biden’s foreign business associates who wired money to Biden associated LLCs.

Jo Biden well son of a bitch he was fired just like that.

It's like talking to a fucking wall.

Archer testified that he never seen any bussiness discussed by Joe during those dinners or calls.

Archer also testified that his impression from what he heard was that Shokin's firing was bad for Burisma because they had him under control. This is supported by the fact that Burisma case had no movement for two years in Shokin's dept and his notoriety was for living a lavish lifestyle while NOT prosecuting the rich.
 
Last edited:
You lack the capacity to commit logic.
200w.gif

Can't make this up.
 
The problem is that the Senate would not convict.
My fellow conservatives get a little excited sometimes. This is one of the few times RINO Mitch is right.

As you say, the Senate would not convict. So after all that energy was put into the impeachment, Biden would still be president.

Problem number two is Biden's replacement. I'm sure my fellow conservatives agree we don't want Kamala to become president. We already had a disastrous eight years with Obama as president, Kamala would probably be worse.
 
It's like talking to a fucking wall.

Archer testified that he never seen any bussiness discussed by Joe during those dinners or calls.

Archer also testified that his impression from what he heard was that Shokin's firing was bad for Burisma because they had him under control. This is supported by the fact that Burisma case had no movement for two years in Shokin's dept and his notoriety was for living a lavish lifestyle while NOT prosecuting the rich.
You're a fucking embciel
Archer put a dagger in Jo biden's lies
 
The problem is that the Senate would not convict.

There is not much difference between Kamala and Joe. They are both not very bright, and are pawns of the DNC and Deep State which are really in control.

The reason we need Kamala to take over is that the current situation is a charade. We all know BIden is not cognitivly in charge of the US at the moment, and there is no chance he will finish his next term, if he somehow manages to finish the next 17 months.

So he needs to step aside so that Dems can actually vote for candidates who are likely to finish the next term.

But then Newsom is going to run, which is not good for us, because while he is terrible, he's a much better candidate than Joe.

There is no way Dems are going to allow POTUS to debate. Newsom could debate.

My guess is that Dems will wait a bit, then give Biden a dignified way to step aside when he's a little more willing to do so.

But if he doesn't, he's going to come darn hard. Biden has a history of saying and doing dumb things, and lots of people are undoubtedly in possession of evidence. NSA records every verbal and electronic communication which traverses international boundaries and they can.

Section 702 prohibits the NSA from targeting people inside the U.S., but the agency, in “incidental” collection, gathers information from U.S. residents who are communicating with the agency’s overseas targets.

The law then allows the FBI and other intelligence agencies to search those U.S. communications for evidence of crimes, including crimes not connected to terrorism. Many digital rights groups, along with some lawmakers, want to end this so-called backdoor search of Section 702 records.

This collection of U.S. communications without a warrant is, “in a word, wrong,” Representative John Conyers Jr., a Michigan Democrat, said during the March 1 hearing.
Since I lean right and consider myself a Conservative, I'm fine with dementia Joe at the helm. I look forward to Republicans taking back control of the Senate and the presidency because I don't want the woke socialist agenda and the abuse of power Democrats have been doing.
 

No, MITCH…what is not good for the country is having a POTUS taking bribes from foreign countries.

He is compromised. His bribes from Ukraine led to this extended war that was over in March 2022, and mayblead us into WWIII.

Biden must be impeached.

Eff Mitch.
If you're ( Republicans, or The Right, collectively) going to impeach Sleepy Old Uncle Joe, then do it right... not like the Idiot Dems X 2 not so long ago.

You need hard evidence... and lots of it... and you need a substantial bipartisan buy-in, in order to obtain a conviction in the Senate.

Otherwise you just have another partisan $hit-Show on your hands that half the country is going to laugh at while the other half rant against your incompetency.
 
Still waiting for your smoking gun?

In the meantime, why don't we talk about Jared Kushner and all the money he received from MBS?
Jared Kushner actually provided a service to MBS. What service did the Bidens provide?

A favored prog trick is comparing things that aren't comparable.
 
Jared Kushner actually provided a service to MBS. What service did the Bidens provide?

Did you not read Archer's testimony?

In his opinion Burisma survived way longer because it got Hunter's good name added to their board.

For mere $50,000 a month thats a hell of a deal for Burisma.

Saudis on the other hand got RIPPED OFF on the insane commision they are paying to Kushner, who by the way makes twice what Minuchin is getting paid, while having just a small fraction of Minuchin's investment experience.
 
Did you not read Archer's testimony?

In his opinion Burisma survived way longer because it got Hunter's good name added to their board.

For mere $50,000 a month thats a hell of a deal for Burisma.

Saudis on the other hand got RIPPED OFF on the insane commision they are paying to Kushner, who by the way makes twice what Minuchin is getting paid, while having just a small fraction of Minuchin's investment experience.
You mean it survived because Joe got Shokin fired. That's already been established. Whether Jared is worth what he gets pad is a matter of opinion. However, getting paid to make the government perform certain favors is a crime.
 
You mean it survived because Joe got Shokin fired. That's already been established.

I suggest you read Archer's testimony on Shokin.

From what he heard Shokin was under control by Burisma's owner and that his removal was bad for Burisma.


Archer:

....Shokin was under control...Shokin being fired was a -- was not good, because he was like under control as it relates to Mykola.


Whoops, another rw fantasy out the window.
 

Forum List

Back
Top