They Did It AGAIN - 6 Jan Committee Caught Altering Evidence Then Lied About It

[struth]

Post evidence the company was corrupt after Hunter joined...

haha the case was still going on…the boss was still the same guy. hunter jusr joined the team and took a lot of the money they earned corruptly

 

[DBA]

Suuuure, Spunky.

The Hunter Biden story is sending smoke signals to the moon and yet you in other hopelessly indoctrinated souls like you sit by and act like there's no possibility of fire.

 

[Faun]

haha the case was still going on…the boss was still the same guy. hunter jusr joined the team and took a lot of the money they earned corruptly

The case was regarding corruption from before Hunter worked there. What part of that are you not getting?

And it wasn't actively pursued because Shokin was on the case and he was protecting Zlochevsky. He didn't prosecute him after 2 countries went after him over a 2 year period.

 

[Faun]

The Hunter Biden story is sending smoke signals to the moon and yet you in other hopelessly indoctrinated souls like you sit by and act like there's no possibility of fire.

Regarding Burisma, the only ones smoking were righties. Joe handled it properly, getting a corrupt prosecutor thrown out.

 

[Indeependent]

Horseshit.

If Trump took a bribe to hold back millitary aid to Ukraine, would that be a corrupt, impeachable offense? OF COURSE it would be and the fact that it was part of foreign policy would not change that fact in any shape or form.

Trump CORRUPTLY pressured Ukraine for his personal electortal interests and against American foreign policy interests.

Zelensky is so corrupt he makes Trump look like Mary Poppins.

 

[struth]

The case was regarding corruption from before Hunter worked there. What part of that are you not getting?

And it wasn't actively pursued because Shokin was on the case and he was protecting Zlochevsky. He didn't prosecute him after 2 countries went after him over a 2 year period.

No I get it....Hunter took a job at a corrupt company....I get it, you act like that some sort of great thing.

That's a lie....he was no protecting Zlochevsky......the Biden's were...hence why he hired Hunter.

Joe and Hunter Biden golfed with Ukraine gas executive in 2014​

Joe and Hunter Biden golfed with Ukraine gas executive in 2014

A photo has surfaced that shows former Vice President Joe Biden posing with his son Hunter and Devon Archer, who served with Hunter on the board of Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings…

nypost.com

 

[Faun]

No I get it....Hunter took a job at a corrupt company....I get it, you act like that some sort of great thing.

That's a lie....he was no protecting Zlochevsky......the Biden's were...hence why he hired Hunter.

Joe and Hunter Biden golfed with Ukraine gas executive in 2014​

Joe and Hunter Biden golfed with Ukraine gas executive in 2014

A photo has surfaced that shows former Vice President Joe Biden posing with his son Hunter and Devon Archer, who served with Hunter on the board of Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings…

nypost.com

LOLOLOL

You imbecile. That "Ukraine gas executive" Was Hunter's good friend, Devon Archer, another member on Burismas board of directors who like Hunter, was hired by Burisma for international name recognition as his step father is John Kerry. And it was Devon Archer who got Hunter the job.

Who knows why you thought that photo is incriminating somehow when all you really did was to expose your ignorance again.

 

[struth]

LOLOLOL

You imbecile. That "Ukraine gas executive" Was Hunter's good friend, Devon Archer, another member on Burismas board of directors who like Hunter, was hired by Burisma for international name recognition as his step father is John Kerry. And it was Devon Archer who got Hunter the job.

Who knows why you thought that photo is incriminating somehow when all you really did was to expose your ignorance again.

yet, the Bidens were good friends with corrupt Ukrainians....you think this helps you how>?

 

[Faun]

yet, the Bidens were good friends with corrupt Ukrainians....you think this helps you how>?

LOLOLOL

Imbecile ... there isn't a Ukrainian in that photo.

 

[AntonToo]

what was corrupt about the election?

Just another incoherent post from our lost asstruth

 

[struth]

Just another incoherent post from our lost asstruth

Everyone around the Xiden's criminal cartel is involved in corruption and fraud: Hunter Biden’s pal sentenced to prison for role in fraud scheme

Hunter Biden’s pal sentenced to prison for role in fraud scheme​

A former business partner of Hunter Biden was sentenced Monday to more than a year in prison for his role in a scheme to defraud a Native American tribe of some $60 million in bonds.

The defendant, Devon Archer, was sentenced to one year and one day in federal prison by Manhattan Judge Ronnie Abrams, who said the crime was “too serious” to let him just walk.

“There’s no dispute about the harm caused to real people,” Abrams said, noting that the defrauded tribe, the Oglala Sioux, is one of the poorest in the nation.

 

[Faun]

Regarding Burisma, the only ones smoking were righties. Joe handled it properly, getting a corrupt prosecutor thrown out.

For the benefit of the low information posters permeating this forum, watch how Shokin protected Zlochevsky.

Zlochevsky was under suspicion in the U.K. in early 2014, when they opened an investigation into the oligarch and froze $23 million of his assets pending investigation...

The money machine: how a high-profile corruption investigation fell apart

The long read: After a revolution overthrew Ukraine’s disgraced president, Theresa May promised to help the country’s new leaders recover stolen assets. But the UK’s first case collapsed within a year

www.theguardian.com

​

On 14 April 2014, the money was frozen at a special court hearing in London requested by the Serious Fraud Office. As described in the later court judgment, the SFO argued that “there were reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant [Zlochevsky] had engaged in criminal conduct in Ukraine and the funds in the BNP account were believed to be the proceeds of such criminal conduct”.​

That U.K. investigation pressed Ukraine to deliver documentation in regards to Zlochevsky's business dealings so they could build a case against him...

By 20 May 2014, Gould had obtained 6,170 electronic documents from BNP Paribas related to Zlochevsky’s money, and assembled a special team to examine them. He also wanted evidence from Ukraine, so he wrote to the head of the international department of the general prosecutors’ office, Vitaly Kasko, in Kiev.​

More than half a year later, after getting nothing from Ukraine, the U.K. was forced to release the frozen $23 million and their investigation into Zlochevsky fizzled...

“The investigation began but, no matter how much we pushed the investigators, it was not effective,” Kasko told me. Even when Zlochevsky’s lawyers announced they would contest the freezing of the $23m in a London court, the Ukrainian prosecutors still failed to send the SFO the evidence it needed to maintain the freezing order. “First the British wrote to me, then the Americans, with questions about what was happening with the investigation,” Kasko remembered.​

So who was the Ukrainian prosecutor who stonewalled the UK's investigation...?

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

​

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.​

​

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.​

​

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.​

Shokin was corrupt and protecting Zlochevsky. He did so for the year following that when he was promoted to Prosecutor General.

 

[struth]

For the benefit of the low information posters permeating this forum, watch how Shokin protected Zlochevsky.

Zlochevsky was under suspicion in the U.K. in early 2014, when they opened an investigation into the oligarch and froze $23 million of his assets pending investigation...

The money machine: how a high-profile corruption investigation fell apart

The long read: After a revolution overthrew Ukraine’s disgraced president, Theresa May promised to help the country’s new leaders recover stolen assets. But the UK’s first case collapsed within a year

www.theguardian.com

​

On 14 April 2014, the money was frozen at a special court hearing in London requested by the Serious Fraud Office. As described in the later court judgment, the SFO argued that “there were reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant [Zlochevsky] had engaged in criminal conduct in Ukraine and the funds in the BNP account were believed to be the proceeds of such criminal conduct”.​

That U.K. investigation pressed Ukraine to deliver documentation in regards to Zlochevsky's business dealings so they could build a case against him...

By 20 May 2014, Gould had obtained 6,170 electronic documents from BNP Paribas related to Zlochevsky’s money, and assembled a special team to examine them. He also wanted evidence from Ukraine, so he wrote to the head of the international department of the general prosecutors’ office, Vitaly Kasko, in Kiev.​

More than half a year later, after getting nothing from Ukraine, the U.K. was forced to release the frozen $23 million and their investigation into Zlochevsky fizzled...

“The investigation began but, no matter how much we pushed the investigators, it was not effective,” Kasko told me. Even when Zlochevsky’s lawyers announced they would contest the freezing of the $23m in a London court, the Ukrainian prosecutors still failed to send the SFO the evidence it needed to maintain the freezing order. “First the British wrote to me, then the Americans, with questions about what was happening with the investigation,” Kasko remembered.​

So who was the Ukrainian prosecutor who stonewalled the UK's investigation...?

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

​

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.​

​

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.​

​

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.​

Shokin was corrupt and protecting Zlochevsky. He did so for the year following that when he was promoted to Prosecutor General.

They wrote to Vitaly Kasko according to your own link and quote...not Shokin.

That appears to be their problem Burisma Holdings hired Hunter Xiden and his corrupt pals, because they knew they'd get protection from Hunter's corrupt dad

 

[struth]

For the benefit of the low information posters permeating this forum, watch how Shokin protected Zlochevsky.

Zlochevsky was under suspicion in the U.K. in early 2014, when they opened an investigation into the oligarch and froze $23 million of his assets pending investigation...

The money machine: how a high-profile corruption investigation fell apart

The long read: After a revolution overthrew Ukraine’s disgraced president, Theresa May promised to help the country’s new leaders recover stolen assets. But the UK’s first case collapsed within a year

www.theguardian.com

​

On 14 April 2014, the money was frozen at a special court hearing in London requested by the Serious Fraud Office. As described in the later court judgment, the SFO argued that “there were reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant [Zlochevsky] had engaged in criminal conduct in Ukraine and the funds in the BNP account were believed to be the proceeds of such criminal conduct”.​

That U.K. investigation pressed Ukraine to deliver documentation in regards to Zlochevsky's business dealings so they could build a case against him...

By 20 May 2014, Gould had obtained 6,170 electronic documents from BNP Paribas related to Zlochevsky’s money, and assembled a special team to examine them. He also wanted evidence from Ukraine, so he wrote to the head of the international department of the general prosecutors’ office, Vitaly Kasko, in Kiev.​

More than half a year later, after getting nothing from Ukraine, the U.K. was forced to release the frozen $23 million and their investigation into Zlochevsky fizzled...

“The investigation began but, no matter how much we pushed the investigators, it was not effective,” Kasko told me. Even when Zlochevsky’s lawyers announced they would contest the freezing of the $23m in a London court, the Ukrainian prosecutors still failed to send the SFO the evidence it needed to maintain the freezing order. “First the British wrote to me, then the Americans, with questions about what was happening with the investigation,” Kasko remembered.​

So who was the Ukrainian prosecutor who stonewalled the UK's investigation...?

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

​

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.​

​

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.​

​

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.​

Shokin was corrupt and protecting Zlochevsky. He did so for the year following that when he was promoted to Prosecutor General.

Your article also goes on to say:

By then, however, almost two years had passed since the revolution and many Ukrainians had become disillusioned. The credibility of the United States was not helped by the news that since May 2014, Biden’s son Hunter had been on the board of directors of Burisma, Zlochevsky’s company

.
The White House insisted the position was a private matter for Hunter Biden, and unrelated to his father’s job, but that is not how anyone I spoke to in Ukraine interpreted it. Hunter Biden is an undistinguished corporate lawyer, with no previous Ukraine experience. Why would a Ukrainian tycoon hire him?

Hunter Biden failed to reply to questions I sent him, but he told the Wall Street Journal in December 2015 that he had joined Burisma “to strengthen corporate governance and transparency at a company working to advance energy security”. That was not an explanation that many people found reassuring. The Washington Post was particularly damning: “The appointment of the vice president’s son to a Ukrainian oil board looks nepotistic at best, nefarious at worst,” it wrote, shortly after Hunter Biden’s appointment. “You have to wonder how big the salary has to be to put US soft power at risk like this. Pretty big, we’d imagine.”

 

[Faun]

They wrote to Vitaly Kasko according to your own link and quote...not Shokin.

That appears to be their problem Burisma Holdings hired Hunter Xiden and his corrupt pals, because they knew they'd get protection from Hunter's corrupt dad

LOL

Who knows why you think it matters who reported that? Do you think, had they asked Shokin if he stonewalled the investigation, he would have acknoweleged that?

 

[Faun]

Your article also goes on to say:

By then, however, almost two years had passed since the revolution and many Ukrainians had become disillusioned. The credibility of the United States was not helped by the news that since May 2014, Biden’s son Hunter had been on the board of directors of Burisma, Zlochevsky’s company

.
The White House insisted the position was a private matter for Hunter Biden, and unrelated to his father’s job, but that is not how anyone I spoke to in Ukraine interpreted it. Hunter Biden is an undistinguished corporate lawyer, with no previous Ukraine experience. Why would a Ukrainian tycoon hire him?

Hunter Biden failed to reply to questions I sent him, but he told the Wall Street Journal in December 2015 that he had joined Burisma “to strengthen corporate governance and transparency at a company working to advance energy security”. That was not an explanation that many people found reassuring. The Washington Post was particularly damning: “The appointment of the vice president’s son to a Ukrainian oil board looks nepotistic at best, nefarious at worst,” it wrote, shortly after Hunter Biden’s appointment. “You have to wonder how big the salary has to be to put US soft power at risk like this. Pretty big, we’d imagine.”

I already pointed out he was hired for name recognition.

 

[struth]

LOL

Who knows why you think it matters who reported that? Do you think, had they asked Shokin if he stonewalled the investigation, he would have acknoweleged that?

Of course it matter who they asked.....they apparently asked the wrong person. Your articles doesn't mention Shokin at all....but it does discuss how the Xiden crime cartel and the placement of Hunter and his corrupt commrade on the board undermined the investigation

 

[struth]

I already pointed out he was hired for name recognition.

ie protection

 

[Faun]

Of course it matter who they asked.....they apparently asked the wrong person. Your articles doesn't mention Shokin at all....but it does discuss how the Xiden crime cartel and the placement of Hunter and his corrupt commrade on the board undermined the investigation

LOL

This article doesn't mention Shokin??? You're out of your mind, con.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

 

[Faun]

ie protection

If that were true, Shokin's replacement wouldn't have been able to successfully go after Zlochevsky for back taxes, where he was fined millions of dollars. How come Shokin couldn't do what Lutsenko did?