The Warmergate Scandal

[Old Rocks]

While we're at it, in whose pocket is the founder of The Weather Channel, John Coleman, who is in the process of suing Algore for fraud?

SermonAudio.com - Weather Channel Founder: Sue Al Gore for Fraud



And who bought off the founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, who says what we all know; that the environmental movement has been hijacked by a bunch of authoritarian loons with political agendas?

Founder Explains Why He Left Greenpeace | Sweetness & Light

How much longer are we going to have to wait for this lawsuit? Maybe like until eternity? Hell, that garbage would not even make the rank of a frivolous lawsuit.

Another lying, blathering fruitcake.

Jeremy Jacquot | John Coleman: Still Waiting for that Lawsuit

If Coleman’s on-air appearance is any indication of the strength of his legal argument, he’ll probably want to spend more time preparing anyway. For one thing, he claimed that average global temperatures had risen by “maybe a tenth of a degree” over the last century; strange then that the IPCC reported in 2007 that temperatures actually increased by an average of 0.74°C over the same period.

Coleman’s take on the “hockey stick” graph (a reconstruction of Northern Hemisphere temperatures over the past millennium that shows a sharp rise in the last century) was equally laughable. Far from being disproven by “science,” as he asserted, its findings were in fact reaffirmed by a sprawling 2006 report commissioned by the National Academy of Sciences. The authors drew on 1,200 overlapping proxy records, or data sets, including ice and sediment core contents and coral and tree growth trends, to derive historical temperature patterns for the past 2,000 years in both hemispheres. Their conclusion: Yes, Virginia, global warming is real.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Let's review: The Pioneer Anomaly show that gravity is not "Settled science" but we're absolutely sure that the cooked data of Climatology make Global Warming "Settled science"

LOL

 

[mal]

So, we're back to the stale old strategy of attacking the source, rather than the facts of the case, AKA:

Argumentum ad hominem (argument directed at the person). This is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather than the idea itself. The most obvious example of this fallacy is when one debater maligns the character of another debater (e.g, "The members of the opposition are a couple of fascists!"), but this is actually not that common. A more typical manifestation of argumentum ad hominem is attacking a source of information -- for example, responding to a quotation from Richard Nixon on the subject of free trade with China by saying, "We all know Nixon was a liar and a cheat, so why should we believe anything he says?"

Sorry, old fuck, that dog don't hunt.

If you Link FOXNews, and the link is an AP story Posted @ FOXNews, those who don't like what the Story says, who Normally Quote the AP, will Dismiss it because it's FOXNews...

These are Inherently Dishonest People.



peace...

 

[Midnight Marauder]

I see.

No, you do not see. Willfully. That is the entire point.

 

[Ame®icano]

 

[The T]

Welcome To The Machine...

 

[Oddball]

So, we're back to the stale old strategy of attacking the source, rather than the facts of the case, AKA:

Argumentum ad hominem (argument directed at the person). This is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather than the idea itself. The most obvious example of this fallacy is when one debater maligns the character of another debater (e.g, "The members of the opposition are a couple of fascists!"), but this is actually not that common. A more typical manifestation of argumentum ad hominem is attacking a source of information -- for example, responding to a quotation from Richard Nixon on the subject of free trade with China by saying, "We all know Nixon was a liar and a cheat, so why should we believe anything he says?"

Sorry, old fuck, that dog don't hunt.

I see. I can't call a whore a whore if it is your whore

No, you can't see because you have blinders on.

In your totalitarian world, the accused isn't entitled to competent defense and expert counsel.

No...Instead you get to be judge jury and executioner, based upon nothing more than your fantasy charges and fabricated "evidence", and the accused just has to sit there and take it.

Fucking fascist.

 

[Oddball]

Climatologist slams RealClimate.org for 'erroneously communicating the reality of the how climate system is actually behaving'

A UN scientist is declaring that his three fellow UN climate panel colleagues "should be barred from the IPCC process." In a November 26, 2009 message on his website, UN IPCC contributing author Dr. Eduardo Zorita writes: "CRU files: Why I think that Michael Mann, Phil Jones and Stefan Rahmstorf should be barred from the IPCC process."

Zorita writes: "Short answer: Because the scientific assessments in which they may take part are not credible anymore."

Zorita indicates that he is aware that he is putting his career in jeopardy by going after the upper echelon of UN IPCC scientists. "By writing these lines I will just probably achieve that a few of my future studies will, again, not see the light of publication," Zorita candidly admits, a reference to the ClimateGate emails discussing how to suppress data and scientific studies that do not agree with the UN IPCC views.

Zorita was a UN IPCC Contributing Author of the Fourth Assessment Report in 2007. Since 2003, Zorita has headed the Department of Paleoclimate and has been a senior scientist at the Institute for Coastal Research of the GKSS Research Centre in Germany. Zorita has published more than 70 peer-reviewed scientific studies.

Zorita's stunning candor continued, noting that scientists who disagreed with the UN IPCC climate view were "bullied and subtly blackmailed."

Climatologist slams RealClimate.org for 'erroneously communicating the reality of the how climate system is actually behaving' | Climate Depot

 

[2Parties]

Of course it was BS. Even if their "facts" were true they couldn't give 2 shits about the New Zealand Blue Footed Woodpecker Penguin's habitat melting. All they ever cared about was you worshiping them and their god (aka themselves).

 

[Oddball]

That and affecting political policies around the world, without ever having to bother getting elected to anything.

 

[Oddball]

Interesting blurb I just came across, while doing some related research:

Comment: Tom Nelson [papertiger] Of course the emails are real. More then that, we know who the insider/mole is. Keith Briffa (of the CRU) leaked these emails. How do I know? The author of the Yamal chronologies released the data dump through his Russian contacts, that's how I know. He was severely ill, maybe still is. Had himself a death bed conversion, and decided on a course of action to come clean circumventing...

SOURCE

 

[Midnight Marauder]

Interesting blurb I just came across, while doing some related research:

Comment: Tom Nelson [papertiger] Of course the emails are real. More then that, we know who the insider/mole is. Keith Briffa (of the CRU) leaked these emails. How do I know? The author of the Yamal chronologies released the data dump through his Russian contacts, that's how I know. He was severely ill, maybe still is. Had himself a death bed conversion, and decided on a course of action to come clean circumventing...

SOURCE

Keith Briffa

Keith Briffa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

His email address included at first link. One of us could ask him I suppose...

 

[Oddball]

Check out the dweeb trying to sputter and spin his way out of answering direct questions, in the second half of this one:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHATItyOsdY[/ame]

 

[Sinatra]

Christopher Booker comes out swinging...


Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation

Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with the Climategate whitewash, says Christopher Booker.

...The reason why even the Guardian's George Monbiot has expressed total shock and dismay at the picture revealed by the documents is that their authors are not just any old bunch of academics. Their importance cannot be overestimated, What we are looking at here is the small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

...Dr Jones is also a key part of the closely knit group of American and British scientists responsible for promoting that picture of world temperatures conveyed by Michael Mann's "hockey stick" graph which 10 years ago turned climate history on its head by showing that, after 1,000 years of decline, global temperatures have recently shot up to their highest level in recorded history.

Given star billing by the IPCC, not least for the way it appeared to eliminate the long-accepted Mediaeval Warm Period when temperatures were higher they are today, the graph became the central icon of the entire man-made global warming movement.

Since 2003, however, when the statistical methods used to create the "hockey stick" were first exposed as fundamentally flawed by an expert Canadian statistician Steve McIntyre, an increasingly heated battle has been raging between Mann's supporters, calling themselves "the Hockey Team", and McIntyre and his own allies, as they have ever more devastatingly called into question the entire statistical basis on which the IPCC and CRU construct their case.

...What is tragically evident from the Harry Read Me file is the picture it gives of the CRU scientists hopelessly at sea with the complex computer programmes they had devised to contort their data in the approved direction, more than once expressing their own desperation at how difficult it was to get the desired results.

The third shocking revelation of these documents is the ruthless way in which these academics have been determined to silence any expert questioning of the findings they have arrived at by such dubious methods – not just by refusing to disclose their basic data but by discrediting and freezing out any scientific journal which dares to publish their critics' work. It seems they are prepared to stop at nothing to stifle scientific debate in this way, not least by ensuring that no dissenting research should find its way into the pages of IPCC reports.


...Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with a whitewash of what has become the greatest scientific scandal of our age.



Full article here:


Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation - Telegraph

 

[The T]

Check out the dweeb trying to sputter and spin his way out of answering direct questions, in the second half of this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHATItyOsdY

Notice the guy in the last part of that segment cites "POLLUTION", and "BUSH" in the same sentence...I guess he like Bush now, eh?

Stuart Varney PW3ND that jackass...

 

[The T]

Christopher Booker comes out swinging...


Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation

Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with the Climategate whitewash, says Christopher Booker.

...The reason why even the Guardian's George Monbiot has expressed total shock and dismay at the picture revealed by the documents is that their authors are not just any old bunch of academics. Their importance cannot be overestimated, What we are looking at here is the small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

...Dr Jones is also a key part of the closely knit group of American and British scientists responsible for promoting that picture of world temperatures conveyed by Michael Mann's "hockey stick" graph which 10 years ago turned climate history on its head by showing that, after 1,000 years of decline, global temperatures have recently shot up to their highest level in recorded history.

Given star billing by the IPCC, not least for the way it appeared to eliminate the long-accepted Mediaeval Warm Period when temperatures were higher they are today, the graph became the central icon of the entire man-made global warming movement.

Since 2003, however, when the statistical methods used to create the "hockey stick" were first exposed as fundamentally flawed by an expert Canadian statistician Steve McIntyre, an increasingly heated battle has been raging between Mann's supporters, calling themselves "the Hockey Team", and McIntyre and his own allies, as they have ever more devastatingly called into question the entire statistical basis on which the IPCC and CRU construct their case.

...What is tragically evident from the Harry Read Me file is the picture it gives of the CRU scientists hopelessly at sea with the complex computer programmes they had devised to contort their data in the approved direction, more than once expressing their own desperation at how difficult it was to get the desired results.

The third shocking revelation of these documents is the ruthless way in which these academics have been determined to silence any expert questioning of the findings they have arrived at by such dubious methods – not just by refusing to disclose their basic data but by discrediting and freezing out any scientific journal which dares to publish their critics' work. It seems they are prepared to stop at nothing to stifle scientific debate in this way, not least by ensuring that no dissenting research should find its way into the pages of IPCC reports.


...Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with a whitewash of what has become the greatest scientific scandal of our age.



Full article here:


Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation - Telegraph

Good Article. Their entire argument is screwed, and they know it. (I cannot REP YOU at this time unfortunately). Good find.

 

[Midnight Marauder]

Stuart Varney PW3ND that jackass...

 

[skookerasbil]

so hacked e-mails are proof a of a conspiracy? .....right! - snore....next.

you dummy................

This week effectively and offically ends ANY talk of consensus on the matter of "man-made" global warming............that is unless youre a fcukking k00k............

Accordingly...........you're...............

 

[The T]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNbxYVa2VjA&NR=1"]Glenn Beck on "ClimateGate" Man-Made Global Warming Climate Scam-Actual Proven Conspiracy 11-23-09[/ame]

 

[concept]

Repository of links about Climategate.

Climategate « Watts Up With That?